Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Business

Saturday
Jul 31, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 101° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


ENERGY: Lingering question: 'Who's thinking link?'

Observers wonder who will build north-south power conduit

It's the $350 million-dollar question for insiders in the electric utility industry.

Who will build a transmission line to provide a direct link between Nevada Power Co. of Las Vegas and Sierra Pacific Power Co. of Reno?


Most Popular Stories
  1. Boyd won't bid on Station Casinos' properties
  2. Silverton to restore part of employees' slashed pay
  3. Bank of NLV ordered to increase its capital
  4. Shares of gaming companies wilt in July
  5. IN BRIEF
  6. FTC: No more upfront fees for companies to help consumers



Will it be LS Power, an independent power producer?

Or Sierra Pacific Resources?

Or the Southern Nevada Water Authority?

Or all of them?

The answer remains a mystery.

East Brunswick, N.J.-based LS Power confirmed Wednesday that it has proceeded with its own plans by filing an application with the Public Utilities Commission to build a 234-mile transmission line from the new Thirtymile Substation northwest of Ely to the Harry Allen Substation northeast of Las Vegas.

The utilities commission is charged with deciding whether the Southwest Intertie Project is environmentally acceptable.

Meanwhile, Sierra Pacific Resources, the holding company for the two utility companies, and the water authority say they plan to build their own transmission lines along similar routes.

Sierra Pacific Resources spokesman Adam Grant said the utility company will continue to pursue its own plans for a transmission line despite the LS Power filing.

"It doesn't change our process," Grant said.

Water authority spokesman J.C. Davis said the water utility has determined it will need to build its own 230-kilovolt line even if it tapped into LS Power's proposed line, because of engineering constraints. The water authority, which needs electricity to pump water from wells and along a planned $3.5 billion water line from the Ely area to Las Vegas, says LS Power's proposed line will not suit its needs.

The water authority needs lower voltage than the proposed LS Power line and would require "a lot of off-ramps," which make tying into the LS Power line impractical, Davis said.

"Building our own lower voltage line with all of the off-ramps we need was a more economic alternative in our analysis," Davis said.

LS Power seems to be ahead of the electric and water authority in the permitting process. But there are doubts whether LS Power could sell enough of the power line capacity if Sierra Pacific Power and Nevada Power aren't interested.

Mark Milburn, LS Power's project development director, declined to comment about possible conversations with the electric power utilities or water utility.

"There's a lot of interest, and the interest is significant enough for us to move forward with an open season," Milburn said.

An open season is a period during which an electrical transmission line builder takes commitments from companies interested in paying to ship power through the line.

The company hopes to sell transmission service to renewable energy producers and others who need access to the Western electric grid.

If LS Power gets enough commitments, it intends to start building the transmission line next year and to complete it by 2010. The line would cost between $350 million and $470 million.

Eric Witkoski, chief of the attorney general's Bureau of Consumer Protection, suggested the utilities, water district and LS Power might find some way to work together, such as using the same transmission line poles for all three power lines.

Contact reporter John G. Edwards at jedwards@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0420.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (4)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

Buck to pass wrote on September 11, 2008 03:26 PM: I know the answer...whatever company has investors that are also elected officials. PAY ATTENTION TO THIS ONE!!!


Report abuse

Ugly American wrote on September 11, 2008 09:35 AM: Oh so now it turns out the $5B coal plant needs a $500M transmission line or two on top of the $700M a year in fuel costs because they didn't include the cost of actually connecting it to anything.

We have one of the largest solar power component factories in the world here in Vegas but they end up shipping their parts all over the world because our regulators are in the pocket of big coal. The same capacity worth of solar could be built just outside Vegas for less than $4B based on the real finished costs of the existing Nevada Solar One (which includes storage & backup natural gas turbines). Those jobs would be here in Vegas, that power would be here in Vegas. There would be almost no fuel costs or pollution.


Report abuse

Vegas Vic wrote on September 11, 2008 03:45 AM: All of the parties involved seem to think that this power line construction permitting will be a done deal. Have any of them taken into consideration the number of lawsuits against this construction that will be filed by the eco-terrorists? Their upper price of $470 million will be a pittance when they also factor in the costs of fighting those lawsuits


Report abuse

Vegas Vic wrote on September 11, 2008 03:19 AM: All of the parties involved seem to think that this power line construction permitting will be a done deal. Have any of them taken into consideration the number of lawsuits against this construction that will be filed by the eco-terrorists? Their upper price of $470 million will be a pittance when they also factor in the costs of fighting those lawsuits.