Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Business


Professor urges legalizing Web betting

Rules seen curbing games' negative effect

Normally, the most vociferous calls for legalizing Internet gaming come from the growing online poker-playing community, offshore gambling site operators, civil libertarians and a handful of select members of Congress.

Add UNLV associate professor Kathryn LaTour to the chorus.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • EASTSIDE CANNERY OPENING: A timely premiere?
  • INSIDE GAMING: Herbst Gaming exploring all options
  • Black Gaming posts $20.3 million loss for quarter
  • Meridian said to have run illegal hotel
  • RETAIL: Dillard's at Boulevard to close
  • Airline slashes winter flights
  • Trevi Architectural will close
  • REAL ESTATE: Existing-home sales up
  • Staff, property ready for Eastside Cannery's opening night
  • Recurring currency



  • LaTour, who teaches in the William F. Harrah College of Hotel Administration, has co-authored a study that says the legalization and regulation of online gambling in the United States and Canada could help reduce some of the activity's harm. Gambling addiction, she said, could be curtailed while regulation would keep underage gamblers out of the virtual casinos.

    "It should be regulated," LaTour said. "When you get deeper into it, it's a battlefield. The integration of online gambling in the home can more easily turn gambling behavior into a component of a consumer's everyday life, like watching television."

    The report, "Blackjack in the Kitchen: Understanding Online Versus Casino Gambling," will be published in February in the Journal of Consumer Research. LaTour said it is the first time the publication has included a study about gambling. She co-authored the report with June Cotte, a marketing professor at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario.

    She was also quick to point out the study was funded by the hotel school, not the gaming industry.

    LaTour said that despite the negative elements associated with Internet gambling, she is not opposed to the activity as long as some limits can be set.

    The industry is estimated to be generating annual revenues upward of $10 billion to $12 billion, so its elimination seems remote. Online gambling is illegal in the United States. Canadian citizens can gamble online through provincial lottery corporations. North American consumers, however, easily engage in online wagering through Internet companies located offshore.

    Both researchers thought regulating the industry could lead to a form of taxation. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., offered a bill earlier this month that would legalize and tax Internet gaming. The legislation was opposed by Nevada's congressional delegation.

    "There are a lot of tax dollars out there that could be collected," LaTour said.

    The UNLV associate professor is not a gambler, but said she logged onto different gambling sites to see how they operate. She came across underage gamblers and what she believed to be compulsive gamblers. Chat rooms on the Web sites had graphic conversations and could be used for stalking, she said.

    "The legalization of online gambling allows for better regulation, including efforts designed to reduce the number of problem gamblers," LaTour said.

    The two researchers interviewed 20 regular casino gamblers and 10 regular online gamblers. The results of the study show that online gamblers wager more frequently and more aggressively. While casino gambling requires travel outside the home and often involves interaction with casino personnel and other gamblers, online gambling can be accomplished wherever the home computer is located.

    "Online gamblers are much more prone to suffer from all the negative aspects," LaTour said. "The activity lacks social interaction, which can increase the risk of addiction."

    Regulation, the report suggests, could make better use of age checks; cross-check users with lists of pathological gamblers; set wagering and financial limits; make information available about problem gambling and include the availability of an online counselor; set mandatory periods for gamblers to stop wagering; and make win-loss tabulations more central. Both researchers are opposed to flashing, bright graphics that signal winning bets.

    In addition to McDermott's proposal, Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., has called for a one-year study of Internet gambling by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., has proposed legislation that would overturn a ban on Internet gambling and require the Treasury Department to regulate online betting.

    The American Gaming Association, which represents the casino industry in Washington, D.C., and is neutral on Internet gambling, has supported Berkley's bill.

    Holly Thomsen, a spokeswoman for the association, said the gaming group is seeking a federally funded study to evaluate the effects of online gambling. The organization's board wants to know if Internet gambling can be effectively legalized and regulated in the United States.

    "Such an endeavor could evaluate whether legalization, regulation and taxation, on a state-option basis, may be a more viable option than a complete ban on Internet gambling, and would result in recommendations to Congress on the best way to handle the issue," Thomsen said in an e-mailed statement.

    LaTour said Nevada, where gamblers can wager most anywhere, including grocery stores, convenience stores and bars, has its share of online gamblers. She would like to see the state collect taxes from the activity.

    Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3871.



    Leave Your Comment 9 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Jack wrote on July 23, 2008 11:17 PM: Anyone else here have a problem with taking advice from an "educator" in Nevada?


    Genius wrote on July 23, 2008 06:59 PM: NO kiddin? a real live "perfessor"? Gee, if this is what UNLV is wasting its time on, no wonder the 'versity is ranked in the 4th tier nationally. I don't give a damn what people do in their own homes. If they're stupid enough to gamble away their money, then so be it. There should be no social services for this kind of stupidity. The perfessor would be better off pushing a State Lotto, so at least the money might go to something useful.


    Its Ridiculous wrote on July 23, 2008 01:54 PM: Anybody notice that they interviewed "20 casino gamblers and 10 online gamblers" for their study. That's a nice big sample size to insure accuracy! I think I'll ask my friends opinions and publish a report on it.


    hilobomacaine wrote on July 23, 2008 12:19 PM: it seems bottom line is the tax money they could get,instead of a state lottery why not bring back the electric chair and have mgm's book set a over/under on the convulsions of those executed if they had exclusive rights to it they would go for it


    FF wrote on July 23, 2008 11:53 AM: As it stands, all of the online casinos are located overseas and every penny that they get out of the US goes out of the country. Why not let our gaming operators compete in that market and keep some of that money here at home.


    Kevin wrote on July 23, 2008 10:11 AM: Why don't we start a state lottery. The revenues generated for education would be tremendous. Instead of letting all of those funds leave the state and go to Rosie's Den let the money stay here and generate funds for necessary educational programs. Oh...I forgot...stupid me,,,the Casinos don't want our students educated. With luvgov around and how he has his interest wrapped around the Strip boys we will never get education funded. I guess being hundreds of teachers short around here is acceptable. Nevada should change their theme...we love our people stupid that way we don't have to pay them.


    Gil Notoriana wrote on July 23, 2008 09:44 AM: Imagine, a mother holding her baby in one hand, playing 21, with the other hand, result: where's the rent money??


    Sick wrote on July 23, 2008 09:32 AM: IMO anyone that has the absolute need to gamble so much that they resort to online casinos has issues that need to be addressed. Gambling for the sake of gambling is just plain sick.

    There is no way online gambling can be effectively regulated without government censorship. Think about it.


    aaron wrote on July 23, 2008 08:40 AM: Just let MGMMirageHarrahsWynnStations buy Pokerstars already. We all know it's coming.
    Maybe then we won't have to worry about more Absolute and Ultimate Bet type crooks.