Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:
Thomas Mitchell
Thomas Mitchell is the editor of the Review-Journal and writes about the newspaper's role in the community.
View all blog entries
November 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Oct    
  01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Monthly archives
Condoning with silence

Public employee unions and their allies in the Democratic Party will stop at nothing to protect their lucrative perks against fiscal conservatives, including spending lavishly on political mailers containing distortions and outright lies.

It works on gullible voters who fail to take the time to educate themselves before throwing away their votes, ignorantly offering up more of their tax dollars to fund the salaries and pensions of public employees that far exceed what they could ever expect.

This tactic took out two of the brightest and most thoughtful state senators on election day.

State Sens. Bob Beers and Joe Heck were ousted using smear tactics.

Heck in particular was accused of favoring letting women get cervical cancer because he voted against a bill that would have required insurance companies to pay for an expensive vaccine that might offer some protection from a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer. Heck, an emergency room physician and a colonel in the Army Reserves, reasoned the cost was too high and efficacy unproved.

Yet he was hit with mailers that said he voted against cervical cancer screenings, which was never the case. (Read
Molly Ball's story on the campaigns against the two Republican state senators.)



That story we know, but there is more that took place behind the scene.

In a letter to the Review-Journal Saturday morning the wife of Dr. Heck, Lisa Heck, bemoaned the ill-informed voters who simply voted for a party instead of a candidate.

Then she revealed Senate Majority Leader Harry had called her husband about the tactics his party was using.

“Harry Reid, who called Sen. Heck to plead his denial of having anything to do with these tactics, refused to denounce the smear campaign when Sen. Heck asked him to,” Lisa Heck wrote. “Reid has turned into a political whore, abandoned Nevada when he became majority leader and is nothing more than your basic strategic liar.  Steve Horsford, who arrogantly thinks he is the next Obama, called Sen. Heck a ‘whiner’ for asking Reid to have some integrity and help stop the false accusations. Is it whining, Mr. Horsford, when you are asking someone to campaign fairly, with integrity, and simply tell the truth? How sad for him he finds playing fair with honor unfathomable. Neither of these men, as well as Ms. (Democratic opponent Shirley) Breeden have any respect for the political process, another human being or most importantly, themselves. To attack a man and a U.S. soldier of impeccable character and integrity the way they did, after serving his country to provide trauma care to our wounded sons and daughters, is truly disgusting.”

Dr. Heck recently served a tour of duty in Iraq and wrote about it for the Review-Journal. (Part one, part two, part three of his dispatches.)

Lisa Heck went on to add, “No one should have to explain what we had to, to our 11-year-old son, and no one should have to see the hurt in their children's eyes or alleviate the fears the way we did when these three created lies about their father.  Where in God's name is their common social decency? Ms. Breeden, Mr. Horsford and Dirty Harry can never understand the damage they did to an innocent child, all in the name of climbing the political ladder.”

An argument can be made that those who will not publicly denounce despicable behavior condone it.
Add a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
6 Responses to "Condoning with silence"
This couldn't have been put any better- the campaigns of both Sen. Heck, one of our best and brightest legislators as well as Sen. Beers, will go down in history as being the lowest and unethical campaigns ever. I imagine the Democrats responsible for this- Sen. Reid, Sen. Horseford and Ms. Breeden (she doesn't deserve the title)think they did good. I pity them and their lack of any decency, not just social. These three should have had ethics charges filed against them. Whether you are Republican or Democrat, this is not the type of unethical behavior bar we want to set, nor will we tolerate. One thing the above derelicts can count on is that we won't forget your cowardly way of winning a seat for the moronic, retard-like Breeden. You have gone way over an acceptable line. If Ms. Breeden had a ounce of morals or values left, she would step down and turn it back over to the person who has proven he is the best one for the job. But that's a big if. Shame on her especially for thinking she "won" something. She's even too stupid to know she was played like a fiddle and put out there to take the fall for their political greed. It is truly shocking that someone can act like this and get away with it. Or at least think they did. Until 2010 and 2012 anyhow.
Written by: Maria on Saturday, Nov. 08, 2008 at 10:06 PM
Nevada needs to get rid of Harry Reid!
Written by: JJ on Monday, Nov. 10, 2008 at 1:17 PM
I know Joe Heck to be a person of integrity who has always had Nevadans and their pocket book issues foremost in mind. As a Democrat, I have NOT seen eye-to-eye with Senator Heck, and we have debated the issues Nevadan to Nevadan.

Any campaign that distorts the record does an injustice to the voters, as well as insults their intelligence. Ms. Breeden ran a "shadow campaign" which did not allow the voters to evaluate what she stood for, yet winning elections - just as prize fighting - is about knocking the title holder off their game. And politics is "dirty", not doubt about it, and voters en masse like that aspect of the game; or, they would demand that campaigns must prove their arguments before print or TV media broadcasts their demeaning dribble. I did not see one campaign ad from either Party that would have stood the test of logic or relevance with any high school-level debating club.

Unfortunately, we do not improve or progress as a society; we continue to accept - in fact embrace - the same mediocrity in our media, in our politics and in our businesses. Nothing changes except the faces. Find me an honest person and I will show you a fool who cannot survive in our "intellectually dishonest" world of politics.

Pogo's words always ring true.
Written by: Ted DeCorte on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM
The below comments are well written and reflect, I imagine, the sentimets of serious voters. Unfortunately, voters who simply voted down party line are not serious voters, let alone intelligent or informed voters. Those who voted for Ms. Breeden thinking she would be the best person (there must have been about 10 people) probably voted for her as a friend- another intellectual-lacking reason. I am proud to be a democrat, but not proud of the way my party has a bottom-of-the-barrel mentality to win at any cost. Ms. Breeden has shown she has no business at the legislative level, and her service will be one of puppetry, lack of independent thinking and severe lack of common sense. She had nothing to offer in terms of sane decisions, answers or suggestions. I personally challenge her to step up to the plate for the sake of District 5 and step down- Now that the Democrats have taken what they want through unethical behavior, can she be more stupid than I thought, thinking they will rally behind her, educate her and "take care of her" as they promised? I think not. How anyone who voted for her can be proud is beyond me. They will come to regret it in a few short months when the session starts and she doesn't understand the meaning of the words "draft a bill". My guess is she will continue her invisible ways- vote how Horseford tells her, draft bills for him putting her name on it, and avoiding speaking to lobbyists as much as possible. She is neither qualified for this position, but more impiortantly, she is not deserving. How sad for her if she thinks she does.
Written by: Jack S. Rogers. on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2008 at 3:19 PM
I too am a democrat- have been one my whole life. And I am also disappointed the way this campaign went down. Is this what we voters have to look forward to in the future- meaingless candidates allowing someone else to run their campaigns so they can get elected while not having a clue of the important issuers surrounding us? This was not the time to elect a no-brainer as Breeden and allow her to make uneducated decisions in our best interests. To you folks who voted for her, ask yourselves just one important question... why? Did you have information on Ms. Breeden that no one else had? Is she a member of Mensa? The answer, I suspect, is 'don't know'. They just went down party line, which is the most unintelligent way to vote. If you have family, shame on you. You sold your soul to the devil and we all know the devil makes you pay your dues. This will not be without drastic and unfavorable consequences.
Written by: MArylin on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2008 at 6:22 PM
This article is right on the mark. Mrs, Heck correctly mak it a point that it isn't just the candidates who suffer the attacks of the lies. If there is a family involved, how does one explain to their children that no honey, daddy does not favor executing children? What Reid, Horseford an Breeden did was beyond kind words and just shows how desperate hey were to take out not only an effective elected official, but to disparage one of US's finest- our soldiers! The above three have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are void of any decency from one human to another. Don't we call those people social deviants and lock them up? Is it any difference if you do it in the political arena? No. If you were to say the horrible and false things about anyone on the street, and they sued for slander, they would win. Why is it ok to do when politics is involved? Saying shame on these three is no where near what really should be said of them. Most importantly, neither Breeden or Reid gets my vote next time around, and I for one, will be sure to remind voters of their dispicable tactics come 2010 and 2012. All three are nothing more than garbage that needs to be thrown out.
Written by: Terrance on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2008 at 6:34 PM
Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites
More Blogs