Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

sponsored by
Business


Harrah's opts to hail name of Caesars

Nearly three years after spending $9 billion to acquire rival casino operator Caesars Entertainment, Harrah's Entertainment is finally going to capitalize on the name.

Harrah's announced Wednesday that it plans to change the company's name to Caesars Entertainment Corp. The switch requires regulatory approval in the states where the company operates casinos.


Most Popular Stories
  • Mayor calls Lady Luck casino 'carcass'
  • CASINOS IN COURT: Testimony heard in Wynn case
  • Players turned away at WSOP
  • Area economy hits 'pause' period, economist says
  • Consolidated Resorts files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Local gaming veteran sees opportunity in small Henderson casino
  • Fontainebleau files motion to leave offices
  • FOURTH OF JULY TOURISM: Las Vegas is the place for bargain seekers
  • ONLINE GUY: Palm Pre promising but not ready to replace Apple iPhone in pocket
  • Job hunt is brutal for older workers




  • The name Harrah's, however, will not disappear. Harrah's will become one of the company's three primary casino brands, along with Caesars and Horseshoe.

    Harrah's has long been associated with middle-market gamblers and the company's Total Rewards marketing program, one of the gaming industry's pioneering database development systems. Harrah's was founded more than 70 years ago in Reno as a small bingo parlor by gaming figure Bill Harrah.

    In June 2005, Harrah's completed a buyout of Caesars, which at the time was the largest gaming industry merger and created the world's largest casino operator. The deal gave Harrah's the iconic Caesars Palace, one the Strip's most recognizable hotel-casinos.

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas public administration professor Bill Thompson, who specializes in gaming matters, said the name change should have been done when Harrah's bought Caesars.

    "Caesars is a high-class name with world reknown identity," Thompson said. "Harrah's is a good name, but it's middle-class. Harrah's is like Kmart. They should have done it when they merged."

    In a statement, Harrah's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Gary Loveman said the name change is designed to capitalize on the international name recognition of Caesars.

    "Adoption of the name Caesars Entertainment will provide our company with greater prestige and help attract strategic business partners as we pursue expansion opportunities in new jurisdictions," Loveman said.

    However, in recent weeks Harrah's announced it was withdrawing from potential hotel-casino projects in the Bahamas and Slovenia. Meanwhile, the company is adding the Caesars name to its Casino Windsor in Ontario in June. The name change is to coincide with a $400 million expansion.

    The Caesars name is on three Harrah's-owned casinos, in Las Vegas, Atlantic City and Indiana.

    Harrah's operates more than 50 casinos worldwide. The company employs more than 87,000 workers. In Las Vegas, Harrah's operates Caesars Palace, Bally's, Paris Las Vegas, Flamingo, Harrah's Las Vegas, Imperial Palace, Bill's Gamblin' Hall and the Rio.

    The name change will mark the second time Caesars has been adopted by a casino company. In 2004, Park Place Entertainment, which had acquired Caesars Palace, took on the name Caesars Entertainment.

    A Harrah's spokeswoman said it was unclear how long regulatory approval would take before the name change can be implemented. She did not have any estimates available for costs associated with the transition.

    Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3871.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    d. dalby wrote on April 11, 2008 11:00 PM: part of the reason for the name change is to distance themselves from the bad publicity of their many hotel violations. they are sneaky and sleazy!!!! offering 6/5 pay blackjack is a slap in the face to ignorant gambles who can't afford to gamble anyway.


    charles m wrote on April 10, 2008 01:59 PM: dear faf,if uve ever been out n the "breezeway" that seperates ballys from paris at its narrowist point the roads' wide enuff 2 accomodate cars goin n the opposite direction @ the same time.the distance on the other side between the neighboring planet hollywood,id says' roughy twice the distance.the properties could b split n 2 seperate entities,which they basically r already w/little challenge.the only common space they shares' the walkway between the 2 locals.


    Fafner wrote on April 10, 2008 10:45 AM: Charles, I'm afraid that would be a practical impossibility. Paris and Bally's share the same physical plant, which is why Paris occupies a relatively small "footprint" and was built for a relatively modest price.


    charles m wrote on April 10, 2008 10:28 AM: a memo circulated thru ballys and paris announced that they will no longer b sharing a gaming license.its rumored that the maloofs r interested n acquiring paris but not ballys hence the move.its also speculated that mgm would like 2 buy ballys.


    jm wrote on April 10, 2008 08:13 AM: Didn't Norm! print this in November or December of 2006???


    andsoitbegins wrote on April 10, 2008 03:10 AM: And so it begins, the slow dismantling of an empire. soon, properties such as Harrahs Laughlin, Reno, and other NONCORE assets as such will be sold off, and rightfully so.