Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
Business


Reid: Reconsider plans for coal-burning plants

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday urged Gov. Jim Gibbons to reconsider plans for three coal-fired power plants in the wake of a recent federal regulatory decision.

In a letter to the Republican governor, Reid, D-Nev., cited a Nov. 13 decision that directs the Environmental Protection Agency to explain why it didn't consider requiring reduction of carbon dioxide from a coal-fired power project in Utah. In addition, the Environmental Appeals Board recommended EPA adopt a national policy for dealing with carbon dioxide, which scientists say leads to global warming.


Most Popular Stories
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • Fraud with Portent
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • REAL ESTATE: Short sales on the rise
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Airport suffers another decline
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy




  • Because of the board's ruling, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection "cannot move forward with any legal certainty" in approving air permits for three coal power projects in Nevada, Reid said. Approving final air permits, Reid said, would put "billions of dollars of Nevadans' investments (in coal projects) in great jeopardy."

    Mendy Elliott, deputy chief of staff for the governor, said she and other officials in the governor's office have been meeting with legislators and haven't seen Reid's letter.

    Sanjay Narayan, senior staff attorney for the Sierra Club, has said the board ruling makes it risky for the Nevada division to grant final air permits until the EPA adopts a policy on carbon dioxide emissions.

    The developers of the three coal-fired power projects in Nevada have received draft permits, but the state agency has not made a decision on a final air permit for any of them. They are the Ely Energy Center that NV Energy proposes to build near Ely, the White Pine Energy Station that LS Power proposes to construct in the same area and the Toquop Energy Project that Sithe Global Power wants to build outside of Mesquite.

    The EPA case stems from plans by the Deseret Electric Cooperative to expand a power plant near Bonanza, Utah.

    While that case was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts vs. EPA that carbon dioxide is an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act of 1977.

    The EPA approved a final air permit for the Bonanza coal project, but the Sierra Club appealed to the Environmental Appeals Board.

    The environmental board directed the EPA to reopen the Bonanza case and reconsider carbon dioxide restrictions. If EPA determined no carbon dioxide reduction was needed at the Utah plant, EPA should explain why, the board said.

    The decision "makes it overwhelmingly clear that the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection cannot move forward with legal certainty in granting final air quality to any of the proposed coal-fired power plants currently being considered in Nevada unless such permits consider the extremely high greenhouse gas emissions from those plants," Reid said in the letter.

    Reid asked Gibbons to "join with me in putting Nevada quickly on a cleaner (path) toward a renewable energy and efficiency-driven economy and safer future."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 28 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Envirominded wrote on December 02, 2008 02:14 PM: Hey Harry, you know what doesn't have 'extremely high greenhouse gas emissions?' Nuclear power ... and there create good jobs, too.


    Fair and Balanced Fred on "HELENWEILS" wrote on November 26, 2008 07:15 PM: Just so everyone knows:

    HELENWEILS is an apocalyptic Christian nut, likely paranoid personality disorder, who cites Nostradamus {I kid you not) and mainly supports ever increasing welfare for Israel to fulfill her vision of Jesus coming back and taking over.

    Makes sense to me.


    Harry Reid is being paid by someone!? wrote on November 26, 2008 04:23 PM: Harry Reid constantly trying to curtail clean coal-fired power is troubling to me. I think he's being paid under the table by some other entity.
    When did crazy Harry Reid become such an expert in environmental science???
    If he'd shut his trap for once I think the world would be a much better place!!!


    Lars Ulno wrote on November 26, 2008 04:16 PM: "If you don't like the way we do things in this country, I suggest you leave."

    Wow, way to demonstrate your vaunted ideals. I somehow think China and its dictatorship would be a better fit for you.



    Nuc em Todd wrote on November 26, 2008 02:01 PM:

    href="http://www.lvrj.com/subscribe/"> src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41o2J7IQdML._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA240_SH20_OU01_.jpg" hspace=5>


    Geothermal Toxic Waste a Problem wrote on November 26, 2008 01:38 PM: Geothermal sites often are located in protected wilderness areas that environmentalists do not want disturbed.

    The level of emissions from geothermal are quite varied and depend on both the geothermal resource as the technology used and the geography.

    Geothermal plants require injecting "highly toxic acids" into virgin geothermal wells to increase geothermal power production. That will create groundwater pollution and pose a threat to trout and other wildlife in the regional watershed.

    In some applications there can be CO2 emissions, heavy requirements for cooling water--as much as 100,000 gallons per MW per day--hydrogen sulfide emissions, waste disposal issues with dissolved solids, and even toxic waste.

    Geothermal power plants tend to emit hydrogen sulfide (H2S)--which is toxic at fairly low levels--and mercury
    Whatever is not reinjected into the ground can cause local groundwater pollution. geothermal plants would require excavating RCRA toxic hazardous waste sumps.

    Geothermal fluids are always foul smelling--they smell like very rotten eggs due to the H2S. The fluids are highly brackish and contain high levels of heavy metals."

    Geothermal power plants are linked to increased seismic activity. The folks in Anderson, California, and other areas surrounding Geysers steamfield, the world's largest developed geothermal field, have fairly complained about induced seismicity brought about by geothermal operations. The seismic activity results when reinjected materials replace extracted steam.


    laughing wrote wrote on November 26, 2008 01:35 PM: laughing wrote

    If you don't like the way we do things in this country, I suggest you leave.

    I guess that sums up how the Obama crowd feels about minority taxpaying ratepaying 47%.


    laughing wrote on November 26, 2008 12:43 PM: These comments are so funny. All of you "nattering nabobs of negativism" probably voted for Bush, right? When will you learn that your ideas are ridiculous? If you don't like the way we do things in this country, I suggest you leave. If you don't like regulation of pollution and smart growth, go to China. The conservative/libertarian way of doing things has ruined this country, and we are on a course for change!


    Ugly American wrote on November 26, 2008 11:24 AM: As far as I know, none of the coal plants have set aside money for power lines to Vegas.

    They were all designed to send power to California.

    We would get the fallout and they would get the power.

    Do you still wanna pay for them?

    Yes I said fallout. On a power for power basis, coal plants release more radioactivity than nuclear plants because they burn millions of tons of coal each every year (7M tons estimated for the Eli plant). They also release mercury and other heavy metals as well as sulfur that acidifies the rain decreaseing crop and fish yields.

    The DOE and MIT have shown that Nevada is one of the very best places in the entire world for geothermal and solar energy. By contrast, all our coal has to be brought in from other states.

    Nevada can be and should be a solar and geothermal power exporter.


    Jeff S wrote on November 26, 2008 11:11 AM: Did Dirty Harry get an "Air Permit" for all of his carbon dioxide emissions?


    Read All Comments