Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Clear Clear, 87° Weather Forecast

Vin Suprynowicz is a nationally syndicated Libertarian columnist and author. He explores questions on constitutional freedoms in his Sunday column in Viewpoints/Opinon.

Read the columns
View all blog entries
May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr    
  01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
There they go again

I see where "conservative" Republicans on Washington's budget cutting "supercommittee" have offered to "compromise" by embracing $300 billion to $500 billion in tax hikes pretty much right away, in exchange for Democratic promises of more of the kind of "spending cuts" that leave federal spending higher than it was before the "cuts" -- with most said "cuts" to be phased in between 2018 and 2021.

Since this has been tried before, resulting in our current slow-motion economic collapse and ruin (most heavily impacting the hard-working, blue-collar, lower middle class, who wouldn't vote Libertarian if you hit them over the head with a four-square beam, an exercise now well under way), why don't Republicans propose a new type of "compromise," in which Democrats agree to the kind of spending cuts that result in total federal spending dropping by 40 to 60 percent, "phased in" in late 2011 and early 2012, in return for which Republicans promise, "cross our hearts and hope to die," that they or whoever holds their offices at the time will embrace "massive tax hikes on the rich" -- in 2020 and 2021?

Giggle giggle snort.

The common wisdom is that Republicans don't try it this way because they're stupid. In fact, their personal greed for wealth and the percs of power certainly exceed their desire to leave other people's children with more economic opportunity (or even as much) as our parents enjoyed, but they're not "stupid" in the "my two pair beat your four-of-a-kind!" sense that's meant.

The more sensible explanation is that Republicrats want more tax loot to spend in order to buy themselves re-election, the same as any Demopublican. The only difference is that Republicrats have to maintain the POSE of aiming to reduce government size and power, which requires them to occasionally look like clowns in oversized shoes trying to find their asses with both hands, a price they will gladly pay in exchange for brief six-figure "retirement" jobs working for their favorite lobbyists, followed up with those grandiose and eternal federal pensions.

Comments (1)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
1 Response to "There they go again"
Because I know of the interest that this particular bit of information holds on this blog, I offer it for everyone's amusement:

"The company behind the film Atlas Shrugged Part 1 is replacing 1,000 title sheets from the film's newly released DVD and Blue Ray versions because the copy writer incorrectly described the late Ayn Rand's 1957 novel, Atlas Shrugged, as a story of "self-sacrifice."

As we all know, the late Ms. Rand is now rolling over in the federally paid for grave where she was laid at the thought that she sacrificed anything for anyone.

Written by: beentheredonethat on Monday, Nov. 14, 2011 at 5:29 PM -- Report abuse
More Blogs