Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Business

Wednesday
Mar 17, 2010
Mostly Clear
Mostly Clear 74° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

Business


Bill cites 43 billion reasons for oversight of Net gambling

WASHINGTON -- As bills trying to roll back an Internet gambling ban languish in Congress, another measure was introduced this week claiming that a tax on online gambling could produce up to $43 billion over 10 years.

Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., unveiled legislation Tuesday calling for federal regulation and taxation of Internet gambling.


Most Popular Stories
  1. 7-Eleven seeks sites for LV expansion
  2. Macau may take back land promised to casino operators
  3. New Yorker to take reins of Las Vegas chamber
  4. Rumjungle nightclub files for bankruptcy
  5. Nevada part of appliance rebate plan
  6. MGM closes private offering of debt
  7. NJ: Asian casino boss has mob ties in China
  8. Theater-going growing, movie executive says
  9. West lags rest in job recovery
  10. IN BRIEF




A spokesman for an Internet gambling advocacy group said the legislation would strengthen provisions in an earlier version proposed by McDermott in June.

"It is time for Congress to address this issue and put in place security controls to protect the millions of Americans that continue to gamble online despite the prohibition," said Jeffrey Sandman, a spokesman for the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative.

Taxes on Internet gambling could raise between $8.7 billion and $42.8 billion in a decade, according to an analysis by the accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers that McDermott released last month. But Frank Fahrenkopf, president of the American Gaming Association, questioned those numbers.

Fahrenkopf said many states are unlikely to authorize Internet gambling even if the federal ban is repealed.

McDermott spokesman Mike DeCesare said the tax revenue estimate was made so wide in an effort to be credible.

"I still think the odds are very long that a bill (to repeal the Internet gambling ban) will pass in this Congress," Fahrenkopf said.

Fahrenkopf said he is troubled by the prospect of federal regulation and federal taxation of the gaming industry.

"This is a matter for the states, not the federal government," Fahrenkopf said.

McDermott's original bill had only one co-sponsor -- Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii. The bill he offered Tuesday has no co-sponsors.

Three other bills to dilute the Internet gambling ban, which was enacted in the closing days of Congress in 2006, remain stalled.

McDermott's bill would supplement legislation introduced last April by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., that would require the Treasury Department to regulate the $15 billion Internet gambling industry.

About 23 million gamblers are wagering on about 2,500 Web sites.

"The Frank bill is the lead bill, and it must move first before Jim's legislation," DeCesare said.

So far, 46 members of the House have co-sponsored Frank's bill.

Frank, who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, conducted a hearing on Internet gambling in June, but nothing has happened since.

The Internet gambling bill with the most co-sponsors is a measure by Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., calling for a one-year study of Internet gambling by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. It has 68 co-sponsors.

The House Judiciary Committee conducted a hearing in November on Berkley's bill and another bill by Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., to exempt poker and other "games of skill" from the Internet gambling ban.

Wexler's bill has 21 co-sponsors.

The judiciary committee has not followed up on either bill.

Contact Stephens Washington Bureau reporter Tony Batt at tbatt@stephensmedia.com or (202) 783-1760.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

douglas wrote on March 06, 2008 08:35 PM: if internet gaming is permitted, then absolutely b&m casinos must similarly no longer prohibit any children from wagering.

as the lady spokesperson on the video professor commercials... "half the time my daughter knows more about the computer than i do. and she is only 3."

to permit that 3 year old to play on line yet to prohibit her from playing in a "live" poker game at a licensed casino is discrimination. and while the law makers are at it, if that child is permitted to drink alcoholic beverages at home, then she should also be served while playing in the casino.


Report abuse

McDermott wrote on March 06, 2008 03:49 PM: As a political office holder, I will uphold the integrity of Online Gambling by making access available to people of all ages to gamble.


Report abuse

Publius wrote on March 06, 2008 11:40 AM: The ONLY reason I can see maintianing the ban is just so "govmint" can't get it's grease-mitts on ANY proceeds, er,uhhhm, taxes.


Report abuse

Greg McFarlane wrote on March 06, 2008 07:41 AM: Thank you, Rep. McDermott, for saving me from myself. People, listen to your Washington overlords and do whatever they reccommend. They're smarter than you and me, and have our best interests at heart.