Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
Business


BUSINESS SURVEY: DIFFERENT TAKES ON TAXES

Two-thirds of those surveyed would oppose a tariff that would add to their operating costs







Sides are lining up in a looming battle over taxes, as public officials and business leaders consider how to plug a $500 million shortfall in the state's budget.

The Nevada State Education Association wants to raise the gaming tax 3 percentage points to finance public schools, while gaming companies say it's time for nongaming businesses to pay more, too.


Most Popular Stories
  • Buyout to take casino parent private
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • Chase makes takeover official
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • CityCenter licensing gets own hearing
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Vote paves way for LV-style casinos in Ohio
  • Holiday office parties take hit




  • A Las Vegas Review-Journal/Las Business Press survey of local businesspeople has found widely varying views on new taxes.

    Opinions were evenly split on increasing the gaming tax to finance education, with 51.6 percent of respondents giving the higher levy a thumbs up and 42.6 percent rejecting the idea. Nearly half -- 44.4 percent -- said they'd like to see proceeds from a bigger gaming tax go to other sectors besides education. Tops on their wish list were areas including transportation, infrastructure, Medicare, children's welfare programs and health care for the indigent.

    The online survey also asked business managers for their thoughts on a "broad-based" corporate income or receipts tax that some local gaming executives are promoting as an alternative to higher casino fees. About two-thirds of survey participants said they would not support broad-based business taxes that would add to their operating costs.

    Survey respondent John Gibson, chairman and chief executive officer of chemical maker American Pacific Corp., took issue with both higher gaming taxes and broader corporate levies.

    Gibson, who's on the board of the Nevada Taxpayers Association, took issue with using the referendum process to expand the gaming tax. Setting tax rates is the province of the state Legislature, Gibson said. Nor does he favor imposing additional burdens on an economic sector that employs a substantial portion of Nevada's work force.

    And new taxes on nongaming businesses could harm the low-tax reputation that has drawn relocating companies to Nevada from across the country, Gibson said.

    He called the gross receipts tax a failed proposal from the state's 2003 legislative session, "one of the most unfair taxes anyone has considered," because a business could lose money and still owe money under such a revenue scenario.

    "It's been wonderful to watch the incredible growth of Las Vegas," Gibson said. "I believe that growth is, in large part, due to how we tax businesses. This community has a very positive future so long as we don't tamper with the fundamental laws that make it all possible."

    Should fresh calls for a gross receipts tax or another broad-based levy emerge in the 2009 legislative session, Gibson expects the nongaming business community to "aggressively oppose it."

    Richard Olden, owner of car-wash business WashWorks, agreed that a broad, gross receipts-type tax on nongaming businesses would hurt the survival prospects of companies with small profit margins.

    "Most businesses don't earn anything approaching what the casinos earn," Olden said. "It's a disproportionate increase for small companies when you bump our taxes up 1 percent."

    Also, previous tax increases don't leave Olden with much confidence in future plans to raise revenue.

    The gross-payroll tax, the state business-license fee and other levies added in 2003 to relieve a $1 billion budget shortfall didn't disappear once Nevada's income and spending plans stabilized in 2004, 2005 and 2006, he noted.

    "It's easy enough to pass new taxes, but no one looks back and asks if we still need them," Olden said. "There's no sunset law. That's a peeve."

    Still, quality education is essential to building a world-class economy, Olden said, so he understands the need for additional school funding. And when Olden sees the gaming industry setting records for monthly revenue -- the sector posted an all-time single-month high of $1.164 billion in October -- he said it's easy to divine the best source for extra education dollars.

    What's more, gaming operators benefit from privileged licenses, said Perry Ursem, a business-development executive in the construction industry. That barrier to entry for competitors gives gamers an advantage that should be factored into any talk about taxes. The debate should also include talk about the potential harm higher taxes would do to smaller operations, Ursem said.

    "When you start to dip your hands into the pockets of the smaller businesses that are the foundation of this community, that can have an effect on the long-term stability of Nevada's business community," he said.

    Local business executives who advocated broad taxes didn't elaborate on their opinions by press time. But they said in their survey responses that the soundest path to fiscal stability lies with a tax base that includes as many companies and industries as possible.

    "There needs to be a more balanced approach," wrote Tony Sanchez, corporate senior vice president of Nevada Power Co. parent Sierra Pacific Resources. "Gaming can be looked at, but other sources of potential revenue need to be on the table."

    And John Moran, principal of Moran Financial Services, urged business executives in the nongaming sector to consider ponying up additional funds for important public services, rather than hitting up the gaming industry for yet another tax increase.

    "The educators are risking killing the goose that lays the golden eggs," Moran wrote in the survey. "The casino industry is a driving force in the Nevada economy. All other businesses should start to get involved on an equitable basis."

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or (702) 380-4512.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Paula O'Donnell wrote on January 27, 2008 04:26 PM: When we have a shortfall in budget, we decrease expenses. This applies to business as well as our personal budget. Our state needs some creative thinking on the part of educators. Schools could be used twelve months a year and for longer hours. Teachers need a nice clean classroom and textbooks. Let's put more time in classrooms and education, and less time in attempting to raise taxes.

    I am opposed to raising gaming taxes or broad based corporate taxes. Businesses already pay enough taxes and fees. Higher taxes will result in fewer jobs.


    Report abuse

    ths wrote on January 27, 2008 02:05 PM: It is interesting how we target the Casinos when the second biggest Nevada industry sneaks by with one of the lowest tax structures.

    MINING at record mineral prices on the open market they are making a huge amount of money and pay a lot less tax in the percentage side then the casinos.

    Why is no one targeting them? They can't go anywhere else as the minerals are here.


    Report abuse

    Vegas Vic wrote on January 27, 2008 12:32 PM: The MAIN problem with the article's discussion is increasing existing taxes or formulating new ones. What needs to happen is for local and state governmental offices to cut out the pork and learn to live on a strict budget. Joe Average Citizen can't give himself a raise when he feels he needs money but this is exactly what the legislature has done and is doing. What happened to all the revenue that the 2003 $833 million "Screw Nevadans" tax brought in? We, as taxpayers, need to call, write and email our elected representatives and let them know that we are NOT going to put up with more taxes on top of all the ones existing. If the state government can't survive on the current revenue stream then they need to cut the excesses.


    Report abuse

    Lee Yarbrough wrote on January 27, 2008 11:02 AM: helen weils,

    I would be interested in knowing why you would want to move your business from Nevada, the states that is one of the lowest in total tax burdens in the country, (#23) to Wyoming, who is the second highest tax burden per person in the country?

    We have owned businesses in Las Vegas for many years. We would not have a problem with a fair additional tax on our "net receipts" if the government would also be more accountable for their spending.

    We have looked at other states, small business have it great here, that is why we stay here. The red tape in this state is way over the top but the taxes are nothing to complain about.


    Report abuse

    douglas wrote on January 27, 2008 09:22 AM: if the illegal infiltrators were removed from the school, penal, health care systems, could be those budgets would be in surplus with the present rate of tax collection. instead of resolving the root of the problem, the leftists would further burden legal u.s. citizens.


    Report abuse

    Chris wrote on January 27, 2008 08:58 AM: One thing is for sure. We can count on the state legislature and the rest of the government to screw everything up. Rather than reduce the waste, we will increase taxes.

    Thanks, Helen. We get it; single-spaced, double-spaced and triple-spaced.


    Report abuse

    ANONYMOUS wrote on January 27, 2008 07:41 AM: Las Vegas is experiencing yet another building boom on the strip, which employees thousands of construction workers and will employ tens of thousands of resort employees. The casinos that build these mega-resorts have a stable and low gaming tax rate in mind. If the gaming tax is raised, expect scaled down new projects, layoffs and less opportunity for resort employees. Before comparing gaming tax rates from other states, take a look at the quality of their casinos. No other location has the quality of worldwide destination resorts like Nevada does. This can be pointed directly to our low gaming tax rate.


    Report abuse

    Vegas Vic wrote on January 27, 2008 06:13 AM: The MAIN problem with the article's discussion is increasing existing taxes or formulating new ones. What needs to happen is for local and state governmental offices to cut out the pork and learn to live on a strict budget. Joe Average Citizen can't give himself a raise when he feels he needs money but this is exactly what the legislature has done and is doing. What happened to all the revenue that the 2003 $833 million "Screw Nevadans" tax brought in? We, as taxpayers, need to call, write and email our elected representatives and let them know that we are NOT going to put up with more taxes on top of all the ones existing. If the state government can't survive on the current revenue stream then they need to cut the excesses.


    Report abuse

    helen weils wrote on January 27, 2008 05:51 AM: As a small business (internet) who makes 0% of my revenues from Nevada


    but instead brings revenues from all over the world into Nevada while paying


    the highest vehicle taxes, high sales


    taxes, and plenty of business fees,


    I would IMMEDIATELY take my business and become a Wyoming corporation. BYE


    BYE NEVADA!


    The casinos DESERVE a tax increase for


    all of their bs.


    Report abuse

    helen weils wrote on January 27, 2008 05:49 AM: As a small business (internet) who makes 0% of my revenues from Nevada

    but instead brings revenues from all over the world into Nevada while paying

    the highest vehicle taxes, high sales

    taxes, and plenty of business fees,

    I would IMMEDIATELY take my business and become a Wyoming corporation. BYE

    BYE NEVADA!

    The casinos DESERVE a tax increase for

    all of their bs.


    Read All Comments