Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
Business


HOTEL ROOM TAX INITIATIVES: Ballot backers say lawsuit illegal

Challenge by municipalities headed to court

Proponents of two ballot initiatives that ask voters to reallocate hotel room tax dollars away from the Las Vegas Convention and Authority said municipalities challenging the proposals are violating Nevada law by doing so.

The School Funding Solutions Ballot Advocacy Group, which is headed by former state Treasurer Bob Seale, responded Wednesday afternoon to a lawsuit filed by the convention authority and every municipality in Clark County to stop the ballot questions.


Most Popular Stories
  • Mayor calls Lady Luck casino 'carcass'
  • CASINOS IN COURT: Testimony heard in Wynn case
  • Consolidated Resorts files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy
  • Players turned away at WSOP
  • Fontainebleau files motion to leave offices
  • Area economy hits 'pause' period, economist says
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Local gaming veteran sees opportunity in small Henderson casino
  • ONLINE GUY: Palm Pre promising but not ready to replace Apple iPhone in pocket
  • GAMING BEYOND NEVADA: Sands: Macau back in play
  • Las Vegas investor seeks approval of Riviera ownership stake




  • In a filing in Carson City District Court, Seale's group said Nevada law prohibits government entities from using taxpayer dollars to support or oppose a ballot question.

    The convention authority, joined by the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson, Boulder City, Mesquite and Clark County, filed a lawsuit in Carson City District Court to block the petition. The municipalities all have representatives on the convention authority's board.

    "Commencing a lawsuit to disseminate their position to the public or to prevent a question from being placed on the ballot in the first place does not fall under the limited exception provided for in (the statute)," said the filing. "As a result, the plaintiffs are violating the clear expenditure prohibition stated in the statute."

    District Judge Bill Maddox has scheduled a hearing on the lawsuit for April 18 at 10 a.m. in Carson City.

    Seale is circulating two petitions he filed with the secretary of state's office on Feb. 29 that he is hoping will qualify as initiatives for the November ballot. If approved, the initiatives would transfer room taxes from tourism support to help fund either public education or public safety improvements.

    Seale said the money would pay for needed improvements without raising taxes.

    Representatives from most of the major casino corporations have voiced opposition to the plan.

    Gaming leaders said they don't want to divert money used to market Las Vegas at a time when massive expansion is taking place on the Strip and a national economic downturn is curtailing U.S. tourism.

    Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman, who serves as chairman of the convention authority board, said he supported the lawsuit because the initiatives would divert hotel room tax dollars away from local governments as well as the tourism organization.

    The lawsuit claims the two initiatives would violate a 2005 state law that requires petitions to deal with a single subject. That argument was used recently by the Nevada Resort Association to prevent circulation of petitions calling for an increase in the state gaming tax.

    In the response, Seale's group said the initiative on education embraces one subject and matters germane only to that subject. The issue differs from the argument used by the resort association in its case against a proposed gaming tax increase.

    "The plaintiffs challenge the initiatives by twisting the plain language of the initiatives and their respective descriptions of effect to create a widely speculative array of arguments that are solely based on possible and unsubstantiated effects," according to the response.

    The lawsuit claims Seale is acting on behalf of the Las Vegas Sands Corp., whose executives have had a long-running feud with the convention authority and its operation of the Las Vegas Convention Center. Seale said he wanted to become involved in the petition drive after hearing the idea proposed in a speech by Las Vegas Sands President Bill Weidner.

    "Plaintiffs, falling back on their paranoid illusions of conspiracy against the LVCVA, believe the initiatives will only ever apply to the LVCVA and Clark County. This belief is simply wrong," the response said.

    During the 2007 legislative session, Las Vegas Sands executives, with the backing of Gov. Jim Gibbons, lobbied to have room taxes taken away from the convention authority and be used to fund transportation improvements.

    In the end, a compromise was reached in which the convention authority agreed to give up $20 million a year over the next 30 years to fund road improvements to Interstate 15 through the resort corridor.

    MGM Mirage, Station Casinos, Harrah's Entertainment, Wynn Resorts and Boyd Gaming Corp. have representatives on the convention authority's board.

    Room tax rates now average 9 percent in Clark County. According to the convention authority, room taxes collected in fiscal year 2007 were more than $397.7 million. Of that total, the convention authority used 47 percent of the total, or $191.9 million, while 53 percent, or $205.8 million, went into total community support, including $72.6 million that was distributed to the Southern Nevada municipalities.

    The convention authority has projected room taxes will reach $456.3 million in fiscal 2009 and $571.8 million by 2012.

    Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or (702) 477-3871.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    LVCVA MANAGMENT NEEDS TO GO wrote on April 04, 2008 03:52 PM: The LVCVA has close to a dozen vice presidents and countless directors. They do this to raise they're salary. VP's make more than directors and directors more than managers. This government authority is run by Rossi Rallenkotter. He has created a top heavy VP and middle managment system. Look at this new expansion (800-900 million). millions have been spent so far and look nothing yet. Look at the last expansion, the south hall. A large pole barn looking building that was over budget and out of time. These are most of the same people who market Las Vegas. Do you think they market Las vegas better than say Budwieser or Toyota market there products? The LVCVA is best example of corporate welfare in the valley. Leave the Convention Center the way it is but gut it of it's managment staff.


    ths wrote on April 04, 2008 07:36 AM: Anyone that says this makes sense does not understand the economics of Las Vegas. Las Vegas and most of the taxes collected would not be here if it was not for the tourism. We bring in billions of dollars a year in non gaming revenue thanks to the conventions.

    If it was not for the low cost of renting space at the LVCC and many other things conventions would go else where. Orlando spends millions a year on its convention center and there union labor rates are a fraction of ours and has easier right to work rules then here.

    The Mouse does not pay for the general Orlando advertising you see outside of the taxes they pay.

    Understand how tourism works and tourism authorities work around the country. They get tax dollars through things like room tax to bring people in to spend money. Often the revenue brought in is greater then the money spent.

    Also look the room taxes already are split and not everything goes to the tourist authority. A good amount goes to the local government.


    Helen Weils wrote on April 04, 2008 06:38 AM: This initiative makes sense. It's time
    the casinos started paying for their own advertising.