Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


NEVADA ECONOMY: State loses 10,700 jobs to China

Economists defend overall formation of work

As August's Summer Olympics open in Beijing, America's top athletes aren't the only homegrown product headed to China. A new study found that some of America's -- and Nevada's -- best jobs have decamped to the People's Republic as well.

The Silver State lost 10,700 jobs to China from 2001 to 2007, according to an analysis from the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C. The losses, which account for actual jobs shed as well as positions that went unformed, include more than 1,650 posts in food services and hotels. Also gone: blue-collar manufacturing jobs; manufacturing support services such as transportation; science and engineering jobs related to manufacturing; and advanced technology jobs, said Scott Paul, executive director of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, which commissioned the study.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License backed for Aria
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle




  • The nation lost 2.3 million jobs to China in the same period, the report said.

    Local economists respond that the number of Nevada jobs shipped to China pales in comparison to overall job formation here. Nevada businesses added 240,500 positions from 2001 to 2007, according to numbers from the state's Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation. That includes 34,400 jobs in hotels and 6,900 positions in manufacturing. Nevada has clocked in as the only state with any recent manufacturing growth, said Ray Bacon, executive director of the Nevada Manufacturers Association.

    Bacon said he couldn't think offhand of Nevada manufacturers that sent jobs directly to China. He cited a maker of foams for flower bouquets that shuttered its Dayton operation about seven years ago and moved to South Korea, where its market was expanding. He also pointed to a Sparks manufacturer of ear-protection muffs that consolidated operations in its Michigan plant after less-expensive Chinese earmuffs took over the U.S. marketplace. Both companies had 20 or 30 workers, Bacon said, and they paid anywhere from $12 to more than $15 an hour at the time they closed.

    "Our losses have been relatively minor, and most of the time they've been situations where the jobs in Nevada wouldn't have moved except for the fact that the main product they were supplying moved," Bacon said. "Instead of the jobs directly moving to China, the marketplace moved to China."

    As for the 1,650 jobs the EPI said Nevada dropped in food service and hotels, state economist Bill Anderson said a variety of factors make it difficult to pinpoint whether direct competition from China forced the losses. Some big casinos, such as the 1,800-employee Stardust, have closed in recent years, but they're making way for even bigger developments. The 10,000- employee Echelon is scheduled to replace the Stardust in 2010.

    "It's not like a hotel will close and shift its operations from the Las Vegas Strip to China," said Anderson, chief economist at the employment department.

    But job numbers are only part of the problem, Paul said.

    Nationally, among workers whose jobs went to China, 31 percent had four-year college degrees, and more than 50 percent landed in the upper half of the country's wage structure, he said. Their replacement jobs pay, on average, $8,146 less annually. That cost the American economy $19.4 billion in 2007. Lower salaries also suppress pay gains across the board, and they mean lower tax revenue for state and local governments, Paul added.

    Bacon agreed that the report's findings reflect turbulence in American industry.

    He estimated that as many as 80 percent of his group's members aren't hiring right now. And any study that points to weakness in U.S. manufacturing should raise alarms.

    "The sectors of the U.S. economy that truly add value are the sectors that produce something, whether it's goods, minerals that come out of the earth or food products," Bacon said. "Those sectors are mining, agriculture and manufacturing. When those sectors are weak, we're in trouble, and those sectors are all weak."

    Trade with China has its positive side, Bacon said.

    Nevada manufacturers that buy cheaper goods and commodities from China can reduce their costs and retain more workers, he said.

    What's more, Silver State companies enjoyed jumps in business from contracts overseas. Statistics from the Nevada Commission on Economic Development show a 10 percent increase in Nevada exports in the most recent quarter when compared with a year earlier. Shipments of industrial equipment rose 70 percent. Nevada companies including diving-board makers, language phrase-book publishers and landscape architects landed contracts related to the 2008 Summer Olympics that begin in Beijing on Aug. 8.

    Nevada got off easy in the EPI's analysis when compared with most other states. Two-thirds of jobs lost nationwide were in manufacturing, Paul said, and the Silver State's relatively small manufacturing base -- industry is just 4 percent of the state's economy -- protected it from the bigger drops that visited factory-heavy states.

    Nevada lost about 1 percent of the state's 2001 job base. Idaho topped the list of states in share of jobs that went to China, with 2.59 percent, or 14,700 positions, gone overseas. California ranked No. 5, with 2.23 percent, or 325,800 jobs, shipped to China. Hawaii sent the lowest percentage of its jobs to China, losing 0.74 percent, or 4,100 positions.

    "In a sense, we're somewhat sheltered relative to the impacts of job outsourcing," Anderson said. "Our manufacturing sector has held up relatively well."

    It would hold up better if U.S. policymakers encouraged China to uphold the agreements it struck when it joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, Paul said. That means urging the Chinese to eliminate subsidies for the country's manufacturers, asking them to stop fixing the value of their currencies and demanding that they enforce laws protecting intellectual property.

    "We really need a little more pressure on China to make sure it's honoring the commitments it made to gain greater access to our market," Paul said.

    Economic pressures could also restore American jobs transferred overseas.

    High fuel prices have made it uneconomical to continue sending some manufacturing work to China, Bacon said. Printing jobs and furniture-making in particular are poised to return stateside, he said. Plus, wages in China annually jump anywhere from 15 percent for assembly-line workers to 200 percent for managers, and those increases could make China less of a bargain in the long run, Bacon said.

    "We will be competitive again with the Chinese in 20 years," Bacon said. "It's just going to be hell for that 20 years."

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 25 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Grizz wrote on August 04, 2008 10:09 PM: The WTO must go why can a communist China subsidize business but we can't and keep losing jobs? The global economy is helping everyone but working Americans


    ralph wrote on July 31, 2008 06:55 PM: Roger. None of us like over paid execs.. it's baloney. However, you are completely incorrect in your statement. All of the corporate execs in the country could work for free and it wouldn't mean anything. In the overall scheme of things it's irrelevant. You can whine about it, but it's incorrect to think it's a significant factor. It's not. Corporate execs, who make too much I agree, would make the same decisions. Just do the math. It's not even a drop in the bucket. The reason they move is they have to stay competitive with world costs and world competitors. The shareholders, which I would bet you are directly or indirectly one of (got a pension) demand a return.


    Genius wrote on July 31, 2008 06:33 PM: Who is the nit-wit coming up with these "statistics". They're ridiculous. As Samuel Clemmens once said, "... there are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics!"

    General Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964 was right... better to have gone into China and just liberated the place once and for all, while we had the opportunity. A militaristic communist country like China is a major threat now, and they keep spending on their military like there is no tomorrow. Why?


    ralph wrote on July 31, 2008 06:21 PM: Randy you are completely out to lunch. It's people like you who need an education in economics. Corporate execs do NOT export jobs just to line their pockets. They do whatever the can to remain competitive and earn a return for their shareholders. ALL corporate execs in the nation could work for FREE and it wouldn't make a damn bit of difference. It's complete stupidity to think otherwise. Ya, the execs take all the money home instead of investing it where they can make the best return. You are completely wrong and anyone with a calculator can disprove your crap. So get an education. You are wrong. Flat wrong and anyone can prove it. I'm not a fan of overpaid execs.. but that is NOT the problem.


    ralph wrote on July 31, 2008 06:14 PM: China has a long term plan. We do not. China has a homogenous population all working together. We do not. China is patient. We are not. China doesn't oversped. We do. China doesn't have exorbitant taxes. We do. They are tirelessly working on a one hundred year plan while we have been getting fatter than little pigs worrying about Britney Spears. Do you think they are going to be a "waterbuffalo" powered nation forever? Anyone who pooh pahs China has their head in the sand.


    J wrote on July 31, 2008 05:36 PM: The methodology and assumptions used in this paper are as follows:
    "While it is true that exports support jobs in the United States, it is equally true that imports displace them. The net effect of trade flows on employment is determined by changes in the trade balance.The employment impacts of growing trade deficits are estimated in this paper using an input-output model that estimates the direct and indirect labor requirements of producing output in a given domestic industry. The model includes 201 U.S. industries, 84 of which are in the manufacturing sector.

    The model estimates the amount of labor (number of jobs) required to produce a given volume of exports and the labor displaced when a given volume of imports is substituted for domestic output. The net of these two numbers is essentially the jobs lost due to growing trade deficits, holding all else equal." (EPI briefing paper #219)
    Take it for what it is.


    roger wrote on July 31, 2008 04:42 PM: The leadership Randy is corporate executives sending jobs offshore to increase the bottom line and rake it massive compensation incentives. See, other countries love doing business with the USA becuase they know us Americans are more than willing to put ourselves in debt to buy something. You're right about wages too...they have been stagnant for at least 8 years while property values have gone thru the roof.. and didnt it strike anyone as odd that people were STILL able to buy new and bigger houses? How did that happen?
    And Mr. Chan I guess I am confused over your comments..we have a $100B trade deficit with China right now. China has a per capita income of around $6000.. so who exactly is gaining all these high paying jobs you are refering to? Oh, China also has a gini index of 47, so are we talking about the wealthy Chinese only ?


    RANDY wrote on July 31, 2008 04:12 PM: NO COUNTRY CAN EXPORT JOBS AND IN PORT WORKERS AND STAY A SUPER-POWER. THE CORPORATE MENTALITY WILL DESTROY THE MIDDLE CLASS. THE DAMAGE TO THE ECONOMY HAS ALREADY BEEN EVIDENT. THE WAGES HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED BECAUSE OF A UNFAIR PLAYING FIELD WITH CHINA. WE WON'T EVEN CLOSE OUR BORDERS WITH MEXICO TO STEM THE FLOOD OF ILLEGAL WORKERS. THE HOUSING MARKET COLLAPSED BECAUSE YOU CAN'T INFLATE HOUSING PRICES AND NOT THE WAGES. IT GOES HAND IN HAND. WE HAVE COME TO A POINT IN TIME WHERE WE CAN'T BORROW OUR WAY OUT OF THIS ECONOMIC MESS. WE GOT TO GO BACK TO BEING A MANUFACTURING AND EXPORTING ECONOMY INSTEAD OF A BORROWING AND IMPORTING ECONOMY. WHERE'S THE LEADERSHIP ON THIS?


    LV High School Diploma Real Estate Broker wrote on July 31, 2008 03:26 PM: Housing, Economy Still Far From Recovery: Greenspan
    Thursday July 31, 4:44 pm ET

    Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said the US is “nowhere near the bottom” of the housing slump.

    Considering he's mainly responsible, I'm sure he knows what he's talking about.

    Get ready for another 30% drop in LV real estate price in 2008 and 2009, Hopefully your house will be worth something in 2010.....


    ralph wrote on July 31, 2008 01:40 PM: Good going Nevada!! Keep raising taxes and fees and regulations until all the jobs are gone.


    Read All Comments