Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
Business


DOING A LITTLE SOL SEARCHING

'Green power' rules have California considering Nevada for solar plants

Energy developers are staking their claims to major swaths of the Mojave Desert in Nevada, California and Arizona in an effort to exploit California's growing demand for solar power.

The reason?


Most Popular Stories
  • Buyout to take casino parent private
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • Chase makes takeover official
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • CityCenter licensing gets own hearing
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Vote paves way for LV-style casinos in Ohio
  • Holiday office parties take hit




  • California's aggressive renewable energy portfolio standard, which forces electric utilities to use more energy from the sun, wind and other renewable resources, is a key factor, said Charles Ricker, senior vice president of BrightSource Energy, an Oakland, Calif.-based designer and builder of solar power plants.

    California utilities must obtain 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2015.

    "This is just a huge market for clean power," said John O'Donnell, executive vice president of Ausra, an independent developer based in Palo Alto, Calif.

    This section of the Mojave Desert is "nestled between two huge electric marketplaces, Las Vegas and Los Angeles," Ricker said.

    Unlike Nevada, where three coal-fired power plants are planned, California prohibits investor-owned utilities from entering long-term contracts for power from coal plants because of the massive quantities of carbon dioxide coal plants emit. California intends to rely mostly on natural gas-fired plants for the power it cannot obtain from renewable energy sources, O'Donnell said.

    In recent rapid-fire succession:

    * Ausra promised to develop 1,000 megawatts of solar power and said it is particularly interested in sites near Boulder City.

    * FPL Group, the parent of Florida Power & Light Co., said it would invest $1.5 billion in new solar thermal facilities in Florida and California.

    * PG&E Corp. joined FPL and Ausra to outline their commitment to solar thermal power development during President Clinton's recent global initiative in New York. The San Francisco utility holding company said it would tap an additional 1,000 megawatts of solar thermal power over the next five years. It is negotiating with several unidentified companies. PG&E noted that the 1,000 megawatts will come on top of earlier announcements to buy 1,000 megawatts of solar power from BrightSource Energy of Oakland and Solel of Israel.

    Solel is looking at three sites in the California portion of the Mojave Desert for a 553-megawatt plant that will sell power to PG&E. BrightSource Energy has filed an application for construction with the California Energy Commission for a 400-megawatt solar power plant in California's Ivanpah Valley near Primm.

    Acciona Energy spurred development of solar thermal power plants in the Southwest with the successful completion of the 64-megawatt Nevada Solar One power plant in the Eldorado Valley of Boulder City, Acciona spokeswoman Lena Stinsa said. It was the largest solar thermal plant built in 16 years.

    Stinsa cited other reasons for the surge in solar power development: legislative support for solar power, awareness of climate change related to greenhouse gas emissions from conventional power plants, concern about energy security and rising costs of fossil fuels. Acciona plans to build a second phase at the power plant, she said.

    Reuters has reported that the Bureau of Land Management has received rights-of-way requests for more than 300,000 acres of California desert for 34 large solar plants totaling 24,000 megawatts, but analysts say many of the projects will not be completed.

    Ausra's first $500 million, 175-megawatt plant will be in central California. But O'Donnell said the company intends to build others outside of California, possibly near Boulder City, and potentially in Arizona or New Mexico. Within 100 miles of the plants, Ausra intends to establish a manufacturing plant for the solar thermal units.

    Gov. Jim Gibbons has told Western governors that he wants to not only develop renewable power for use not only for use in Nevada but also for export, O'Donnell said.

    Southern Nevada is close to transmission lines leading to California.

    "Transmission is the biggest challenge in figuring out where to put these plants," the Ausra executive said. Many areas with renewable energy have not been developed because they are so far from transmission lines that would carry the power to cities.

    If Ausra develops solar thermal plants to sell in Nevada, it would build along a planned transmission line that Sierra Pacific Resources plans to build to Las Vegas or a smaller transmission line that the Southern Nevada Water Authority proposes to build for pumping water that will be piped to Las Vegas from Northern Nevada.

    "Almost no place on the planet is growing faster than Clark County, Nevada," O'Donnell said.

    O'Donnell said Ausra can generate power from solar thermal plants for 10 cents a kilowatt hour, about half the cost of power from photovoltaic systems.

    Nevada Power spokesman Adam Grant said: "We're very interested in progress being made on the solar front, especially if there's any indication in the cost being driven down."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Ranndy T wrote on October 04, 2007 06:40 PM: Please send information, thank you.

    RTMG


    Report abuse

    dog wrote on October 03, 2007 10:50 PM: wwgd ? i think solar energy.


    Report abuse

    Godess wrote on October 03, 2007 10:51 AM: God- I would look more into how regulations on transmission line work before you continue to spout out wrong information about energy tracking capabilities.


    Report abuse

    GOD wrote on October 03, 2007 09:22 AM: California not accepting power from coal power plants is such a crock. Like they know where the power is coming from. They (CA) accept coal-fired power as far away as the CO/UT, Mexican, and Canadian border. Once the power is on the grid, power hungry CA are likes pigs at the trough, they don't care where it came from although the green rhetoric is amusing at best.