While we are on the topic of requesting public information for consumers of our monopoly electricity utility, could one of the sharp pencils at NV Energy or the Public Utility Commission estimate the ancillary costs of intermittent power?
Recently the Review-Journal asked for the contract price NV Energy proposes to pay several alternative energy producers for each kilowatt-hour of electricity it must buy to satisfy a legislative dictate that 25 percent of its power production must come from so-called “green” sources. On Tuesday the attorney general’s office filed paperwork arguing that the public’s right to and need for such information outweighs any vague argument about trade or proprietary secrets. The PUC is to decide soon whether you get to see what your future power bills will look like.
While geothermal and biomass can provide a fairly stable, round-the-clock source of power, wind turbines work only when the wind blows and solar photovoltaic panels only when the sun shines. When the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine, the power company must crank up some other generator, usually a perfectly good coal- or natural gas-fired generator that was sitting idle while those carbon-free turbines were momentarily working.
What is the pass-along-to-consumers capital cost of maintaining generation capacity that is used only as needed? What is the cost in manpower and high-tech equipment to maintain a balanced power load on the grid? What are the capital and operating costs of all those additional power lines to bring green energy to the grid?
Just for the record: How much would have each of the kilowatt-hours from those proposed-but-moth-balled coal-fired plants near Ely have cost ratepayers?
Check out this graphic and read more about green economics:
Ken Zweibel
GW Solar Institute
Ken Zweibel
GW Solar Institute
Now do your readers want to be on the wrong side of this trend?
here's the definitive article on it
...http://www.postgazette.com/pg/10161/1064486-109.stm#ixzz0qU5NgjyU
Solar; wind and hydro electric are considered Base Load and they're 'on line' whenever they can be because they're the cheapest per KWH (regardless of your incorrect graphic). As the system peaks; the cheapest power is ramped up. Occasionally this is contracted purchased power (the very thing that doomed the crooked ENRON company).
By the way; electric utilities are not monopolies because they're control by the PUC and federal regulations.
Great work if you can get taxpayer money to produce an inferior product, at a higher cost, and force the populace to pay. Corn for fuel comes to mind.
The sticky point are those unintended consequences, aren't they?
By the way, who does the PUC answer to? And isn't it conveniently confusing to have over 100,000 pages of federal regulation?
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Comments (8)
Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Share your thoughts on this story.
Sign in or register to make a comment.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.