Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
Business


Maryland governor sees slot solution to budget woes

Proposal could bring 9,500 machines

Maryland's governor officially put his state on the radar screen for gaming expansion.

In calling for a special session of the legislature to deal with a $1.7 billion budget shortfall, Gov. Martin O'Malley wants lawmakers to legalize slot machines with the tax revenues used to reduce the deficit.


Most Popular Stories
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • REAL ESTATE: Short sales on the rise
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Airport suffers another decline




  • The initial idea proposed by the governor could bring 9,500 slot machines to Maryland racetracks and other locations. But the matter has been met with opposition and the state has failed in several attempts to bring slot machines to the market.

    In a note to investors Tuesday, Wachovia Capital Markets gaming analyst Brian McGill said he thought the issue might not be resolved until Maryland lawmakers meet in their regular 90-day session starting in January.

    "Slots has been a rather controversial issue in Maryland," McGill said. "It remains to be seen whether or not a plan can be agreed on to legalize slots and balance the budget in a special session. As of now, our contacts are not confident it can be accomplished."

    According to The Washington Post, the president of the state Senate and the speaker of assembly, both Democrats, opposed the special session and the slot machine proposal. However, both would be in favor of placing a slot machine referendum on the state's November 2008 general election ballot.

    The governor, who is also a Democrat, thought the slot machines, which would be housed at racetracks in four Maryland counties, could generate gaming tax revenues of $550 million for state budget coffers. No tax rate percentage was given.

    Nevada's slot machine makers, hungry for any signs of domestic gambling expansion, said Maryland's proposal would create a need for a significant number of gambling devices.

    "It's a decent number and it would be a new market," Bally Technologies spokesman Marcus Prater said. "Maryland has been down this road before and we're a long way from shipping machines. But it seems to be headed in the right direction."

    Prater said a 20 percent market share of the potential Maryland sot market could be worth $24 million to Bally Technologies.

    A statewide referendum on slots would add to a growing list of gaming expansion referendums nationally, including potential votes in California, Miami and Baton Rouge, La.

    Gaming analysts thought letting Maryland voters decide if they want slot machines might be a way of seeing the matter pass. The slot machines could be located at racetracks in counties where a majority of the voters were in favor of the issue.

    Bear Stearns gaming analyst Joe Greff said letting the voters decide might give politicians some cover. He said the assembly speaker's opposition might soften if the voters decide they want the machines.

    "In a move to gain more backing for his slot proposal, in recent weeks, the governor has said he will support a statewide referendum on the issue," Greff said in a note to investors.

    Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or (702) 477-3871.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 0 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.