Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
Business


Senators renew try to revise mining law; Reid may be key

WASHINGTON -- A bipartisan group of 10 senators is trying to jump-start stalled efforts in Congress to update the 19th century law that governs hard-rock mining, the second leading industry in Nevada.

In a letter this week to Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., the chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the senators called for a "fair and equitable" tax, or royalty, on mining revenues.


Most Popular Stories
  • CASINOS IN COURT: Testimony heard in Wynn case
  • Boulder Dam Hotel forced to close doors
  • Consolidated Resorts files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy
  • Players turned away at WSOP
  • Fontainebleau files motion to leave offices
  • Area economy hits 'pause' period, economist says
  • Lake Las Vegas residents keep confidence despite bankruptcy
  • Mandarin adds swank to Strip
  • REAL ESTATE: U.S. foreclosures down 11 percent but Clark County numbers defy trend
  • Las Vegas investor seeks approval of Riviera ownership stake




  • "For 136 years, under the 1872 (Mining Act), valuable minerals mined on federal lands have been given to private interests for free. By comparison, other extractive industries -- oil, gas, coal -- pay a royalty when operating on public lands," the senators wrote.

    The letter was signed by Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis.; John Sununu, R-N.H.; Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.; Judd Gregg, R-N.H.; Jack Reed, D-R.I.; Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I.; Bob Menendez, D-N.J.; Olympia Snowe, R-Maine; Ben Cardin, D-Md., and Bernard Sanders, an Independent from Vermont.

    Last November, the House voted 244-166 for a bill calling for an 8 percent royalty on the gross income of new hard-rock mines on federal land and a 4 percent royalty on mines already operating on federal property.

    All three of Nevada's representatives in the House voted against the bill, and Sens. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and John Ensign, R-Nev., both declared the House bill "dead" in the Senate.

    The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee has conducted two hearings on mining reform since last September, but a Senate version of the mining reform bill has not yet been introduced.

    Bill Wicker, a committee spokesman, acknowledged progress has been slow.

    "A great deal of high-level staff time has gone into drafting legislation, and we're continuing to work on it every day," Wicker said. "We're also aware that the election year calendar is not an ally."

    It is unlikely mining reform will go anywhere in the Senate without the nod of Reid, the Senate majority leader.

    "If we are able to pass mining law reform, it's going to have to be a package that provides a fair return to taxpayers and that gives miners and mining communities the certainty they need and deserve," Reid spokesman Jon Summers said.

    Ensign said he would support "reasonable" reform that would not cripple the mining industry.

    "We are already suffering at the gas pump today by allowing ourselves to become too reliant on foreign sources of oil," Ensign said. "Are we really prepared to make the same mistake with our domestic mining industry?"

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau reporter Tony Batt at tbatt@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    DJ wrote on April 25, 2008 08:00 PM: David Johann, Do a google search "Dirty Harry Reid" Then come back to the board.


    David Johann wrote on April 25, 2008 07:33 AM: Speaking like an AM radio nut who occasionally gets some supplementary information from The Fox "News" Channel and the R-J editorial page:

    Oh boy! Another article about Harry Reid! (Who cares about the actual content of the article--the information contained therein) here's our chance, ONCE AGAIN!

    Yeah! We get to post a bunch of ad hominem one liners with no real information about how evil Mr. Reid is! Woo-hoo!

    (Well, that's the way it's usually been here in recent months).


    Reid is generally the key wrote on April 25, 2008 06:55 AM: Reid needs to go


    Check it out wrote on April 25, 2008 06:54 AM: Construction gravel pits are considered mines.





    Now figure it out from there.


    Check it out wrote on April 25, 2008 06:53 AM: Construction gravel pits are considered mines.



    Now figure it out from there.


    Check it out wrote on April 25, 2008 06:53 AM: Construction gravel pits are considered mines.

    Now figure it out from there.