Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
Business


Gaming companies boosted by elections in three states

Nevada-based casino operators and slot machine manufacturers were the beneficiaries as voters in three states Tuesday approved ballot initiatives that expanded legalized gambling opportunities.

One Wall Street analyst suggested the election of a new governor in Delaware might mean Nevada could pick up competition from the state in the legalized sports wagering field.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License backed for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle
  • Credit union changes hands




  • Exactly when companies will benefit from the expected revenue boost provided by voters was unclear to Wall Street, where analysts have been looking for some good news to boost sagging stock prices in the gaming sector.

    "The overall election results were mostly in line with our expectations," Susquehanna gaming analyst Robert LaFleur told investors Wednesday. "The combination of high voter turnout and the potential of gaming as an economic stimulus were catalysts to get enough votes this year."

    In Maryland, voters overwhelmingly approved the addition of 15,000 slot machines at five different locations. The estimated 48 percent to 51 percent tax on gaming revenues would be directed toward the state's educational fund.

    Missouri voters repealed a loss limit in which gamblers were held to $500 in losses every two hours. In exchange for Las Vegas-style gambling, the state's casinos agreed to a 1 percentage point increase in the gaming tax.

    In Colorado, voters allowed the state's casinos to increase wagering limits to $100, extend gambling to 24 hours, and add craps and roulette to the table games mix.

    Most analysts said Las Vegas-based casino operators Ameristar Casinos, which operates properties in Missouri and Colorado; and Pinnacle Entertainment, which has a casino in St. Louis and is building second resort in the market; hit the jackpot.

    "The big winner on election night was Ameristar," Wachovia gaming analyst Brian McGill said. "The $500 loss limit has been talked about for years and was thought to have held back revenue at its two casinos (in St. Charles and Kansas City). It will now be up to Ameristar to drive the additional revenue to increase its (cash flow)."

    McGill said Pinnacle's Lumiere Place in St. Louis is now on a level playing field with casinos across the river in Illinois, which didn't operate with a loss limit.

    LaFleur said the election of Democrat Jack Markell as Delaware's new governor might help the state legalize sports wagering. Delaware, along with Nevada, Oregon and New Jersey, are exempted from a 1992 federal law banning sports wagering. Only Nevada casinos operate legalized race and sports books.

    Markell told the state's media he would consider sports wagering as a revenue source and LaFleur thought the issue might come up next year in the Delaware Legislature.

    Slot machine makers, such as Bally Technologies, International Game Technology and WMS Industries, are expected to cash in on the Maryland vote, which my take several years to implement. The facilities will need to be built, and approval by local governments is also required.

    Still, once the market is up and running, the annual effect on earnings per share could be anywhere from 7 cents to 10 cents per share, depending upon a company's market size. Each of the five casinos could add 3,000 machines.

    "Additional slot capacity in the northeast gaming market from Maryland could pressure existing gaming operators in Atlantic City and West Virginia," Deutsche Bank gaming analyst Bill Lerner said.

    Penn National Gaming, which has been seeking to expand its casino footprint, owns a potential slot machine location in Maryland.

    Gaming issues failed in two other states. A proposal by Lakes Entertainment to build a casino in Ohio was soundly defeated by voters. In Maine, voters rejected a referendum that would have allowed Las Vegas-based Olympia Group to build a casino in Oxford County.

    Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3871.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Sad Summerlin wrote on November 06, 2008 08:06 PM: patrick... again... you are talking about something you know nothing about...

    Have you played in Casinos outside of Las Vegas? They are quite a bit "tighter" to use common terminology. The profit margins in Las Vegas are far lower than the margins that in the regional casinos.

    This is quite often due to the repressive tax rates in the regional locations.

    But that doesn't stop business expansion... corporations want to grow and expand and they will compete for these new areas since there will be a significant less amount of competition...

    People come to Vegas because the slots are "looser", they can get more "Comps", they can enjoy the environment... Raising taxes here will only make Las Vegas less competitive to the other States...

    Now why do you think Missouri and Colorado repealed some of their repressive gaming laws? To be more competitive...

    And while regional markets are growing and expanding and becoming more competitive to Las Vegas... simple minds like you want to raise taxes... and stifle competition...


    patrick wrote on November 06, 2008 07:18 PM: Hmm, so casino companies spent MILLIONS of dollars, lobbying for the CHANCE to operate in jurisdictions where they will be TAXED at 50% rates.

    And people wonder why Nevadan's feel a little screwed every time they want to increase taxes by 1/4 of a percent up to MAYBE 7% and the casinos fight it tooth an nail.

    Then "honest" citizens like "Joe Bama" talk about greedy Nevadans.

    Hmmm


    Joe Bama wrote on November 06, 2008 11:09 AM: Good timing voting to raise the room rate taxes.If ccsd teachers were counting on more money i hope they all went to dealers school so they can supplement their income, dealing cards to each other


    casinocon wrote on November 06, 2008 11:00 AM: Bad news for Vegas -- everyone I talk to that visits here (and it is rare that I find one) has gaming near them.


    Fred T. wrote on November 06, 2008 10:39 AM: No doubt that Delaware will legalize sports betting. This will definitely affect Nevada during the Sweet Sixteen and Super Bowl times. I've met groups of guys who flew here from the East Coast to watch and bet on their Alma Maters during the BBall playoffs. Just another dent in the Las Vegas economy. Hey, I've got a bridge to sell you-at the Venetian, where their stock has cratered to 7 bucks. Keep the day job, kids.