Two weeks ago readers of the Complete Las Vegan will have noted this prescient sentence in a Sunday column:
"Watching Republicans and Democrats on tee-vee talk health care with the president last week reminded me of how much national recognition Sen. John Ensign's affair cost him and Nevada. John would have swung a big bat at that table. Instead, he's relegated to the shadows, a disgraced senator who doesn't matter much.
"Assuming there's not a legal shoe to drop in the form of an indictment for the way he stupidly handled the exit of his lover's husband from his staff (and I don't make that assumption, by the way), I'm not sure where John goes from here? ... "
Now comes the NYT's piece this evening in which the lede reads: "WASHINGTON — Previously undisclosed e-mail messages turned over to the F.B.I. and Senate ethics investigators provide new evidence about Senator John Ensign’s efforts to steer lobbying work to the embittered husband of his former mistress and could deepen his legal and political troubles."
Deepen his trouble? No kidding.
Where is your admission that losing Senator Reid (Senate Leader) will be a larger loss of power for Nevada?
Where is the fair and balanced? Or is this all an admission that your newspaper equates to FOX for being a right wing voice for the Republican party?
Serious question here; does ANYONE believe that there is a SINGLE writer on this "newspaper" assigned to actually do some INVESTIGATION of senator hair, and his theft of taxpayer dollars while he was committing adultery?
And, take a guess as to how much time other reporters have for the Democratic Majority leader in the Senate?
Course, remember, according to the buggywhip here this is one of THE "most objective newspapers in the country"
Geesh.
Wait a minute. That's not such a bad idea?
I call censorship!
Course, this is just my "theory".
buggywhip
I KNOW THAT "one of the most objective newspapers in the country" would NEVER HAVE INTENTIONALLY BUCKLED UNDER TO PRESSURE FROM THE "good" senator and taken this story down; would it?
I call censorship!
But, hey, that's just my "theory".







RSS
Comments (8)
Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Share your thoughts on this story.
Sign in or register to make a comment.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.