Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
Business


Internet poker site operator doubts ban will be lifted anytime soon

WASHINGTON -- Although he supports congressional efforts to roll back the Internet gambling ban, the vice president of a poker Web site on Monday said he is skeptical that will happen in the near future.

"I don't want to be a naysayer, but things move very, very slowly in Congress," said Jay Lakin, vice president of Poker Source Online, which is headquartered near San Jose, Costa Rica.


Most Popular Stories
  • Buyout to take casino parent private
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • Chase makes takeover official
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • CityCenter licensing gets own hearing
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Vote paves way for LV-style casinos in Ohio
  • Holiday office parties take hit




  • Lakin said he is taking a "wait and see attitude" about a bill introduced last week by Reps. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Ron Paul, R-Texas, that would prevent the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve from proposing regulations to enforce the 2006 ban.

    As for legislation by Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., calling for a one-year study of Internet gambling, Lakin said he doesn't see the point.

    "It's nice of her to put it forward, but why should we spend more tax dollars to study something we already know the answer to? Internet gambling isn't going away, and it's going to continue to grow," Lakin said.

    The chances for a repeal, he said, may improve after the November elections. "I see a sea change coming," he said.

    Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., a sponsor of the ban, has said it is necessary to stop Internet gambling addiction.

    "In 2006 alone, nearly 10 percent of college students gambled online," Bachus said this month during a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee.

    In 2005, the year before the ban, about 2,500 Internet gambling Web sites produced about $15 billion in revenues.

    The impact of the ban has been "huge," Lakin said. His Web site, which does not take bets but advises gamblers where they can play online poker, suffered a 50 percent drop in business after President Bush signed the ban in October 2006.

    "That really motivated us. Now, we offer our services in seven different languages, and have more than recovered our losses," he said.

    Prior to the ban, about 95 percent of his Web site's customers lived in the United States, Lakin said. Now, less than 50 percent of the Web site's customers are American.

    Lakin said he is convinced a majority of Americans don't even know there is an Internet gambling ban and those who do are finding ways to get around it.

    For example, an American gambler can establish a bank account in a foreign country to pay to play poker online.

    Lakin estimated there are about 100,000 gamblers playing poker online at any given moment.

    "The bottom line is if poker players in the United States stick with the big boys in Internet poker (Web sites), they have nothing to worry about," he said.

    Despite his skepticism about congressional legislation, Lakin said he still wants the Internet gambling ban repealed.

    He said it is hypocritical for the ban to include exemptions for horse racing, state lotteries and fantasy sports but not poker.

    "That's like telling me I can go into a liquor store and buy vodka, but no gin," Lakin said. "I'm just disgusted by it."

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau reporter Tony Batt at tbatt@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 1 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    tbvegas wrote on April 15, 2008 10:41 AM: All the internet groups made a huge mistake 2 years ago when Harrah's was paying 7 figures to get the ban on. Obviously they understand internet gaming is the future and want it their way.
    The amount of money various net companies were making in 02-06 was staggering and if they would have gotten together and spend 10 million blocking the bill they wouldn't be in this position. Congress follows the dollars and they got caught not spending on the politicians. Harrahs etc will be the biggest internet gaming company. Period.