Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
Business


Officials discuss adding roads to, from Ivanpah airport site

A proposed commercial airport about 25 miles south of Las Vegas is expected to accommodate as many as 35 million Southern Nevada visitors annually.

But getting them to the resorts on Las Vegas Boulevard from the now-remote airport site in the Ivanpah Valley is another story.


Most Popular Stories
  • Buyout to take casino parent private
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • Chase makes takeover official
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • CityCenter licensing gets own hearing
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Vote paves way for LV-style casinos in Ohio
  • Holiday office parties take hit




  • When traffic is light, the proposed airport site along Interstate 15 between Jean and Primm is about 30 minutes by car from Tropicana Avenue, the closest major intersection on the Strip.

    But by 2017, the year the airport is scheduled to open for business, the notion of light traffic on the main freeway between Las Vegas and Los Angeles will be as quaint as dropping a quarter in a slot machine.

    That's why Nevada's transportation managers are so concerned about plans to move visitors between Las Vegas and the new airport without creating more congestion on roads that are already reaching their limits.

    On Wednesday, Clark County Department of Aviation officials explained their plans for new roads to and from the airport for a subcommittee of state legislators compiling a statewide report on transportation.

    In short, the Aviation Department plans to spend about $200 million on new roads and mass transportation rights-of-way to ensure tourists spend more time losing money in casinos and less time sitting in traffic.

    The highlight of the plan is a four-lane road that would depart I-15 near Sloan Road and lead directly into the new airport with no cross streets or interchanges.

    "Once you get onto that roadway, you can't get off," said Rosemary Vassiliadis, deputy director for the Clark County Department of Aviation. "It drops you right into ... the racetrack system in front of the terminal."

    Funding for the new roads, part of the $7 billion airport project, would come from fees attached to passengers' airfares. McCarran International Airport would continue to host most commercial airline traffic to and from Las Vegas, Ivanpah would accommodate international and long-haul domestic flights.

    In addition to the dedicated airport road to Ivanpah, called the Las Vegas Boulevard South Super Arterial, Clark County aviation officials are planning two other road upgrades.

    One is the Las Vegas Boulevard South bypass. It is designed mainly for locals driving between Goodsprings and Sandy Valley and Las Vegas who want to avoid the airport. The bypass would be two lanes in each direction and would connect to Goodsprings Road.

    The third proposal is an interchange that connects the airport and I-15.

    The proposed airport isn't the only change transportation planners are facing when it comes to I-15 between Las Vegas and the California border.

    "We have challenges on that corridor," said Susan Martinovich, director of the Nevada Department of Transportation.

    One challenge is the increase of trucks moving goods from Southern California seaports to Las Vegas, Salt Lake City and beyond.

    "Even without that airport the freight movement ... will double in the next 10 years," Martinovich said.

    There are plans to widen the freeway beginning as early as 2009. Eventually, some segments of I-15 between the Las Vegas Beltway and the California border will have as many as 14 lanes, she said.

    Other proposals for the corridor include suggestions for light rail, specialized buses and even a high-speed train that could go as fast as 300 miles per hour.

    "We intend to push the envelope in that corridor using every mode of transportation we can," Martinovich said.

    The meeting Wednesday was third in a series of five to gather information about the state transportation system for legislators to consider during the 2009 session.

    Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or (702) 477-3861.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    ths wrote on January 24, 2008 09:01 PM: Monorails do not cost a $150 million a mile. The original build number included the maintenance yard, stations, trains and a reserve fund. There are some great advantages check out http://www.monorails.org/tMspages/MonoVs.html

    Yes it is not fast enough in the form we have here, and you are right that we need to get out of the build more roads mode.

    That is why we should be pushing some sort of rail that runs to a hub at the current McCarran airport where we have the strip monorail, airport, bus depot, taxi pickup and rail to other airport and onto LA.


    Report abuse

    ths wrote on January 24, 2008 08:52 PM: $150million a mile is wrong. A lot of that money is stations, the control center and maintenance yard and the cost of the original monorail trains themselves. But you are right we need to look beyond todays way of roads, taxis and other conventional means.



    That is why you need a transit hub where you can get access to an airport, a high speed train to the other airport and possibly beyond to LA, the monorail to the strip, bus lines to the suburbs and when needed a taxi.




    Report abuse

    enginerd wrote on January 24, 2008 05:58 PM: Unfortunately we will never see the monorail extended to the new airport site. Among the many reasons (and there are far to many to list here) are cost ($150million/mile), speed of operation (the very best systems top out at 45-50 mph), the very powerful Taxicab Authority, historic lack of ridership on the existing system, and the lack of any real commitment to any form of mass transit in the Valley (my apologies to the RTC). Some new ordinances notwithstanding, the general policy in Clark County continues to promote urban sprawl and the use of/dependence on private vehicles. You can park anywhere in town virtually for free (save McCarran), communities are getting further and further away from the employment centers (Kyle Canyon/Coyote Springs/Inspirada), and we continue to add lane capacity to our roadways. Sadly, it’s not even our policymakers fault. Our own attitudes toward transit and dense residential development are to blame. Transit is a great option……. for “the other guy”. Densely developed homes are a step in the right direction (we think to ourselves while sitting in our spacious backyards).


    Report abuse

    Jon wrote on January 24, 2008 05:16 PM: The problem with monorails is that they are extremely expensive... even a high speed rail line would be sufficient-- at 130 mph, it's only 15 minutes or so.


    Report abuse

    kevin wrote on January 24, 2008 10:19 AM: assuming the high speed mag-lev train never gets built, the best solution is to extend the current monorail to mccarran as well as the ivanpah airport. we dont need more roads, we need more public transport.


    Report abuse

    ths wrote on January 24, 2008 07:25 AM: We should be looking at a monorail type high speed train from the airport to a terminal here in Vegas. No visitor will want to pay the $40+ cab ride to that airport, so lets make it convenient and fast by having a mass transportation terminal where they can get on a high speed monorail to that airport and beyond. The other direction let them get on the monorail to the strip. Bypass as much road traffic as possible should be our goal.


    Report abuse

    Vegas Vic wrote on January 24, 2008 04:08 AM: This is a project worth the money, unlike the Carson City "improvement" of a road that gets less traffic than any Las Vegas surface street during the day.