Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


General Growth faces financial shortfall

Mall company delays developments as mounting debt comes due




Credit woes that disrupted General Growth Properties' participation in Boyd Gaming's $4.8 billion Echelon resort represent just a small portion of the financial challenges facing the mall company that owns some of the priciest real estate on the Strip.

The Chicago-based company that owns Fashion Show and luxury malls in The Venetian and Palazzo resorts has more than $2.5 billion in debt maturing by the end of the year, $3.3 billion in 2009 and $17.6 billion by 2011.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle
  • THE STRIP: License backed for Aria




  • The debt is coming due at a time when credit markets are dry, real estate values are stagnant or in decline and low consumer confidence is squeezing retailers who rent space in General Growth malls and other shopping centers across the country.

    In addition to the delay at Echelon, General Growth officials announced they will delay development of the Shops at Summerlin Centre, a project with 1.4 million square feet of mixed-use space near Red Rock Resort.

    They also floated the possibility of selling bonds backed by Fashion Show and other malls and refinancing loans against the Shoppes at Palazzo and the Grand Canal Shoppes in The Venetian.

    "They have much too much debt for their cash flow. And quite a few of their properties are underwater," said Reggie Middleton, a Brooklyn, N.Y., investor who has published in-depth analyses of General Growth Properties on his Web site, Boombustblog.com. "If they do pay it off by some act of God, they still have 2009, 2010 and 2011."

    General Growth officials rejected multiple interview requests.

    Financing shortfalls are an unfamiliar scenario for General Growth, a company that used the economic boom of recent years to leverage its way to become the second-largest real estate investment trust in the country.

    The buying binge culminated in 2004 when General Growth bought the Rouse Co., for about $14 billion, which gave it control of Fashion Show and the Summerlin Centre project. The Rouse deal also included Boston's Faneuil Hall Marketplace, South Street Seaport in Lower Manhattan and Baltimore's Inner Harbor.

    General Growth stock peaked around $67 per share last year in March. Since then, it has fallen below $30.

    Neither that General Growth was highly leveraged compared to similar companies nor signs that retail real estate was peaking before the company's debt would come due raised red flags in the corporate offices of Boyd Gaming, which announced in May 2007 that General Growth would be a joint venture partner on Echelon.

    "A lot of businesses back in that time were in much different shape than they are today. I don't think it is a reflection of their depth or experience or professionalism," said Boyd Gaming spokesman Rob Stillwell.

    A closer look at General Growth then could have shown potential for trouble down the road.

    The company has more than $25 billion in debt and, compared to similar companies, a greater share is secured directly with real estate assets.

    Fitch Ratings mentioned the debt late last year when it rated General Growth at "BB," a junk-level status.

    "The use of secured debt in the capital structure encumbering substantially all assets serves to limit flexibility in a more difficult capital-raising environment," Fitch wrote in November.

    Since then, the debt markets have worsened. Also, the Fitch rating praised General Growth's "sizable future development pipeline," which has since shrunk.

    After General Growth reported earnings last week, the company's stock dropped 15 percent in value and three credit ratings firms downgraded the company, according to the online publication Chicago Business.

    The debt is clearly making investors nervous.

    "Fundamentals are deteriorating and continued refinancing risk is exacerbated by higher leverage and capital constraints," Citigroup analysts wrote in a report quoted by Chicago Business.

    Digging its way out from under the debt will be difficult for General Growth.

    Company officials have suggested they may rely on the unencumbered portions of the company portfolio to back refinancing plans. They have said repeatedly they won't sell properties at "fire sale" prices.

    They haven't, however, announced any specific plans for refinancing the debt, other than that they intend to do it.

    With more than 200 properties in 45 states, the General Growth Properties portfolio was valued at nearly $32 billion last fall, according to Fitch. Its assets were valued at $28.8 billion at the end of 2007, according to Google Finance. In addition to malls on the Strip and Summerlin Centre, it owns Meadows and Boulevard malls.

    The company has a strong track record of balancing large amounts of debt and creating successful malls, which analysts have said works in its favor.

    Whether it is enough goodwill to avoid resorting to drastic measures to stay ahead of debts during the downturn remains to be seen.

    Stifel Nicolaus analysts quoted by Chicago Business said the outlook for General Growth could worsen before it gets better.

    "General Growth continues to face significant balance sheet challenges, but mall demand headwinds are increasing faster than we expected," they wrote.

    Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3861.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 9 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    mike wrote on August 15, 2008 09:36 PM: Looks as if Reggie's prediction is correct. I was reading on his blog 6 months ago about the pending problems for GGP. Guess the numbers never lie. I'm not promoting but his site is a worthwhile read, unless head in the vegas sand is a better technique. God
    I love this town!


    Patrick wrote on August 09, 2008 04:13 PM: Stop the blogs. That is the whole point of the blog. I have seen your statement before James (I am assuming it is the same person). I wonder if you are the many people who still hold on a believe that Vegas's resurgance is right around the corner. If you don't like the blogs, than don't blog.

    This is America and freedom of speech is a beautiful thing.


    ed wrote on August 09, 2008 03:29 PM: Editorial integrity??? lol yeah right, these are not real journalists, this is probably the worst newspaper in the country!

    The comments suit it just fine.


    James wrote on August 09, 2008 01:26 PM: I'd like to remind readers that none of those making comments below are experts in anything except spouting their ill-conceived opinions. The RJ MUST stop anonymous commenting on its stories to protect its editorial integrity.


    Rev Wright wrote on August 09, 2008 12:40 PM: Oh my brothers and sisters, the chickens have come home to roost! G D America!


    Rev Wright wrote on August 09, 2008 12:40 PM: Oh my brothers and sisters, the chickens have come home to roost!


    Paul wrote on August 09, 2008 08:48 AM: When the casinos changed their business models from a mix of upscale and affordability, they shot themselves in the foot. Vegas survived other recessions due to our affordability. When califonians were planning their vacations in recessions past, Vegas always came out on top, because it was fun and CHEAP. Visitors also enjoyed the opulance with a low budget.

    Casinos bosses are all fishing for the same whales, now that the whales are becoming an endangered species, the casinos are hurting. If they would of stuck with the 'old' casinos they would still be profitable.


    Patrick wrote on August 09, 2008 07:26 AM: A BIG problem I see for Las Vegas as a whole is that a few corporations own the majority of Las Vegas developments. If for some reason just one of these companies start to have financial or business issues, all of Las Vegas could suffer.


    No Vaseline wrote on August 09, 2008 06:21 AM: If all written above is true, they and their projects are dead!

    This will become a hard blow for LV. New owners or a commercial short sale is the only solution.