Everyone talks about bias but nobody does anything about it
One of the problems with all those people who try to measure bias in the news media is that they usually only study what the publication or broadcast produces. Now come a study that looks at what the media did not produce.
A story in the current edition of Scientific American gives a sneak peak at a scientific study to be published in December. Tim Groeling, a political scientist at the University of California, Los Angeles, looked at presidential polls by Fox news, ABC, CBS and NBC from 1997 to early 2008. Scientific American article
He found CBS was 35 percent less likely to report a decline in approval for Bill Clinton and was 33 percent more likely to report a drop in approval for George W. Bush than an increase. In contrast Groeling found Fox was 67 percent less likely to report an increase in approval for Clinton than a decrease. Fox was 36 percent more likely tell of an increase for Bush than a decrease.
Combine that with the report from the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism on media bias in the coverage of Barack Obama vs. John McCain and the media gets two black eyes. Pew report
The study found stories about Obama were about equally neutral, positive or negative, but stories about McCain were 57 percent negative compared to 14 percent positive and the rest neutral.
As I’ve always recommended, read and watch with a skeptical eye and you can get the facts while evaluating the tone and spin without being hoodwinked.
And while you are at this exercise in self-flagellation, pick up a copy of today's Review-Journal and read the lambasting the press gets from science fiction novelist Orson Scott Card. It is not on our Web site because we respect his copyright. But you can find it elsewhere online if you are too cheap to spring for the 75 cents. Article by Orson Scott Card
A story in the current edition of Scientific American gives a sneak peak at a scientific study to be published in December. Tim Groeling, a political scientist at the University of California, Los Angeles, looked at presidential polls by Fox news, ABC, CBS and NBC from 1997 to early 2008. Scientific American article
He found CBS was 35 percent less likely to report a decline in approval for Bill Clinton and was 33 percent more likely to report a drop in approval for George W. Bush than an increase. In contrast Groeling found Fox was 67 percent less likely to report an increase in approval for Clinton than a decrease. Fox was 36 percent more likely tell of an increase for Bush than a decrease.
Combine that with the report from the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism on media bias in the coverage of Barack Obama vs. John McCain and the media gets two black eyes. Pew report
The study found stories about Obama were about equally neutral, positive or negative, but stories about McCain were 57 percent negative compared to 14 percent positive and the rest neutral.
As I’ve always recommended, read and watch with a skeptical eye and you can get the facts while evaluating the tone and spin without being hoodwinked.
And while you are at this exercise in self-flagellation, pick up a copy of today's Review-Journal and read the lambasting the press gets from science fiction novelist Orson Scott Card. It is not on our Web site because we respect his copyright. But you can find it elsewhere online if you are too cheap to spring for the 75 cents. Article by Orson Scott Card
This entry was posted on Tuesday, Oct. 28, 2008 at 10:03 AM
and is filed under Thomas Mitchell.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response.
1
Response
to "Everyone talks about bias but nobody does anything about it"
What does it all mean?
Perhaps this: That it's time to admit there's some bias in the news. One leans right, one leans left, one limps along. Maybe the problem is the pretense that bias can be eliminated in an increasingly personal world of journalism.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Comments (1)
Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Share your thoughts on this story.
Sign in or register to make a comment.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.