Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

sponsored by
Business


Reid's coal battle on hold

Nevada Republicans generate opposition

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Harry Reid's bid to block coal-fired power plants being planned in Eastern Nevada has been shelved -- at least for now.

A Reid amendment that would have stymied the energy projects by redesignating the Great Basin National Park to the most protective federal air quality levels ran into opposition that was encouraged by Nevada's three Republicans in Congress.


Most Popular Stories
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • Home sales, median prices rise in valley
  • NEVADA ECONOMY: State showing some life at last
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • MARKETPLACE: Herbst Gaming reduces staff
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Michigan resident is youngest to win World Series of Poker Main Event
  • Pinnacle CEO resigns




  • Consequently, the provision was left out of a year-end budget bill that was made public on Monday and faces final votes this week.

    Instead, the bill contains a compromise that calls for the General Accountability Office to evaluate air quality at the national park outside Ely and to recommend whether it should receive a new designation.

    The compromise essentially delays any congressional action on the coal plants into next year. In the meantime, developers will continue to seek environmental permissions from the state and from the Bureau of Land Management to move forward.

    Reid, the Senate majority leader, launched a campaign this year to elevate the use of renewable sources of power, such as solar and wind, in Nevada. He said he would be back to fight against what he called "dirty coal power plants."

    He expressed confidence the GAO will recommend that the Great Basin Park, created in 1986 with a lesser clean air standard, should be redesignated to Class 1 for visibility and air quality.

    "This is an important step toward ensuring that the park remains pristine for future generations," Reid said in a statement. "When the investigation is finished and the park's classification has been changed, this will be one more roadblock to those who wish to foul Nevada's air with the construction of dirty coal power plants."

    Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., and Reps. Dean Heller and Jon Porter, both R-Nev., marshaled opposition by Republican leaders when Reid's amendment came to light this month. Reid had vowed over the summer to do "everything I can" to stop construction of coal plants in the state, prompting their action.

    The Republican lawmakers maintained coal should remain in Nevada's energy strategy as a provider of baseload electricity while investors continue to weigh increasing development of geothermal, wind and solar power.

    The GOP members got behind Sierra Pacific Resources, which is planning the $3.8 billion Ely Energy Center, which would generate 1,500 megawatts using coal as fuel. Electricity would be moved through a new transmission system linking Nevada Power in the south and Sierra Pacific Power in the north.

    "We really do believe that the Ely Energy Center is right for Nevada and for our customers," Chelsie Campbell, a Nevada Power spokeswoman, said Monday.

    Gov. Jim Gibbons believes that state and federal environmental laws are working and that the developers should be allowed to help meet the state's energy needs if they comply with those laws, said spokeswoman Melissa Subbotin.

    Gibbons wants a "balance between protection of wilderness and providing affordable energy to meet the state's growing needs," she said. "We're looking for new alternative ways to meet the needs of the state."

    Reid also was gunning for a 1,600-megawatt plant being developed by LS Power about 25 miles north of Ely. Eric Crawford, director of project development for LS Power Group, declined comment because the legislation has not been completed.

    A third project is being planned about 240 miles south of Ely by Sithe Global Power, of New York.

    Ensign would not comment on the compromise but a spokesman said he was satisfied with it.

    Heller said involving the GAO also will give Congress a chance to have a voice on the matter. House lawmakers who worked against Reid complained he was trying to get the air quality restrictions passed without discussing it with them.

    "The more information we can have, the better," Heller said. "Hopefully we can discuss it in committee. That was my argument in the first place. This is an issue that has to be discussed. There are a lot of implications to a coal plant in Ely."

    "I just want to make sure we have the proper debate," Porter said. "The GAO report will provide additional information and there needs to be scrutiny of the coal plants."

    A congressional official familiar with the matter said the compromise also buys the power companies time to move their projects forward, perhaps out of Reid's reach.

    "I am not saying this thing would be over by any means, but for them to be able to finish the permitting process is a big deal," the official said.

    LS Power expects to receive a state air quality permit imminently. A hearing on the Ely Energy Center is scheduled for next month.

    But environmental groups have signaled they are preparing to fight the air quality permits in court, said Charles Benjamin, Nevada director of Western Resources Advocates, which opposes the coal projects.

    "There are so many uncertainties out there with regards to the coal plants that it is impossible for anybody to predict," Benjamin said. "The final air permits will be challenged and this process is going to unfold over a long period of time."

    White Pine County Clerk Donna Bath said the area desperately needs the power plants to boost tax revenue for local government because the area has been in receivership for 21/2 years.

    "We've had several cuts, and we're trying to do the best we can," she said. The tax rate has reached the cap and cannot be raised, but 97 percent of the land belongs to the federal government or other entities that pay no taxes, she said. The Southern Nevada Water Authority may reduce the tax roll even more, because it has purchased ranches for water and is not subject to property taxes, she said.

    "I care deeply about our community," Bath said, "and we need the tax base and Nevada needs the energy."

    Review-Journal writer John G. Edwards contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    sm wrote on December 18, 2007 05:59 PM: the environmental wackos will try to stop the coal fired plant, and what makes you think they are going to let you build all these panels in southern nevada have you forgotten the desert (you can adopt me) tortoise. they want no growth.


    Report abuse

    Beytovin wrote on December 18, 2007 01:14 PM: Vegas Vic-

    If you're talking photovoltaic, you're correct about the storage after dark. But they've solved that dilemma with solar thermal. Spain is waaaaay ahead of us in implementing this new technology. We should be ashamed. But if we're not going to be ashamed, we should get off our a$$es and actually DO something. Start by writing our elected "representatives" and tell them to stay the hell out of the way of American ingenuity and ambition. Or else...


    Report abuse

    Harry (not Reid) wrote on December 18, 2007 10:30 AM: Thus, to supplant the ultimate buildout of Ely (at 2,500 Megawatts) with photovoltaic, it would require 25,000 acres of cells. That would be interesting.


    Report abuse

    GOD wrote on December 18, 2007 09:11 AM: 140 acres to power 10,000 homes (a more realistic assessment) -- PATHETIC.

    I like how Crazy Reid talks about "battles" and going up against the powerful power plants with one hand while he waves a white flag at terrorists and calls for surrender of America. Get more talking points from moveon.org you crazy old idiot!

    RESIGN NOW CRAZY HARRY --- YOU'VE LOST ALL RESPECT FROM NEVADA AND ALL OF AMERICA!!!


    Report abuse

    Lee wrote on December 18, 2007 07:00 AM: The Federal Government does own most of Nevada. Millions of acres. They lease this land out all the time of other things so leasing it out for Solar fields should be a easy thing to do.

    They built this 140 acre solar field in a little over four months. Much less time then it takes to build a coal fired plant.

    In the summer most of the power used is during the day so these solar fields can supply the needed power to keep this state going and be clean at the same time.


    Report abuse

    Vegas Vic wrote on December 18, 2007 04:56 AM: Using the figures from another R-J article, if it takes 140 acres to supply 13,000 homes with power from a photovoltaic system (solar cells), it will take 2,100 acres (3.28 square miles) to supply 200,000 homes. What I'd like to know is where Nevada is going to get all this acreage to build these "solar" plants when most of our land is government owned. Also, the cost of storage of power after dark is currently not feasible so the research on this technology has to greatly improve before solar cells could even START replacing coal or natural gas electric plants.