Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Business


Transmission corridors face another challenge

Environmental groups, which thought they were losing a federal chess game on transmission corridors, believe they have avoided checkmate with a new legal move.

The legal battle stems from the Department of Energy designation in October of transmission corridors of national interest.

The corridors cover large swaths of undeveloped and wilderness land in Arizona, California and mid-Atlantic states. The federal agency dropped Clark County as transmission corridor of national interest, but a state regulator said Nevada officials are watching challenges to the corridor designations with interest.

Environmental groups asked the DOE to reconsider its decision, but DOE has not set a deadline for responding to those requests, said Ann Atwood, staff attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity in Tucson, Ariz.


Most Popular Stories
  • Going, going ... not gone
  • Grand plans for big hotel
  • Home prices return to 2004 levels, market watcher says
  • THE STRIP: Tropicana owner bankrupt
  • Long Gaughan: El Cortez owner sells stake in downtown casino
  • At last, positive signs in housing
  • Station thinks big with Viva project
  • Off-Strip hotels push harder
  • HOUSING MARKET: Foreclosure wave loses steam
  • INSIDE GAMING: MGM Mirage may say 'take two'



  • Attorneys for environmentalists fear that transmission line projects will proceed in the Southwest corridor before DOE responds to the requests.

    The center, however, did not ask for DOE reconsideration. The center on Thursday signed a letter advising the government of plans to file a lawsuit alleging DOE violations of the Endangered Species Act.

    A list of 95 endangered species could be affected to the national transmission corridor designations, according to the center. They include the Arroyo Southwest toad, California tiger salamander, giant gartersnake and numerous plants.

    "While it doesn't directly affect Nevada, we're interested and we'll be tracking how that plays out," Public Utilities Commissioner Rebecca Wagner said.

    Lydia Ball, Nevada representative for the Sierra Club, compared the DOE's response to its dealing with foes of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste depository. In both cases, DOE has tried to frustrate public participation, which is key to government in the United States, she said.

    Contact reporter John G. Edwards at jedwards@reviewjournal.com or (702) 383-0420.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Vegas Vic wrote on December 22, 2007 03:13 AM: Bob, that's exactly the point. It takes around 3.28 square miles of solar cells to power just 13,000 homes, and using that figure and 2 million valley residents, that works out to 504.8 square miles of solar cells to power the Las Vegas valley homes. I haven't looked up the figures for wind turbines but just the eco-terrorist outcries against them because their blades hurt the poor birds flying around would be enough for dispute on their placement. The eco-terrorists won't be satisfied until there isn't ONE place in the U.S. where you can get AFFORDABLE electric power.


    Bob wrote on December 21, 2007 10:19 AM: The enviromentalists are worried about the impact of a transmission line, yet they want to cover the state in solar panels and wind turbines?