Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
Business


Experts air solar grievances at hearing

 

Pick your poison when it comes to producing energy.

Many environmentalists oppose nuclear reactors and coal-fired power plants. Others fear even large-scale solar power projects, a popular source of renewable energy, will damage the environment.


Most Popular Stories
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • REAL ESTATE: Short sales on the rise
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Airport suffers another decline




  • Concentrating solar thermal power plants, which focus the heat of the sun to boil liquids and spin generators, can consume large quantities of water and use vast areas of previously untouched wild areas, participants told the Bureau of Land Management at a hearing Wednesday night at the Clarion hotel in Las Vegas.

    Some solar thermal plants, which use wet cooling, consume the same quantity of water as wet-cooled coal-fired plants, although water consumption can be cut by 90 percent with dry-cooling technology.

    Government experts also said solar thermal plants typically need five acres for every megawatt of electricity produced.

    John Hiatt, a representative of the Audubon Society, said he supported solar energy but worries developers will clear a large area only to abandon the project, permanently damaging the environment.

    Other forms of renewable energy also have drawn criticism. Some complain that wind turbines kill birds although critics argue that domesticated cats kill far more birds than turbines. Geothermal power, which is derived from hot underground water, can cause hydrogen sulfide pollution, according to the California Air Resources Board. Many environmentalists believe it's more important to reduce carbon dioxide gas from coal-fired power plants and thus slow global warming than to preserve every tract of public land, said Charles Benjamin, director of the Nevada office of Western Resource Advocates.

    Others want public lands kept pristine and undeveloped.

    "In the area of renewable energy and energy generally, there is no free lunch, just like in life," Benjamin said Thursday.

    The BLM is expected to deal with issues like those in rules it is preparing to govern how and where it leases federal land in six states, including Nevada, to solar power developers.

    Solar power developers complained that the BLM has stopped taking applications for solar power plant leases while it writes those rules over the next 22 months. Officials said they already have received and will continue to process 130 applications for leasing land for solar power plants.

    "Freezing the industry will effectively stunt the industry and effectively destroy the industry before it gets off the ground," said Sean Kiernan of Ausra, the California company that is building a solar power component assembly plant in Las Vegas.

    Terry Page, a representative of Acciona Energy, which operates the Nevada Solar One thermal plant at Boulder City, and Rachel Gold of Solar Millennium, a California solar developer, also opposed the freeze.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he objected to the freeze and will look for ways to accelerate the processing of solar plant lease applications.

    Joni Eastley, chairwoman of the Nye County Board of Commissioners, said the county is excited about solar development but urged BLM to plan solar development carefully with "responsible stewardship of renewable resources."

    Assemblyman Ed Goedhart, R-Amargosa Valley, expressed no reservations: "I'm 100 percent for this renewable energy, particularly when it comes to solar. If we can't make it work in Nevada, there's truly something wrong with America."

    Goedhart said the country should set and exceed goals for renewable energy, showing the kind of determination that led to man's landing on the moon.

    "Show people around the world that we can still make something happen," he said.

    Contact reporter John G. Edwards at jedwards@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0420.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Gasolar wrote on June 22, 2008 06:50 PM: America wake up. Solar Energy Revolution NOW. Or you'll face a dark remaining 21st century.
    Nuclear will be most Expensive in the long run ... CSP will beat coal by 2020 !!!!


    Cheslea wrote on June 22, 2008 03:55 PM: Solar energy article, RJ


    Ugly American wrote on June 21, 2008 10:33 PM: We're supposed to believe that the same BLM that supports strip-mining, clear-cutting, new coal power plants and says it's OK to dump nuclear waste tailings on the surface - can't approve new solar projects because they care about the environment?

    Is anybody dumb enough to buy that?


    truth@aol.com wrote on June 21, 2008 10:30 AM: The enviros that oppose big solar plants in "pristine" areas are not able to see the forest through the trees. A utility scale solar thermal plant will leave a much smaller imprint on the land when its gone then a coal or nuclear plant. Transmission line will be built and it is up to us as responsible inhabitants on our planet to ensure that those lines are filled with clean energy, not old, dirty energy.

    I guess some people would prefer that we sit in the dark, but I know a lot of people that will compromise for the near term and sacrifice their own selfish wants to ensure a sustainable future for our children and grandchildren.


    rt wrote on June 21, 2008 07:46 AM:
    It`s not enviro-wackos, it`s big oil dressed as enviro-wackos!A big smoke screen!Change the system as to who gets big oil leases and remove the profits from foreign oil brought into this country by big oil companies and see how quick things would change.
    Arab-American oil is about money for nothing and tax evasion while the whole time they protect their nest egg leases via the so called enviro-wackos. Not all Americans are stupid but most are naive and look stupid.


    br wrote on June 21, 2008 07:11 AM: Enviro-wackos do not want any kind of energy production. They spouted the wonders of wind and solar technology until businesses started building them. Now they are blocking progress on everything to maintain a "pristine" enviroment. It is really their profession to protest, not produce.