Kathleen Vermillion said Wednesday afternoon that her teenage daughter stands by her assertion that County Commissioner Steve Sisolak behaved inappropriately. But the former Henderson city councilwoman also said she regrets having her daughter give a videotaped deposition in the battle with her ex-boyfriend.
Here’s the content of two Wednesday interviews with Vermillion after I reached her by cell: "My daughter is at a soccer game right now, and I have not had the opportunity to speak to her," Vermillion said. When told of the existence of the Boutin affidavit she said, "I feel like this is a lynching. ... I can’t do this anymore."
She then launched into an accusation-filled statement about her ex-husband, accusing him of having a "criminal background" and of failing to make his "mandated child support payments."
"This is not a man of upstanding moral character," Vermillion said, noting that she has primary custody of her daughter.
After being read the essential elements of Boutin’s statement, Vermillion admitted, "I’m not saying there’s no truth to it. In hindsight, after having my daughter hurt to the degree that she was, I never should have allowed a video deposition."
After speaking to her daughter, Vermillion said the teen states that nothing she "said during the interview was untruthful. She does say she felt pressured by me to conduct the video deposition, but she stands by the content of it."
Vermillion added, "And in retrospect, having done a video deposition and having seen what’s occurred over the past week for both of us, we would have never agreed to a video deposition."
When reminded that she can be overheard on the unedited tape appearing to coach her daughter, Vermillion said, "I asked her questions that still are very concerning to me."
The mother then reiterated that her daughter’s "comments were absolutely accurate."
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
My case set the legal precedent for any defamation action Sisolak may seek.
It's the case law precedent for a defamation action I recommend Sisolak file against the woman.
Her daughter's abuse .... A LIE
Her stealing from the Charity ....A LIE
Come On Man !!!







RSS
Comments (18)
Share your thoughts on this story.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.