Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Business

Saturday
Mar 20, 2010
Clear
Clear 60° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Business


TOURISM: If not by air, then how?

Fewer flights to Las Vegas may mean fewer tourists and pain for resorts

Cuts to the number of flights to Las Vegas could outlast the nation's current economic dip, making it more costly and inconvenient to get to one of the world's top tourist destinations long after the next recovery.

With record-high fuel prices forecast by some to go even higher, airlines potentially face an industry-changing dynamic that threatens an important commodity for the Las Vegas economy -- cheap and easy flights to and from Southern Nevada.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Trump project will cut smaller checks
  2. Tax status hurts attracting out-of-state business, Gibbons warns
  3. Sandra Bullock still poised for successful future
  4. In Brief
  5. Titus, Berkley say they will vote for House bill; 'public is demanding this,' says Titus
  6. Nevada businesses support clean-energy measure
  7. Demi Moore's Twitter account part of suicide help
  8. Start the Madness



If that happens, it would be up to the hospitality industry to find ways to keep casinos on Las Vegas Boulevard and Fremont Street bustling despite transportation costs eating a larger portion of tourists' budgets.

"It wouldn't surprise me to see a lot more capacity drawbacks in Vegas over the next year," said Darryl Jenkins, former director of the George Washington University Aviation Institute. "This isn't an economic cycle. This is a cost increase. It is the worst one any of us have ever seen."

Already, five airlines with service to Las Vegas have filed for bankruptcy or ceased to operate since December.

Another, US Airways, recently announced it would reduce the number of flights to and from Las Vegas nearly 20 percent come August.

American Airlines also announced it would cut some flights after the peak summer season is over although it did not announce which routes would be affected.

Even Southwest Airlines, an industry leader that remains profitable and the carrier that hauls the most Las Vegas passengers, has reined in growth plans in large part due to escalating fuel costs.

"It is not surprising because most airlines are in a lot of distress right now," said Andrew Levy, chief financial officer for Las Vegas-based Allegiant Air. "They really struggle to make money flying into pure leisure destinations like Las Vegas."

Unlike most domestic airlines, Allegiant is growing revenue and continues to post double-digit profit margins. The airline saves money by flying low-cost MD-80 aircraft from small-town markets with little or no competition and by packaging seats with hotel rooms, rental cars and even Las Vegas show tickets.

Levy said cuts by other airlines could benefit Allegiant because in tough times troubled carriers tend to withdraw from the kind of small markets that are Allegiant's specialty.

But unless carriers adopt new business practices to account for higher fuel costs the fallout could be tough on Las Vegas, said Levy, whose background includes a stint as vice president of an investment company that specialized in aviation.

He called recent service cuts, "a fraction of what it will end up being if fuel prices stay where they are, or go higher.

"It is going to dramatically change the way we travel in the U.S.," Levy said.

Others warn against reading too much into the airline cutbacks.

Traffic at McCarran International Airport has dipped in recent months, but remains strong. And with an estimated 30,000 new hotel rooms under development on the Strip there is an expectation more tourists will come to gape at multi billion dollar resort projects such as Encore and City Center.

"We never get too overly excited about one carrier's reduction," said Randall Walker, director of aviation for Clark County, of the looming US Airways cutbacks.

In 2002, when the tourism business was still suffering fallout from the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Las Vegas absorbed the complete and sudden shutdown of National Airlines.

In 2001, National was the fifth-most prolific airline at McCarran and represented about 7 percent of total airline passenger traffic at the airport.

"One day they just stopped flying," Walker said. "It took about three months before we didn't notice the difference."

Walker said US Airways cutbacks may turn out to be a positive for Las Vegas if they free up space at crowded McCarran for new flights.

That's because many of the routes US Airways will trim are connecting flights, meaning aircraft stopped in Las Vegas en route to another location containing passengers who didn't stick around long enough to leave their money.

According to Walker, 51 percent of passengers on the soon-to-be defunct routes were connectors even though just about 15 percent of McCarran's overall passenger traffic is people making connections.

"We are really not too fond of those kind of flights," Walker said. "We try to manage this airport for the benefit of the community."

A reduction in the number of flights could reduce revenue for the airport, which makes money from landing fees and other charges through the airlines as well as from retail and food and beverage sales in the terminals.

Although Walker said the revenue comes in on a per-passenger basis, so the airport would still make money if people who would have used the US Airways routes arrive via a different carrier.

The airport also bases fees on operating costs, which means if there are fewer flights it could increase what it charges airlines to maintain a steady revenue stream.

The economic slowdown isn't changing plans for a new airport to complement McCarran, either.

Walker said plans are on track to open the proposed airport about 25 miles southwest of McCarran in 2017.

He said down cycles in the economy in the 1980s, '90s and early 2000s didn't do much to disrupt the long-term traffic increases at McCarran.

Jeremy Aguero, a principal for the financial consultancy Applied Analysis, said he thinks Las Vegas will endure the airline slump.

Aguero acknowledged Las Vegas will lose customers "at the margins" due to the economic slump and airline industry woes. However, he said the greater long-term problem will be finding ways to accommodate more visitors. New hotel rooms will bring new guests and Interstate 15 from California to Las Vegas is already congested.

McCarran could also reach capacity before a new airport is built.

"The math is very difficult to get through in terms of how you get enough people into Southern Nevada," Aguero said. "I don't think we have fully exhausted the well of demand for Las Vegas."

Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3861.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 26 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Paco wrote on June 26, 2008 02:07 AM: A few people have mentioned rail (regular old fashioned rail). It is not an option anymore. In the 10 years that Amtrak stopped service the existing rails are completely full of freight trains.
- The options are (1) Desert Xpress for $3B, 125 mph to Victorville, with no intermediate stops or (2) Maglev for $12B, 180-200 mph to Anaheim with several intermediate stops.


Report abuse

Bigdaddyj wrote on June 16, 2008 08:15 PM: Can't they just fly fewer flights with bigger planes? 20 years ago when I used to fly from the East Coast to Vegas, the planes were always 747's or DC-10's...now they're always tiny little narrow-body 767's or Airbuses...you'd think the airlines would understand "economies of scale"...seems to me air travel was better when they flew more wide-body jets...but I could be wrong...


Report abuse

JD wrote on June 14, 2008 08:49 AM: I love it when people who do not like something and also like something start to bibker.
I love Vegas. BUT I refuse to pay $600 for a flight from Toronto, Canada and then pay over $100 a night for accomodations plus add the phone fee etc. In April my flight was $350, now $550-$600 when I last looked. I will probably go once a year or once every other year and find somewhere to take a trip to that is not so expensive.
Besides Vegas wants the people who have money visiting nowadays. This is why moderate priced places are slowly being levelled for more upscale expensive resorts.
Las Vegas is transitioning into a place for those who are the well to do. Your middle class people are less and less being accepted there because we do not blow $1000's. Greed is what has set in with the corporations. It will change in another 10-20 years.
And Vegas will start to look more at the foreign travellers than domestic. Even though about a million Canadians trek to Vegas last year, I think we are grouped in with Americans when it comes to visitors to Vegas. We only have 2 airlines and they follow what the American airlines do. So the extra fees are added onto us as well.
Vegas will change its strategy and start looking to overseas vistors. But for them it is not the fuel costs that discourage them, it is the long waits at Immigration/Customs that discourages them.
I love Vegas but if i am to pay another $200 for my flight, that means $200 less to spend there. But for those with money? That is pocket change. Who would you prefer to be coming to town?


Report abuse

mr. bush wrote on May 28, 2008 01:19 AM: lol where do you get your facts? Hawaii
the number one tourist destination? NO. Orlando has beaches and rich history? NO. It has Disney World. Depending on how you define "tourist", the top four cities in America are LA, New York, Vegas and Orlando. Honolulu isn't even in the top ten. If your talking about overnight visitors, Vegas sold 40 million hotel rooms last year. No other city comes close. There's no point in making things up when you can just Google it. Also MGM hasn't delayed anything. Ever heard of City Center? Lastly, every city in America is highly auto dependent except Manhattan.

And BTW, I live in Southern California by the beach, not in Vegas. But I love Vegas, it's one of a kind. I can tell when people are bashing it just because it makes them feel better about their boring ass cities.



Report abuse

charles wrote on May 27, 2008 10:57 PM: Hillarious Mr. Bush !! You and James must be friends or roommates. A city that depends solely on air transportation and the automobile is about as backasswards as it gets. Vegas is by far not a world destination, that would be Monaco or the French Riviera. But you probably have never set foot out of Clark County, so no danger of you ever setting foot over there. And get your facts right. The number one tourist destination is still Hawaii, with Orlando Florida closing in closely. As both cities offer beaches, theatres, museums and have a rich history, families have far more to do than in Vegas. And no one enjoys tumbling up and down the strip from casino to casino in August when it is 105 plus outdoors either. And as others have said, Vegas no longer has a lock on gambling. Other states have it, and more will after election day too. And since only two foreign carriers fly in to McCarran nowadays, how do you think others will get here with less flights?? Flap there arms because it is Vegas ?? I highly doubt that. We are all glad that in yours and James' world everything is aokay. When the prairie dust settles and you both wake up, you might see a very different Vegas in the near future. MGM has already delayed most of its projects because of the economic downturn, and other will follow. And with OSHA cracking down on most of the casino companies as well, the fast one two three construction days are long over. American Airlines already announced its cutbacks today, and some Vegas flights are effected. And they said more will follow. So the days of gamblers just tumbling off airplanes seems to be over. And as for rail, good luck!!!


Report abuse

george w bush wrote on May 27, 2008 08:50 PM: All you haters hoping Vegas will fail are amusing but very ignorant. None of you understand Las Vegas or have any sense of history. Vegas is a world destination, with nothing else like it on Earth. People don't come here just to gamble, they come here for the experience. The problem is not Vegas, it's how to get people here with rising fuel costs. Until we get off our oil addiction, Vegas will be hurting, but so will every other city. In the end we will come out stronger than ever. But first we need to make the difficult transition off oil.

And Deanna, all Strip projects will be completed, no question. But how do we fill them up? Should MGM, Harrahs, etc. build another multi billion dollar hotel? Or should they start thinking about investing in infrastructure? I think a maglev to Cali would be a great start.


Report abuse

Deanna wrote on May 27, 2008 07:44 PM: Wow, James has serious issues. Has his welfare or food stamps runout, or did someone break into his trailer ??? This fool must obviously ride a bicycle or live amongst the cactus, since no one can be that removed from reality and not see the downturn in the US economy. And we have not hit bottome yet either. Just look at all the empty houses in Summerlin and Mountains Edge, and it surely reminds you that Vegas is built on ego and big dreams. Well folks the bubble just burst, airlines are cutting back, and gas is $4.00 a gallon, and other states across the US now offer what Vegas once had a lock on...gambling. The people back east no longer have to come here, as both Jersey and Pennsylvania both now have legalized gambling. And considering the hotels in both states don't rake you over the coals with roomrates and hidden extras, the geniuses that run our casinos better wake up and smell the coffee. You can only fleece the public for so long, and get away with it. It will be a miracle if some of the strip projects ever get completed...Mark my words..But James would love that..Extra places to pitch his tent or park his pickup with camper attached...


Report abuse

0u812 wrote on May 27, 2008 03:45 PM: Calm down everyone i & my wife are coming back this year. There is more to Las Vegas than gambling and shows.
This is where we fly into and then rent a car and drive to Mesquite. You have history out there learn from it, think about it. We are nothing but Pussy's, look at what people 150 years ago had to do, to get out to Nevada. They walked, rode on wagons pulled by horses, oxen's, rode horses, donkeys and some survived, some did not but Las Vegas was born. Every state was born this way. GREED will always win until WE THE PEOPLE stop it by not buying GREEDS services, but saving his/her money. Oil will rise even more because oil knows that we will buy. Until we shut down there offices we will keep on bickering and they don't care.


Report abuse

chris wrote on May 27, 2008 01:53 PM: I really feel sorry for morons like James, who obviously think gasoline is still $1.00 per gallon, and rooms on the strip can be had for under $100.00 per night. Las Vegas is pure luxury and not a necessity to anyone, other than the owners of the casino/hotels. If this fool would get his head out of the desert sand long enough, he would realize that this city has no transportation system in place and depends solely on the automobile and car. Steve is so right, but one could also say that Clark County needs to start whooing other industry to ease the pain and level the eonomy. The first thing that goes in a sour economy is trips to dump money in slots at Vegas casinos. But more importantly lots of folks no longer have to travel here since gambling has been legalized in more and more states across the U.S. What was once a Vegas exclusive, can now be had everywhere, and with better paying slots and less expense to stay for a few days. So Vegas better come up with another idea if it wants to remain competetive in the tourism city. Hawaii is still a better bargain overall, and family oriented as well. Vegas goes after the bored adult that has no kids...


Report abuse

Dan wrote on May 27, 2008 01:23 PM: "As fuel price rise, eventually we will switch from luxuries to basic needs. Las Vegas is not a basic need. Las Vegas is one of the most energy dependent cities in the U.S. The Mexi's should feel right at home."

Well, lower-case racist bill, since the country wants to put its nuclear dump in our backyard, maybe we'll just power up a few European-style reactors (read: safer) and keep the neon bright so that those who look beyond the ignorant simplicity of "gasoline prices" and still have money can come enjoy themselves here. The rest of you, have fun wherever you may end up.

I love using energy because I love living like a modern human being. There isn't a soul alive in the United States that isn't taking up too much space (proverbial or otherwise) so get of Vegas' back, will ya?


Read All Comments