Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Thomas Mitchell

Friday
Mar 19, 2010
Sunny
Sunny 73° Weather Forecast

Thomas Mitchell
Thomas Mitchell is the editor of the Review-Journal and writes about the newspaper's role in the community.
View all blog entries
March 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Feb    
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Monthly archives
Journalists detained to keep them from pestering doctor for Michael Jackson




Freedom of the press? Try telling that to your average crime scene reporters and photographers.

For years, we and other newspapers have complained in futility about cops who want to play editor. Arrive on a scene and identify yourself as a newspaper or television representative and you will be corralled along with others of your ilk in some isolated area out of view of the scene, lest you photograph something the cops don't want the public to see. Might be a dead body, an injured cop, a victim or something ghastly. Never mind that it is up to media to decide what to publish, and we do discriminate.

Meanwhile, ordinary citizens are allowed to come and go at will. Freedom of the citizen, if you will, but not the press.

Now that attitude has been extended to family court.

Today Review-Journal
reporter Brian Haynes tells us that following a Monday child support hearing for Dr. Conrad Murray, whose medical care for late pop star Michael Jackson has drawn the scrutiny of authorities and the press, reporters were detained by bailiffs until Murray and his entourage could escape the building without being subjected to any pesky questions by those rude journalists.

"After the hearing, Murray and his entourage were allowed to leave the courtroom while bailiffs held about a dozen reporters inside against their will for 'public safety' reasons," Haynes writes. "The bailiffs released the reporters after Murray left the building several minutes later."

Ken Ritter of The
Associated Press also reported on the detention of the press.

"Senior Clark County District Judge Gerald Hardcastle had left the bench when an armed, uniformed court marshal, Dennis Curran, politely declined several requests by journalists to let them leave.

"Curran said he was following orders. His supervisor, Sgt. Steve Rushfield, did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment."

Ritter reported that Clark County courts spokesman Michael Sommermeyer was also among those detained. Sommermeyer later said he did not know why the courtroom exit was blocked, but it might have been to maintain safety and decorum.

"They're police officers," Sommermeyer was quoted as saying. "I guess they can deem what is necessary for public safety."

Yeah, right.

The Review-Journal has prepared a letter to send to the judge in the case, Gerald Hardcastle.

It says, "We believe this conduct was outrageous. Reporters have a right to exit the courtroom at the same time as other participants or spectators to the proceedings. This was not a criminal matter and there were no security concerns present.  We believe your bailiff's actions serve to undermine respect for the court system since they showed favoritism for Dr. Murray."


Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

 

Add a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
9 Responses to "Journalists detained to keep them from pestering doctor for Michael Jackson"
Get a lawyer. Sue them.

If you don't, then it will only get worse.

Written by: Angry@Sherm on Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM -- Report abuse
Freedom of the of the press? i like it, but people should also have freedom of privacy.
Written by: JAmbo on Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009 at 12:54 PM -- Report abuse
If you want privacy, behave.
Written by: Thomas Mitchell
“If you want privacy, behave?” Guilty until proven innocent?

If you’re going to act like paparazzi, expect to be treated like one.
Written by: Jerry Sturdivant on Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009 at 9:36 AM -- Report abuse
@ Sturdivant: Sitting in court and following Dr. Murray out of court for comment after a proceeding is NOT "paparazzi". The hallways in that courthouse are large, there would be no safety hazard.

@ JAmbo: There is no such thing as "freedom of privacy". If you mean a 'right to privacy', there is none in public proceedings, unless they are under seal, which these proceedings were not.
Written by: Legally UnBound on Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009 at 4:08 PM -- Report abuse
Hey Sturdivant why don't you try being more forth right. Like your long time freindship with the supervisor. Pay back for all those favors he did for you.

That supervisor should have been fired years ago. He has falsified court information for years. Stolen from the county. Lied on his credentenials.

The media should research this guy's background really well. You'll find alot of squirrles in the wood pile. All those officials who helped with his rise in power to make these stupid decisions without authorization.

He is an embarrassment for all that work there. Start with his former employer LVPD (1980's).
Written by: RUKIDDING on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009 at 8:00 AM -- Report abuse
"Arrive on a scene and identify yourself as a newspaper or television representative and you will be corralled along with others of your ilk in some isolated area out of view of the scene...

Meanwhile, ordinary citizens are allowed to come and go at will."

Oh B.S.
Written by: Mike Ault on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009 at 9:54 AM -- Report abuse
> Hey Sturdivant why don't you try being more forth right.
> Like your long time freindship with the supervisor.
> Pay back for all those favors he did for you.

I have no more idea who you’re talking about.
Written by: Jerry Sturdivant on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009 at 4:45 PM -- Report abuse
I am amazed that only eight people commented. Seldom in my life have I heard of such an direct assault on an essential freedom. Obviously the privledged few have lost it's fear of the power of the press. Or maybe, as witnessed by the past several years of biased political reporting, they feel like they own the press. Reminds me of a cartoon about John Ensign I just read in the Review Journal.
Written by: Jerry S. on Tuesday, Nov. 24, 2009 at 4:28 PM -- Report abuse
Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites
More Blogs