Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

Business


CORRECTION, 11/21/07 -- A story in Tuesday's Business section contained an error. Texas-based developer Christopher Milam was seeking approval to build a 1,150-foot-high hotel tower on the Wet n' Wild site. The Federal Aviation Administration is recommending that any project built on the site be no more than 1,064 feet high.

Strip tower given a trim

FAA slices 500 feet off proposed height of Crown Las Vegas

A Texas-based developer's dream of building the tallest building west of the Mississippi River on the old Wet 'n Wild site on the Strip took a big hit Monday after federal officials lopped nearly 500 feet off the project's proposed height.

The Federal Aviation Administration said Crown Las Vegas's planned hotel tower could be 1,064 feet high, the agency said in a letter to developer Christopher Milam.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • Harrah's Entertainment plans to lay off more workers
  • Casinos must wait for $800,000
  • $475 MILLION FOR SANDS: Loan fails to impress investors
  • FAA: Planes can't fly these crowded skies
  • PLAZA VERSUS PLAZA
  • Macau's drop-off hurting Las Vegas
  • Vegas atop home-price record drop
  • INSIDE GAMING: Forty days, 40 nights and a cry of protest
  • Greenspun Media Group lays off up to 10 percent of staff
  • Battle on tip sharing on tap



  • Milam had originally hoped to build a 1,888-foot-high tower but lowered his sights to 1,550 feet in a letter to the FAA dated Sept. 14.

    The Stratosphere, less than a mile north of the Wet 'n Wild site and the tallest structure in the West, is 1,149 feet tall.

    The FAA considered approach and takeoff paths for all airports in the county, including McCarran International Airport and Nellis Air Force Base, while considering Crown Las Vegas' request. The agency said a tower higher than 1,064 would pose a hazard to air navigation in Clark County.

    Milam declined to comment on the FAA decision Monday pending hearings before Clark County officials.

    If Milam and his partners don't file an appeal of the FAA decision by Dec. 19, the agency's determination will become final Dec. 29. An appeal could also be filed by other interested parties such as airlines.

    Clark County Commissioners were scheduled to hold a hearing on the project today, but the item was held pending appeals.

    Milam first brought plans for his 1,888-foot tower before the Clark County Planning Commission in November 2006. The commission approved the $5 billion, 5,000-unit mixed-use project for use permits and design reviews pending an FAA determination on the height issue.

    As a matter of policy, the County Commission does not issue waivers to allow buildings to exceed FAA recommended height limits, but it can set lower height limits.

    The new height recommendation replaces an earlier FAA decision arguing that any structure on the site that was higher than 708 feet would pose a hazard to air traffic in the area.

    FAA spokesman Ian Gregor said the new limit does not set a precedent for other developers to build 1,000-foot projects up and down the Strip.

    "It really depends on the location," he said. "You can't say this clears the way for other similar construction because every building review is based on its own characteristics."

    Paul Murad, a resident of Turnberry Place bordering the site to the south, said he wishes the FAA had kept the lower height.

    However, issues of environmental impact and traffic flow for the area are bigger concerns for area residents, he said.

    "It's about sustainability," Murad said. "It would be very helpful if we could see a model. We would feel a lot more comfortable about the future of the area."

    Milam held a series of meetings in early November with residents in the area who will be affected by the project while waiting for a ruling from the FAA.

    Crown Las Vegas is a partnership between Milam's Austin, Texas-based IDM Properties, Australian billionaire James Packer's Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd., and New York-based private equity firm York Capital Management.

    The Wet 'n Wild site is currently being leased by its owner, Archon Corp., as a construction site for the neighboring $2.8 billion Fontainebleau project.

    Milam and Archon entered into an option agreement in June 2006 of $450 million for the site. The price was raised in the summer to $475 million adjusting for rising land costs.

    Contact reporter Arnold M. Knightly at aknightly@reviewjournal.com or (702) 477-3893.



    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Jason Voorhees wrote on November 20, 2007 07:01 PM:


    Really. Well, as a pilot I can tell you that there are very real reasons that tall buildings are restricted from the area in the line of or near the approaches of runways. The FARs were not created because a lot of pilots had nothing better to do with their time. The FARs are to improve flight safety.

    It is unlikely that the FAA is acting in an arbitrary or capricious way in concluding that a maximum safe height exists for a man made structure in its proximity to the runways.

    The mountains in the area are at a distance that can easily be navigated by departing and approaching aircraft.

    Further, your former comments belie the putative thoughts in your latter statements. Let the professionals do their jobs.





    Tom, Burbank wrote on November 20, 2007 05:52 PM: Jason, you've extrapolated a bit irrationally. I want the FAA to continue to do their job, but not to have control over anything else. We can have tall buildings AND safe air travel. Skyscrapers aren't aircraft magnets, they're just tall buildings. Las Vegas is surrounded by mountains and planes successfully fly in and out of the city every day - thanks to the FAA and well-trained pilots.


    Jason Voorhees wrote on November 20, 2007 04:57 PM:

    Sure. Unless, of course, you happen to be on one of the aircraft that is no longer subject to regulations, and you and your family have a fire filled death in a plane crash because no one makes sure flight safety rules are followed.

    The scary part is that you people are for real. The positive aspect is that you represent part of the problem, not the solution, and most rational people see you for what you are.


    Publius wrote on November 20, 2007 10:54 AM: Tom,

    I like your spirit. This is the kind of thinking that our country needs more of. Instead of all the hand-wringing, "what can the government give me next" kind of attitude that's been encouraged since the early 90's (or earlier, depending on what part of the country you were living in.) I think 2 generations of independent thinkers have been destroyed by big government. What'll happen, FAA, when we can no longer afford to fly airplanes? What will become of your administration? How about figuring out a way to get out of the way?


    Tom, Burbank wrote on November 20, 2007 10:17 AM: Why is the FAA allowed to determine the height of a building? It's just another government department regulating the U.S. into second rate world status. The tallest buildings in the world are in now Asia and Dubai while we cower in fear of the FAA. America used to be proud of the being the biggest and tallest. I hope Milam builds the tallest building in the world, and that he does it in Las Vegas. And that it's a true functioning building, not a useless tower like Stratosphere. Also, who cares what people who live in Turnberry Place think?