Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


Federal agency scrutinizing union's election tactics

SEIU accused of using employer cash to make election materials for candidates

The federal government's investigation into union-election practices has put one powerful local labor union on the defensive and given a competing union ammunition for its organizing efforts.

The U.S. Department of Labor is looking into allegations that the Service Employees International Union's Local 1107 in Las Vegas used employer money to produce campaign materials for a specific set of candidates in its September election of new officials.


Most Popular Stories
  • Mayor calls Lady Luck casino 'carcass'
  • CASINOS IN COURT: Testimony heard in Wynn case
  • Consolidated Resorts files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy
  • Players turned away at WSOP
  • Fontainebleau files motion to leave offices
  • Area economy hits 'pause' period, economist says
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Local gaming veteran sees opportunity in small Henderson casino
  • Boulder Dam Hotel forced to close doors
  • Mandarin adds swank to Strip
  • Las Vegas investor seeks approval of Riviera ownership stake




  • SEIU spokeswoman Hilary Haycock said the investigation began after candidates who lost their bids for offices within the union complained to federal officials.

    Deanne Amaden, a spokeswoman with the U.S. Department of Labor, said the agency's policy is to neither confirm nor deny ongoing investigations. She declined to comment further.

    Haycock said she wasn't certain when the department would issue its findings, but she noted the bureau extended its deadline for gathering evidence to May.

    Gregory Kamer, a partner in the labor law firm Kamer Zucker Abbott, said allegations of union use of employer dollars in elections is uncommon in Nevada.

    The charges are serious, he said, because the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 prohibits direct contributions from private-sector employers to unions.

    The law designates such violations as felonies, Kamer said, and penalties include up to $15,000 in fines or up to five years in prison, or both.

    The federal government's investigation into the SEIU has become fodder for the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee, which is tangling with the SEIU over representation of nurses at the three hospitals in the local St. Rose Dominican health-care system.

    The CNA issued a series of statements Tuesday blasting the SEIU over the department's investigation, calling the charges "the latest in a pattern of corruption and violence emanating from the top leadership" of the SEIU.

    "They're taking money from employees, the people they negotiate with, and using it to run a slate of candidates," said Fernando Losada, collective bargaining director of the National Nurses Organizing Committee and head of the effort to gather Southern Nevada members. "It's the worst type of conflict."

    The CNA began its current bid to represent local nurses in late 2007.

    That's when SEIU-covered nurses at St. Rose Dominican started talks for new contracts with the SEIU. Some of those nurses reached out to the CNA and asked for the opportunity to join, Losada said.

    The nurses are scheduled to vote on their union representation May 6 and 7.

    The CNA has already made strides with nurses at a St. Rose Dominican sister hospital in Northern Nevada.

    About 500 nurses at Reno's St. Mary's Hospital, which belongs to St. Rose Dominican parent Catholic Healthcare West, joined the CNA four months ago. The CNA also represents about 10,000 other nurses at Catholic Healthcare West hospitals across the region. CNA officials plan to meet with nurses at other local hospitals as well, after the May elections conclude, Losada said.

    Haycock said the CNA's take on the Labor Department's investigation shows the competing union's officials "clearly don't understand the investigation."

    "It's another example of the CNA using hyperbolic language, completely distorting the truth and really hurting the ability of workers both here and across the country to achieve the goals workers want to achieve, which is to improve working conditions, build the American dream and improve health care in Las Vegas," she said. "They're trying to organize nurses here, and they're willing to say or do anything to destroy the powerful union that Nevada's health-care workers and public-service workers have built."

    Haycock added that SEIU officials are "pretty confident" that the Department of Labor will certify the union's election was legal.

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Connie wrote on April 18, 2008 02:03 PM: Hillary Haycock? Are you kidding me? She's just the recently hired mouth-piece of MacAlevey. She has no idea what she's gotten herself into, pitiful as she is. In case people have not noticed, the Department of Labor already determined FOUR SUBSTANTIATED VIOLATIONS - FELONY VIOLATIONS.

    This attempt at glossing over the issue by talking about being found to be innocent is ludicrous. It's mis-direction, one of the things Stern and MacAlevey do best. We've been onto them for a couple of years. It's been tough fighting against a corporate union law firm, a corrupt Executive Director, and some corrupt board members. But what gets me most is the money they use for these corporate lawyers is my dues money! This so-called extension until May, who do you think is paying those lawyers' fees? The members are!! How crazy is that?

    The corrupt MacAlevey and her in-the-pocket board members "Unite To Win" slate need to be held accountable for what they have done. The Department of Justice needs to step in and criminally prosecute Stern, MacAlevey, the board members, Regan, the law firm. This corrupt MacAlevey and her in-the-pocket board members have voted to spend our money on frivolous ventures, (their own parties, etc).

    People have no idea what we have gone through to try to get these truths exposed - and we're still fighting the corrupt board members who are sticking with MacAlevey. Be very careful about how the MacAleveys and Sterns and in-the-pocket board members try to spin this. The truth is leaking out just a little at a time. Listen to the people who have been fighting to get this out. We're trying very hard to get our union back!!!


    Furious wrote on April 17, 2008 03:19 PM: Does it get any more corrupt than the SEIU? If they're not roughing up nurses they're using employer money to fund their campaigns. The SEIU isn't a union. It's a shakedown organization bought and paid for by the companies that hire them to keep real unions from taking root.


    Ted wrote on April 17, 2008 07:39 AM: A "pattern of corruption and violence emanating from the top leadership" of a union. Who would have ever thought that would be possible? (sic)