Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
Business


MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: Health care deal gets challenge

Union chief protests 'unbridled market power'

CARSON CITY -- A big union, national, state and local medical groups, a local government official and a U.S. House panel filed documents Thursday in Washington, D.C., in efforts to block the biggest health care deal in Nevada history.

The documents filed with the federal Justice Department and U.S. District Court oppose the $2.6 billion purchase of Las Vegas-based Sierra Health Services by Minnesota-based UnitedHealth Group.


Most Popular Stories
  • Mayor calls Lady Luck casino 'carcass'
  • CASINOS IN COURT: Testimony heard in Wynn case
  • Consolidated Resorts files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy
  • Players turned away at WSOP
  • Fontainebleau files motion to leave offices
  • Area economy hits 'pause' period, economist says
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Local gaming veteran sees opportunity in small Henderson casino
  • ONLINE GUY: Palm Pre promising but not ready to replace Apple iPhone in pocket
  • GAMING BEYOND NEVADA: Sands: Macau back in play
  • Las Vegas investor seeks approval of Riviera ownership stake




  • Those opposing the deal include Service Employees International Union Nevada, which represents thousands of health care workers in Nevada, the American Medical Association, Nevada State Medical Association and Clark County Medical Association.

    Also fighting the acquisition are Clark County Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani and the U.S. House Committee on Small Business.

    The Justice Department already has said it will allow UnitedHealth to go forward with the purchase, but only if the companies divest assets related to UnitedHealth's Las Vegas Medicare Advantage.

    Officials for the two companies promised to comply with the required divestiture as well as the Nevada attorney general's demand that United Health contribute million of dollars to charities in the state to demonstrate it would be "a good corporate citizen."

    But Jane McAlevey, head of SEIU Nevada, said the deal still leaves "hundreds of thousands of Las Vegas consumers vulnerable to UnitedHealth's unbridled market power; and Giunchigliani said UnitedHealth has a "horrific track record of business practices that are bad for patients and bad for providers."

    The physician organizations said the deal would enable UnitedHealth to acquire a 90 percent share of the health maintenance organization market, and the Justice Department "dropped the ball" in letting the acquisition proceed.

    The House Committee on Small Business contends that a combined United-Sierra would have an overwhelming market share and that could lead to reduced compensation for health care providers. The panel also said the result could be reduced access to health care.

    Ken Burdick, CEO of UnitedHealth, has said the combined companies will offer Nevadans "affordable, high-quality health care" and "the most comprehensive range of cost-effective, innovative health care products and services in the Southwest."

    Burdick and Jonathon Bunker, president and COO of Sierra, said they also would make $15 million in charitable contributions over the next five years to benefit health care consumers and programs in Nevada.

    The acquisition was approved by Nevada's insurance commissioner after representatives of the two companies said Sierra Health would retain its own leadership and expand services without raising rates.

    Going into the deal, Sierra Health had more than 300,000 members in employer-sponsored plans in Nevada and another 320,000 people in plans for retirees and government workers.

    UnitedHealth Group, the largest health insurer in the United States, is headquartered in Minnetonka, Minn. In 2007, United reported revenues of approximately $75 billion.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 1 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Richard L. wrote on May 16, 2008 06:34 AM: While the proposed Medicare HMO part of the plan appeared to solve part of the non-competition threat, elements of already proceeding implementation of the merger are of concern. Visiting nurses are quitting in droves, the telephone system at Sierra has been revised and is a huge disaster (just try to get through to someone,) programs have been truncated and other concerns for patients have appeared. Sierra was well run and patient friendly when it operated independently, but now elements of the pending merger appear to threaten chaos in the quality of resulting care.