Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


Tumbling home prices seen

Money magazine ranks Las Vegas No. 5 for projected value losses

A national finance magazine predicts more big price drops in the Las Vegas housing market, and that devaluation could mean more pain for the local economy, experts say.

Money magazine, in its May 7 issue, placed Las Vegas near the top of its list of markets poised for declines in housing prices in the next 12 months.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle




  • The magazine ranked Las Vegas No. 5 in the country for projected value losses through May 2009, with an expected drop of 18.3 percent. That would send the local median home price of $277,000 down to a circa-2003 rate of around $225,000.

    Locals shouldn't expect prices to bottom out until sometime between January and March 2010, the magazine added.

    Markets in for worse times include Miami; Fort Lauderdale, Fla.; and Orlando, Fla., Money said. Phoenix tied with Las Vegas in anticipated depreciation. The nation as a whole should see price falloffs of 9.7 percent, the report said.

    An 18.3 percent drop in home prices could further stall a local economy already posting slower consumer spending, with Clark County's taxable sales off 3.1 percent in February when compared with the same month a year earlier.

    Every 1 percent in lost single-family home values prunes $800 million in wealth from Southern Nevada's households, according to Las Vegas research firm Applied Analysis. Include condominiums and townhomes, and locals' assets drop nearly $1 billion for every 1 percent slide in prices.

    Devaluation shakes up consumers and discourages spending, and it also peels away the equity that finances home remodeling, trading up to a bigger place and even big-ticket purchases such as cars and vacations. Banks are already responding to the possibility of sustained depreciation: Countrywide Financial Corp. announced on May 6 that it had suspended home equity lines of credit for almost all of its Las Vegas customers.

    "I don't want to understate the importance of mobility within the economy," said Jeremy Aguero, an Applied Analysis principal. "The reality is, a lot of people are either upside down on their homes or locked in, so people are waiting for the economy to be in a better position. Falling prices have a liquidity effect, as well as a real effect, on consumers."

    But Aguero and other observers say Money's prognosis might be too negative.

    They didn't completely dismiss the possibility of an 18.3 percent pricing drop. After all, few local economists expected prices to plummet more than 20 percent in one year, as they did from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2008, according to the National Association of Realtors.

    Because prices depreciated so much in 2007, though, the slide in prices should slow in the next year, they said.

    "The last time we saw prices in that ($225,000) realm was in mid- to late 2003, so Money's numbers assume we're going to basically wipe out the last five years of appreciation," said Ken Perlman, vice president of Sullivan Group Real Estate Advisors. "It assumes no upward momentum in the marketplace at all over a five-year period. To me, intuitively, that sounds a little aggressive."

    Prices will probably continue to soften in the coming year, Perlman said, but several factors point away from the significant dip Money's researchers augur.

    First, the market is showing improved sales activity, according to data from the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors. Sales of homes sold through the trade group's members rose in April for the fourth month in a row, evidence that consumer appetite for buying property has improved, Perlman said. Inventories have stabilized as well, sitting between 22,000 and 23,000 homes listed for the last few months. And the weak U.S. dollar is piquing interest among foreign investors who now enjoy improved buying power stateside, Perlman added.

    Perlman also noted that any discussion of depreciation needs to distinguish between lower prices and lower values. As builders erect more condominiums, townhomes and small, single-family homes to meet consumer demand for lower-maintenance lifestyles and more-affordable prices, median prices will fall, Perlman said. But that doesn't mean overall values -- what homes are worth -- have declined. To get at true value trends, consider prices per square foot, which are holding at $100 to $125 per square foot.

    Money's editors, who used statistics from e-commerce provider Fiserv and mortgage-technology developer CoreLogic, didn't return calls seeking comment on their study's methodology by press time. Nonetheless, one local analyst took issue with the publication's unified look at the valley's housing future.

    The new-home and resale markets are distinct animals, and they could each face different fortunes in the next 18 months, said Dennis Smith, president of local analysis firm Home Builders Research.

    Home builders have pared new-home inventory to about 800 units marketwide -- around a two-month supply at current absorption rates. With so little supply, new-home prices shouldn't shed 18.3 percent of their value, Smith said. Builders would simply halt construction before they would sell homes for so much less, he added.

    Cloudier prospects beset the existing-home sector, on the other hand, mostly because of the large number of bank-owned properties and homes in foreclosure. About 7,000 local listings -- nearly one-third of the market -- are foreclosure properties.

    "Lenders have all these properties, and we're not sure how long they'll hold those properties, or whether they might try to dump them all on the market at the same time," Smith said. "Most bankers say they won't do that, that they're not in business to lose money. But (bank-owned) properties are key to this market. We're in the hands of the lenders."

    It's conceivable that existing single-family homes, which posted a median price of around $236,000 in April, according to the Realtors association, could drop to that Money estimate of around $225,000 in the next year, Smith said, but that wouldn't constitute the 18.3 percent drop the magazine's editors expect.

    Analysts were mixed on whether the market would bottom out in early 2010.

    Smith said he didn't expect substantial upticks in activity among new-home sales in 2009, so that market segment could stay sluggish through early 2010. And Perlman said planning to be "in the midst of a full rebound in 2009 might be a little premature."

    But Aguero said Money's prediction of a 2010 turnaround is a year or so behind what his research indicates.

    "By early 2010, we'll already have had the opening of CityCenter, requiring 12,500 new employees, and we'll be within 12 months of the opening of Echelon, with another 12,000 employees. Our expectation is to see a bottoming-out by the end of 2008."

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.

    MONEY'S MONEY LOSERS

    Money magazine placed Las Vegas among its top markets for housing decline in the next year:
    City Median
    price
    Expected price
    change
    through 2009
    Miami $329,000 -24.9%
    Fort Lauderdale, Fla. $309,000 -22.2%
    Orlando, Fla. $245,000 -21%
    Phoenix $237,000 -18.3%
    Las Vegas $277,000 -18.3%
    West Palm Beach, Fla. $305,000 -17.6%
    Tampa, Fla. $200,000 -17.1%
    Riverside, Calif. $340,000 -16.9%
    Tucson, Ariz. $217,000 -16.9%
    Stockton, Calif. $341,000 -16.8%
    Source: Money Magazine
     
    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 37 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    vespa wrote on May 19, 2008 10:41 AM: north las vegas is not a ghetto. alliante is very nice, the closer you get to 215 the better. and if we ever get the district at desert star (planned outdoor mall at craig and north 5th) and the mall planned at losee and 215 area, and if they ever turn craig ranch into the regional park as they have been talking about for years, there will be even more incentive to live here. there are places in north vegas that are pretty bad, but not the new north vegas. you don't have to drive thru tons of industrial to get to alliante. and even if you did who cares? there are some pretty nice homes in this area that are foreclosures, really good deals to be had. believe it. we just need more commercial. there is alot planned , it's just a matter of if and when it happens.


    noVaseline wrote on May 17, 2008 10:49 AM: Las Vegas prices in many areas are the same as Orange County, so I do not think many Californians are going to be flocking to the heat, a weekend is fine under these circumstances. Banks are writing down the loans on their books and will dump houses in the coming months. Expect areas such as Summerlin to drop 15 to 20% in the coming year if they want to sell the house...out


    What!! - NLV wrote on May 16, 2008 08:15 PM: NLV is nice? Are you kidding me?

    It is the GHETTO. You got all the bros gang banging, doing drugs, stealing from the uneducated white folk who can't afford to live anywhere else.

    I guess when Obama gets elected in Nov he will give these losers a group hug and all will be well in Northtown


    Bvsuds wrote on May 16, 2008 07:31 PM: Hi all again,
    No disrespect to the NLV crowd, but seriously. Aliante I'm sure is nice, but let's get real here. When Yucca Mountain officially becomes America's atomic shit pond, you'll be first to catch the whiff of the mushroom cloud. Not to mention, you gotta drive through a ton of industrial to even get up there. Then the first thing you get is the stench of the pig farm. Don't even get me going on the commute. Really folks, it's not a place to live unless you work at Nellis. And now the industrial projects up in the Speedway area are not doing that great. One of them I saw on a foreclosure listing recently too. Maybe buying a home as an investment, if you can really fleece the bank, but nothing to live in. And as far as Californians moving here and screwing up the prices, I stand by it. There will always be a sucker willing to overpay for a home in Las Vegas, and chances are pretty good that it'll be a Californian. I can thank them now, I have two props. Hated'em when I was looking for homes though.
    Good luck to all.
    It's a blood bath out there!
    PS:
    I think Flow is onto something with that 75k price. I like the humor. Sorry we don't see eye to eye on NLV. Peace
    b


    Flow Here wrote on May 16, 2008 06:17 PM: Flow back here again. Just so you all know my earlier post was pure hyperbole. I tried to be over the top, but it is sad that people thought I was serious, and it is even more sad that people agreed with me.

    Listen, now is the time to buy. I can't see the future, but I predict that by 2010, prices will be appreciating, and by 2012, prices will be higher than they were in 2004.

    And to the person ripping on NLV, you are an idiot. Places in Aliante and El Dorado are nice, just as nice as Henderson. Those places aren't "North Town" just like Green Valley isn't old Henderson. Ask any old timer in Vegas whether Henderson was a nice place to live back in the day.


    Genius wrote on May 16, 2008 05:18 PM: First, it was completely IMMORAL for the government to use our money to bail out the greedy bankers and mortagae houses. IMMORAL! Next, this article is completely wrong. Las Vegas housing market is moving back up, NOW. Hang onto your hats, because you're about to get a huge windfall in equity, then will be the time to sell.


    rb wrote on May 16, 2008 03:38 PM: Well let me get this straight. the lenders control this market by owning all or most of the homes now. The lenders control the money and decide who to lend it too. Well, looks like fascism is alive and well here in sin city. www.zeitgeistmovie.com


    Furious wrote on May 16, 2008 03:33 PM: First of all, this article isn't about Obama, so get over it. Second, Bvsuds's argument is about two years old. Californians aren't swarming to Las Vegas to scoop up homes and they're certainly not staring at half million dollar starter homes. Prices in California, like Nevada, are in a free fall. Year-to-year home prices in March fell 29 percent in California and repossessions are skyrocketing. 1,000 homes a day are being auctioned in California. Are you telling me the folks being thrown from their homes are coming here to buy? Bvsuds is right about one thing. No one knows when the bottom will be in. But with Money Magazine predicting an 18% drop in Las Vegas home prices during the next 12 months, I sure wouldn't be buying now.


    LOL Meney trees wrote on May 16, 2008 02:44 PM: Obama will not change the culture of blacks who are accustomed to receiving a welfare check and tax payer funded medical care. If anything Obama will cause racism to soar. Most likely more freebies for the too lazy to work crowd higher taxes on working people to support the welfare mama's.

    Think about this, whites rule Africa not blacks ruling a Black Nation. Why do you suppose that is?


    Obamanation wrote on May 16, 2008 02:29 PM: Money Trees grow in Fantasy Land (USA):

    Presidential Election Cycle:

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a new U.S. president, and then after the first year, the market improves until the next presidential election. Has proven true since 1900.

    Bad Wall Street = poor consumer confidence, since people will feel "poorer" = less spending = lower prices.

    PS Money: I'm not for Obama, I actually like Ron Paul.


    Read All Comments