RSS
Twitter
Facebook
E-mail Alerts
Are Nevada gaming regulators over reacting by saying an iPhone blackjack card-counting program turns the technology into a cheating device?
One former state gaming agent, now a casino security consultant, called the program a toy. Bill Zender, who operates Last Resort Consulting, said the device is not a danger to the gaming industry.
“To compare an iPhone to a concealable computer like the ‘David’ or ‘Casey’ is inconceivable,” Zender wrote in an e-mail.
Sunday’s Inside Gaming column detailed a memorandum the Nevada Gaming Control Board sent to casino operators last week warning of the device. The program can be downloaded to either the Apple iPhone or iPod Touch and uses four different strategies for card counting.
It isn’t illegal to count cards in Nevada casinos. However, using an electronic device to assist on counting makes the activity a felony. Gaming Control Board member Randy Sayre said casino security officers can detain anyone caught using the iPhone card counting program and they can be arrested by state gaming agents.
Zender, who also worked as a casino executive at the Aladdin, said gaming regulators may have over reacted to the program’s dangers.
“Unfortunately, in their diligence to provide their licensees with current information, both the Nevada Gaming Control Board and the California Department of Justice, have increased the casinos’ paranoia for card counting to a new level,” Zender said.
He added that casino operators and card room operators in California and Nevada have begun expressing concerns about the iPhone.
The Associated Press, MSNBC, CNN Radio and Fox News put out stories about the iPhone program based on Sunday’s Inside Gaming column.
Zender is worried that casino patrons may get wrongly accused of something other than just normally using an iPhone.
“How soon will it be before a customer is detained by security because he or she was simply text messaging their friend from the general proximity of a blackjack table?” Zender asked. “Worse yet, what about the possibility that this person will be arrested for possession of a cheating device which is a felony?”
With Nevada’s economy reeling, it makes no sense to give casinos something else to be paranoid about. The paranoia this will fuel will result in many “good casino customers” (suckers) being hassled, and everyone with a cell phone to be looked upon as a possible criminal. This gives casinos another excuse to harass patrons, which will result in the typical cases of casino abuse. Lawsuits will of course follow, costing the casino industry far more money than letting a few wannabe card counters play. The Gaming Control Board again exposes itself as a laughingstock.
I had all know card count systems programmed into a BJ simulator and ran 20,000,000 hands for 1,2,4,6 and 8 decks of cards for each of 38 differest sets of rules. (took me three years) If the i-pod program was programmed by experts . . . then IT IS NOT A TOY!
Why doesn't the GCB download the program, become an expert in its use, ask a casino to let them use it on a live game to play a maximum of three 6_deck shoes. (I assume that the i-pod program also calculates the players proficiency. If not such programs are currently in use in Nevada casino.) Win or lose the players proficiency at the card count system tells all.
FYI: The Advanced Omega II CCS is the best in the world. Experience tells me that if the program is valid for a maximum of an
I had all know card count systems programmed into a BJ simulator and ran 20,000,000 hands for 1,2,4,6 and 8 decks of cards for each of 38 differest sets of rules. (took me three years) If the i-pod program was programmed by experts . . . then IT IS NOT A TOY!
Why doesn't the GCB download the program, become an expert in its use, ask a casino to let them use it on a live game to play a maximum of three 6_deck shoes. (I assume that the i-pod program also calculates the players proficiency. If not such programs are currently in use in Nevada casino.) Win or lose the players proficiency at the card count system tells all.
FYI: The Advanced Omega II CCS is the best in the world. Experience tells me that if the program is valid for a maximum of an
I had all know card count systems programmed into a BJ simulator and ran 20,000,000 hands for 1,2,4,6 and 8 decks of cards for each of 38 differest sets of rules. (took me three years) If the i-pod program was programmed by experts . . . then IT IS NOT A TOY!
Why doesn't the GCB download the program, become an expert in its use, ask a casino to let them use it on a live game to play a maximum of three 6_deck shoes. (I assume that the i-pod program also calculates the players proficiency. If not such programs are currently in use in Nevada casino.) Win or lose the players proficiency at the card count system tells all.
FYI: The Advanced Omega II CCS is the best in the world. Experience tells me that if the program is valid for a maximum of an
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.