Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Business


Sands exec: Family link reason for Suen's role

Las Vegas Sands Corp. President Bill Weidner said Wednesday that he didn't like working with Hong Kong businessman Richard Suen and would have stopped trying to negotiate a deal with him if Suen didn't have a business relationship with company Chairman Sheldon Adelson's brother.

"You really didn't like dealing with Mr. Suen, did you?" Sands attorney Rusty Hardin asked Weidner during his third day on the witness stand in Suen's lawsuit against the company.

"No. I was disturbed about the representations he was making," Weidner said during testimony in Clark County District Court.

However, Weidner continued to try to strike an agreement with Suen, who was attempting to help the casino operator bid for a Macau gaming license, because he was brought to the company by Leonard Adelson, the chairman's brother. Suen and Leonard Adelson were business partners.


Most Popular Stories
  • VANISHING AT WARP SPEED
  • Video maker sued by LV hotel
  • INSIDE GAMING: Adelson journey proves fruitless
  • Wynn sues NBA for unpaid use of convention space
  • Gambling stocks tumble on economic woes
  • DOWNTOWN LV: Land-value raise may lift Lady Luck
  • WORKPLACE STUDY: WORKING WONDERS
  • North LV retail center a shell of what it will be
  • RENEWABLE ENERGY: Sunny days for Las Vegas
  • Negreanu shines beyond table



  • "Sheldon would ask, 'What are you doing with Richard?' " Weidner said.

    On the stand, Weidner said if not for the relationship with Adelson's brother, "He wouldn't have had anything to do with Richard. I wouldn't have bothered with him."

    Weidner, the No. 2 person in Las Vegas Sands hierarchy, testified he ended up having to handle negotiations with Suen because Sheldon Adelson, suffering severe pain from a rare neurological disorder, was often incapacitated by pain medication during 2001.

    Weidner said that some days, Adelson wasn't in the office because of pain. Other days, when the pain medication took effect, "he was the same old Sheldon." He said Adelson seemed to recover when his wife, Dr. Miriam Adelson, who treats drug addiction patients, placed him on methadone.

    Suen believes his efforts helped Las Vegas Sands secure a lucrative gaming concession in 2002. He's asking a jury to award him millions of dollars from the company, which operates two gambling resorts in Macau and is building a dozen more hotel-casinos on the Cotai Strip.

    As he did in earlier testimony, Weidner downplayed Suen's assistance, saying he didn't believe Suen's efforts helped the company. Despite more than 20 faxes and letters exchanged between Las Vegas Sands and Suen, no agreement was ever reached, Weidner said. However, he thought Suen should be compensated for his time and expenses.

    Weidner spent most of the day under the questioning of Hardin rehashing his testimony from the previous two days. Today, Suen's attorney's are expected to provide taped deposition testimony from former Las Vegas Sands general counsel David Friedman.

    Suen is also expected to testify.

    Weidner told jurors all of the things that Suen said Las Vegas Sands needed to accomplish in order to obtain a gaming license turned out to be inaccurate.

    "We didn't do any of what he recommended," Weidner said.

    During morning testimony about Weidner and Adelson's meeting with Chinese government officials in July 2001, Weidner was shown a photograph taken after the meeting. He couldn't identify a Chinese business development official.

    "All Chinese look alike," Weidner said, quickly adding, "They think we all look alike."

    Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3871.



    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    kschong wrote on May 26, 2008 11:52 AM: Just curious, without written agreement to pay Richard Suen a service fee, how did he manage to win the suit, after all it is one's words against another, right? Please advise


    LegalEagle wrote on April 24, 2008 06:27 PM: Aaahhhh... good old racism... alive and well in our fair city. Sure wish I could have been there to see Adelson's lawyers faces when Weidner made that comment. The Chinese community can take heart in the fact that although Weidner can't tell any of them apart, he still appreciates their business - here in Las Vegas and now in Macau, to the tune of Billions.


    AngryChinese wrote on April 24, 2008 11:33 AM: That last statement he made says it all. If the Sands 'old white men' are that out of touch with what is and isn't a stupid racial remark, there is no way they could have won that contract without Suen. Unbelievable!


    AngryChinaman wrote on April 24, 2008 11:29 AM: Bah wha wha what did he say!?!??!?!

    If this 2nd in command to old man Adelson is that 'sensitive' to Chinese negotiations, there is no doubt in my mind that without Suen the Sands would have NEVER had a chance.

    Unbeleivable, I hope that stupid remark was read into the court record.


    Daniel wrote on April 24, 2008 07:21 AM: Wow was that a Racial remark at the end?