Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Sunny Sunny, 102° Weather Forecast

Sherman Frederick
Sherman Frederick is a columnist for Stephens Media. His column appears Sunday in the Opinion section of the Review-Journal. In between Sundays, you can find out what's on his mind here.

Read the columns
View all blog entries
May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr    
  01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Lobbying? I'm shocked. SHOCKED!

Let's talk about the mysteries of lobbying.

Sen. John Ensign's soap opera sexcapades made front page news again last week. The New York Times reported that as a weird kind of make-good for poking Doug Hampton's wife, Cindy, Sen. Ensign set up Doug into a Las Vegas lobbying business and promised him three big clients from which to start. But, as the world turned, Doug felt his former boss only made good on two of the clients thereby forcing him to reveal the scheme.

Ensign ain't sayin' nothin' in part, I suspect, because he finds himself in potential deeper trouble as political opponents sense an ethics violation turning into an illegal lobbying deal. Funny how political opponents recoil at the lapses of enemies, but not their friends ... Dodd, Frank, Rangel ... oh my!

But I will not use double standards to excuse anyone's failure to do the public good.

If Ensign did so, he should suffer the consequences (whatever it is).

But let's just remember a few things. Sen. Harry Reid was the subject of a lot of attention from the L.A. Times regarding the lobbying efforts of his sons. Feel free to review the story here. He should get the same attention and treatment (whatever it is).

And while we're on the warpath, let's not overlook the center of the planet for lobbying efforts -- the White House. Remember when wanna-be president Barack Obama placed his hand over his heart and told voters how he was going to root out lobbyists and make 100 percent sure they didn't have a seat at the table of government decision making?

That was a campaign lie.

Lobbyists have been part of back-room deals with Obama and his Administration from Day One. For a pretty good rundown, for example, of how the brother of the architect of Obama's transition team, John Podesta, has made a killing lobbying the White House, take a look at this Frank Rich column. It's an eye-opener.

Pay special note to how former Sen. Tom Daschle avoids registering as a lobbyist (wink-wink).

Want to expose back-room deals and other sins of lobbying?

I'm with you, sister. But listen, we're gonna need more than this shovel. We're going to need some heavy equipment.

And, before we start the inspection, forgive me if I burlesque this important commentary: "There's lobbying going on? I'm shocked. SHOCKED!"

Comments (5)

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.

Share your thoughts on this story.

Sign in or register to make a comment.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

5 Responses to "Lobbying? I'm shocked. SHOCKED!"
The day lobbyists are out of work, our country is no longer a capitalist country. I'm not fond of them, but at least they don't lie about who they are, what they do, or what their goals are.
Written by: cili on Sunday, Oct. 04, 2009 at 10:21 PM -- Report abuse
Sherm is right about this one. Watch it Sherm, you could be called a racist for pointing out that BO may not have been totally truthful....
Written by: Martin on Monday, Oct. 05, 2009 at 6:26 AM -- Report abuse
What Republican is going to be your next whipping boy>
Certainly enough said about Sen. Ensign.
You have no proof outside of infidelity that he has not done his job.
Find a Democrat to pick on Like no do Harry Reid. He supports illegals to me that is a big deal.
Written by: gambler on Monday, Oct. 05, 2009 at 10:13 AM -- Report abuse
Sorry Cili but you're wrong. We can get along quite well without lobbyists and all three of the traits you mentioned are wrong. They are all about giving someone a louder voice than yours, and in many cases, they enrich and corrupt our representatives at someone else's expense.

At one time, they may have been hired to inform congress of facts they didn't know so they could vote with more complete knowledge. Many claim that they do that today but it is agenda driven now. Tariffs are an example of successful lobbying. It protects and/or gives an advantage over competitors which the government should really stay out of.

If you read the links provided in the blog, you can see how lobbying positions are a way to enrich family members to curry favor from a powerful, buyable politician.

Let's get rid of the lobbyists and see what happens.
Written by: spike on Monday, Oct. 05, 2009 at 3:26 PM -- Report abuse
Had the federal government stayed within its Constitutional restraints, there would be a lot less reason for anyone to lobby congress, especially for regulatory legislation.

Written by: Winston.Smith on Tuesday, Oct. 06, 2009 at 1:57 PM -- Report abuse
More Blogs