Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
Business


INSIDE GAMING: States eye gambling to close budget gaps

Nevada is not alone. A recent study by the Washington, D.C.-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that 41 states have faced or are facing budget shortfalls this year or next.

Some states, like Nevada, cut spending or used reserves to shore up the rest of the fiscal year. Other states raised revenues (i.e., taxes).


Most Popular Stories
  • Mayor calls Lady Luck casino 'carcass'
  • CASINOS IN COURT: Testimony heard in Wynn case
  • Consolidated Resorts files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy
  • Players turned away at WSOP
  • Fontainebleau files motion to leave offices
  • Area economy hits 'pause' period, economist says
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Local gaming veteran sees opportunity in small Henderson casino
  • ONLINE GUY: Palm Pre promising but not ready to replace Apple iPhone in pocket
  • Las Vegas investor seeks approval of Riviera ownership stake
  • GAMING BEYOND NEVADA: Sands: Macau back in play




  • The center predicted the $48 billion in budget gaps would likely grow because of the unsettled economy.

    Gaming expansion, either legalizing casino gambling or increasing existing gaming taxes, could solve budget problems for some state lawmakers in 2009.

    "States may choose to add or in some cases increase sin taxes, such as gaming taxes, which is far more politically palatable to politicos than increasing sales, property or corporate taxes," Deutsche Bank analyst Andrew Zarnett said after reading the study.

    Zarnett pointed to history. In the early 1990s, several states had large budget deficits. Midwestern and Southern states legalized riverboat casinos and slot machine parlors, using gaming taxes to reduce the shortfalls. A similar scenario could take shape next year.

    In November, voters in Colorado and Missouri approved gaming and rolled back some gambling restrictions. In exchange, casinos agreed to gaming-tax increases. Maryland voters paved the way for 15,000 slot machines at five locations statewide. The center said all three states face budget shortfalls.

    Voters in two states rejected casino initiatives, but they are likely to resurface. Zarnett thought Kentucky, Ohio and Massachusetts would re-explore legalizing casinos. New Jersey's racetracks may want to add slot machines to compete with racinos in neighboring Pennsylvania.

    "Politicians continue to see gaming as a convenient source of funds to plug budget caps," Zarnett said.

    Slot machine makers love the talk of gaming expansion. Visions of increased sales and profits dance around company board rooms. The Association of Gaming Equipment Manufacturers gave $100,000 to help fund the pro-slot machine effort in Maryland.

    Casino operators, however, are less hesitant to enter the fray. The dried-up credit and lending market has all but killed gaming expansion. Planned projects in some of the industry's top revenue-producing jurisdictions, including Las Vegas, Atlantic City and Biloxi, Miss., have been put on indefinite hold.

    Kansas, which enacted pro-casino laws in 2007, is learning that gaming expansion doesn't always go as planned.

    Most of the major casino companies, including MGM Mirage, Las Vegas Sands Corp. and Penn National Gaming, withdrew proposed Kansas development plans for varying reasons. Harrah's Entertainment and Cordish Gaming dropped out because of the current economic climate.

    Howard Stutz's Inside Gaming column appears Sundays. E-mail him at hstutz @reviewjournal.com or call 702-477-3871.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 0 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.