Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
Business


Bill seeks controls for coal plants

WASHINGTON -- Two House Democrats on Tuesday introduced a bill that would prevent approval of new coal-fired power plants until state-of-the-art pollution controls can be developed and installed.

The measure if passed would deal a blow to major coal plants that have been proposed in Nevada, as well as dozens of others across the country. At least 16 projects already have been canceled and three dozen delayed amid growing concerns about their greenhouse gas emissions and construction costs.


Most Popular Stories
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • REAL ESTATE: Short sales on the rise
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy




  • "My legislation says no new plants without emissions controls," said Rep. Henry Waxman of California, chairman of the House oversight committee that has held hearings on the government's response to global warming.

    The bill by Waxman and Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts would forbid the Environmental Protection Agency or states from issuing air permits for plants that lack "state-of-the-art controls" to capture carbon dioxide emissions, with such technology said to be years away.

    The moratorium would be in place at least until the government develops an emissions-control program. Congress is debating bills that would cap greenhouse gas emissions while allowing companies to buy and sell emissions "credits" depending on how their plants perform on pollution limits.

    Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., introduced a similar bill in the Senate last April.

    Three Nevada coal projects have been issued draft air permits by the state Division of Environmental Protection, and could have their final air permits in hand by year's end, said Charles Benjamin, director of the Nevada office of Western Resource Advocates, an environmental group that opposes the ventures.

    Project developers also are awaiting the completion of environmental impact studies from the Bureau of Land Management before they can start construction, he said.

    With the possibility that newly constructed plants would be grandfathered into a cap-and-trade program, the Waxman bill limits their participation for as long as they operate without carbon dioxide controls.

    "(The bill) sends a political signal to the industry as well as to the investment industry that going forward with these plants will be highly risky or at least increase the risk and costs," Benjamin said.

    But the bill is not realistic, said Frank Maisano, a spokesman for Sithe Global Power, which is planning a 750-megawatt coal-fired power plant near Mesquite.

    "To say we are not going to have any coal plants is pie-in-the-sky legislation," Maisano said.

    Similarly, spokesman Adam Grant for Sierra Pacific Resources, which is planning a 1,500 megawatt coal-driven power plant 20 miles north of Ely, said, "stopping production of the most abundant energy source is not the answer."

    A third company, LS Power, is developing a 1,600-megawatt coal power plant in White Pine County, 25 miles north of Ely.

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or (202) 783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Jerry Mac wrote on March 12, 2008 12:39 PM: Get the facts straight "ths". China is "kicking our a--" because they open one new coal power plant per week.


    renewable wrote on March 12, 2008 08:17 AM: big corporate mentality...run roughshod over the health concerns of the public, not to mention the specter of further global warming. They will pursue their short-term profits right to the extinction of mankind. Sad part is, there's gold in them there renewables too!


    ths wrote on March 12, 2008 07:19 AM: It is amazing how much these companies plan on spending to get permits, construction and then operating.

    If they took the same amount of money and went into renewable energy that does work think how far we would move forward. But instead this country thinks about quick returns and does not look long term. Wonder why China is kicking our a-- all over the place.