Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Business


Solar-power lobby's pressure has Ensign feeling alienated

WASHINGTON -- Breaking with an industry that is growing significant in Nevada, Sen. John Ensign cried foul this week against a solar power lobbying campaign.

Ensign said an effort to pressure him on solar tax breaks has had the opposite effect of "personally alienating" him and other senators.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • Harrah's Entertainment plans to lay off more workers
  • Casinos must wait for $800,000
  • $475 MILLION FOR SANDS: Loan fails to impress investors
  • PLAZA VERSUS PLAZA
  • Macau's drop-off hurting Las Vegas
  • INSIDE GAMING: Forty days, 40 nights and a cry of protest
  • Vegas atop home-price record drop
  • Greenspun Media Group lays off up to 10 percent of staff
  • FAA: Planes can't fly these crowded skies
  • MORTGAGE MELTDOWN: Report: Bailout tally high



  • In an outburst notable for its bluntness, the Republican sent a blistering letter Thursday to the national membership of the Solar Energy Industry Association, and later gave it to reporters.

    He said lobbyists threw away their goodwill when they carried out a strategy that included a statement suggesting Ensign was favoring "billionaire hedge fund managers" over job creation in Nevada.

    "It is rare to have such overwhelming bipartisan support in today's political climate but the solar industry had it and your association's leadership squandered it," Ensign wrote.

    The episode exposed a fissure that had been widening since last year as Congress tries but fails to extend investment and production tax credits for solar, wind, geothermal and other renewable sources that expire this year.

    Nevada solar executives privately expressed unhappiness that Ensign was voting against bills containing the tax credits along with other expiring tax breaks.

    Ensign said he opposed the bills because they would have paid for the new tax breaks by raising taxes on the oil and gas industry and other business interests. He argued the trade-off would blunt the overall benefit to the economy.

    Earlier this spring, Ensign sponsored an alternative with Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., that called for new renewable energy tax breaks without cost offsets. It passed the Senate 88-8, but is stuck in the House.

    On Tuesday, the latest effort to move a tax bill was blocked by Republicans 50-44. A new vote is expected next week.

    In advance of Tuesday's vote, the solar industry said in a statement that Ensign "will have to choose between job-creating solar power for Nevada or continuing a veto threat that protects the off-shore tax havens of billionaire hedge-fund managers."

    That set off Ensign, along with disclosure of a solar lobbying plan targeting Republicans, including Sens. John McCain and Jon Kyl of Arizona, Pete Domenici of New Mexico, Orrin Hatch and Robert Bennett of Utah and Wayne Allard of Colorado.

    "Following a partisan playbook is not a proven or wise track," Ensign said in his letter to the solar industry. "Instead of capitalizing on this opportunity to achieve your goals, SEIA wasted it."

    Rhone Resch, Solar Energy Industry Association president, said Friday the intent was not to alienate Ensign but to prod Congress to find a way to pass the tax provisions. If they expire, investment in solar will come to a halt, he said.

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@ stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.



    Leave Your Comment 18 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Mitch wrote on June 15, 2008 12:56 AM: I want to have have higher taxes on dirty energy sources such as coal and oil, so that renewable and cleaner sources can be developed. Lets face it, the majority of Americans are too selfish to spend more for cleaner energy. And you can't blame many of them, either. Its easier in the short run to put food on the table using dirty energy. However, this won't last long because its non-renewable and we all want a piece of the cheap stuff...

    Development of renewable energy sources is inevitable if lucky humans in the developed world plan on maintaing a comfortable existance.

    We should be capitalizing on this necessary measure so that Nevada Power will stop paying companies to literally blow up the Appalachian mountains, poisoning local drinking water supplies and killing people just so we can have a lower power bill...


    For the dogs wrote on June 15, 2008 12:29 AM: Ensign needs to go back to being a doggie doc.


    Tom wrote on June 15, 2008 12:27 AM: Why would Nevadans support a Washington person like Cantwell? Who are these people?


    Eric wrote on June 15, 2008 12:25 AM: Nice to see Nevadans that donate to Cantwell


    Max wrote on June 15, 2008 12:24 AM: Ensign and co sure do team up and support Maria Cantwell.


    Clean Coal Nevada wrote on June 14, 2008 11:50 PM: coal is the answer , use it or lose it.

    let's see solar run your AC.


    Ugly American wrote on June 14, 2008 10:19 PM: Coal? Why not bring up whale oil while you're at it?



    US anthracite (high grade coal) production peaked in the 1920s and the sharp production contraction was a contributing factor the the US Great Depression. The cost of energy skyrocketed which made everything from ships and trains to raw steel shoot up in price.



    That's one of the reasons the US moved to oil in the first place.



    Then US oil production peaked in the early 70s and was followed by skyrocketing prices and unemployment.



    The low grade crap that's left has less and less net energy per ton and requires more and more work to get to.



    The price of high grade coal has more than doubled in the past 2 years and shows no signs of stopping. Only limits on utility rate increases have kept the full price from showing yet, but it will.


    Solar Idiot wrote on June 14, 2008 09:14 PM: Hey, Mr. Sunshine:

    Can I please have all of my tax money back that went to fund, and all of my money that has yet to fund, the Bush / Cheney War exactly half-way around the globe (actually, a veiled attempt by the oily boys to secure the remaining region of comparatively cheap oil under U.S. control).

    That was a lying, expensive, Bush / Cheney debacle (the worst president in history).

    So much cheaper to fund solar research.


    Mr. Sun wrote on June 14, 2008 04:21 PM: Hey solar idiots --- put your OWN MONEY where your mouths are and build these great masses of solar panels on YOUR DIME!

    All talk and NO action... I thought so.


    Solar is the Way to Go wrote on June 14, 2008 02:59 PM: The Solar Solution

    1- Go to Walmart and buy a bunch of those solar lawn lights when they are on sale,
    2- Put a few of them in series to boost the voltage,
    3- Run wires from the light bulb to your circuit box,
    4- Disconnect from the grid,
    5- Turn on your A/C,
    6- Run around in your `birthday suit' and visualize a cool day on the beach


    Read All Comments