Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


Experts say it's plain: Housing pain to remain

Observer says fate of LV home market tied to foreclosures







Las Vegas, once the darling of the nation's housing boom, is feeling unloved for the holidays.

Median home prices have dropped 30 percent in the past year, foreclosures have doubled and the inventory of homes for sale in the valley is hovering around 23,000, slightly below its all-time high.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • THE STRIP: License backed for Aria
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle




  • It's been a precipitous fall from 2004, when Las Vegas home values appreciated 40 percent and 50 percent in consecutive quarters and buyers were qualifying for mortgages with little or no documentation of creditworthiness.

    Too many people bought too much home with too much credit. Some called it "creative financing."

    Foreclosures now account for 60 percent to 70 percent of monthly home sales in Las Vegas and their median price is $166,000, which is below replacement cost in most cases, housing analyst Larry Murphy of Las Vegas-based SalesTraq said.

    New-home construction has fallen to its lowest level in 30 years. Fewer than 6,000 new residential building permits will be pulled this year, less than half of last year's total.

    With an estimated 15,000 real estate-owned properties held by banks, the picture won't get any prettier in the coming year, Murphy said.

    Most analysts agree it will get worse before it gets better.

    "We're still trying to get this patient stabilized, not up and running a marathon," Murphy said. "I think we're getting to that point where conditions will stop getting worse. They're just going to stay bad."

    Real estate consultant John Burns said the U.S. economy is in the early stages of a downward spiral. It will take significant government intervention to avoid double-digit unemployment rates.

    "In our opinion, the root of the problem is falling home prices, which is leading to massive bank and investment losses, which is shutting down capital flow, which leads to job losses, which leads to more foreclosures and thus falling home prices," Burns said.

    "Foreclosures are the whole key to the housing situation right now and that will continue through 2009," Dennis Smith of Home Builders Research added. "There's no magic switch to click it off."

    Although new-home sales in Las Vegas have declined 46 percent to 9,134 through October, the resale segment is regaining strength with more than 3,000 closings in four straight months, Home Builders Research reported.

    Some of that demand will eventually find its way to the new-home segment, said Jeff Canarelli, vice president of sales for Las Vegas-based American West Homes.

    "This is obviously based on the assumption that the rate of foreclosures will decrease at some point," he said. "Foreclosures are making the largest impact on housing in terms of both alternative competition for buyers and diminished value from appraisers."

    American West has whittled the price of a new home to $99 a square foot at its Newcastle at Highlands Ranch subdivision in the southern Las Vegas Valley. Canarelli said he hasn't seen those prices since 2004. He sold 12 homes in the first two weeks of the grand opening in October.

    The home builder has worked diligently with its subcontractors to reduce construction costs and price new homes competitively with resales and foreclosures, Canarelli said.

    "This has to be the floor for the price of a new home," he said. "We are fairly certain the costs are at the bottom."

    New-home sales peaked at nearly 1.3 million units nationally in 2005 as consumers "stole demand from the future," Tim Sullivan of Sullivan Group Real Estate Advisors said. Now they're giving it back.

    With the "overhang" of new-home supply, Sullivan expects sales to fall to 1981 levels.

    Daily news about financial institutions crumbling and economic uncertainty has dragged U.S. consumer confidence to 40-year lows. Steady employment is the cornerstone of consumer confidence, Sullivan said, and that's what will drive spending.

    "Economists will tell you consumer confidence is the hardest indicator to model. It's emotional. Other (economic) indicators are based on data," Sullivan said.

    Most of the events in the past 12 months have been unprecedented, as were market conditions between 2004 and 2007, research analyst Jeremy Aguero of Las Vegas-based Applied Analysis said.

    Historically low interest rates combined with skyrocketing home prices fueled record home equity extraction, which pushed the local and national economies to new highs, Aguero said.

    Although the negative effects of the financial crisis and beaten-down consumer confidence cannot be ignored, Aguero said, it would be a mistake to dismiss the potential impact of the government's $700 billion bailout package and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, which provides $70 million to buy foreclosed properties in Nevada.

    "This is the time for patience and prudence, not panic," he said. "We expect to start seeing measurable impacts of these actions by the close of 2008."

    The market will bottom out when the number of bank-owned properties sold exceeds the number going into foreclosure, SalesTraq's Murphy said. He counted 2,454 foreclosures in October, while bank-owned sales came to about 86 percent of that total.

    We won't know we've reached bottom until we're past it and prices start to rise, broker Tim Kelly Kiernan of ReMax Brodkin Group said. With more than 200 notices of defaults going out every day, foreclosures will continue to plague the market.

    Kiernan suggests there are some 10,000 real estate-owned, or bank-owned, properties waiting to hit the market in Las Vegas. He's advising clients not to sell unless they absolutely must and they're willing to bring money to the table upon closing.

    Buyers have to make strong offers on REOs and short sales. They won't be able to "low-ball" the banks, Kiernan said.

    "In general, this is a unique real estate market here in Las Vegas, to say the least," the REO specialist said. "The rules have changed dramatically, and it depends on which side of the fence you're on. We may never see this type of market again. In most areas, prices are back to 2002 and 2003."

    Kelly Maguire, president of BDG Enterprises and a former mortgage company executive, believes Las Vegas became "patient zero" for the subprime mortgage crisis.

    It was the first domino to fall and had "deleterious effects" on a number of large companies, many of which failed subsequent to the initial collapse in Las Vegas, he noted.

    "Looking back, I'm close to being confident that the start of this was right here in our own backyard," Maguire said. "When you look at the real estate bubble and the overinflated, excessive behavior that may prove the driving force behind the overarching crisis, what better market to use as a glittering jewel of failed discipline?"

    The subprime mortgage crisis has eased with the tightening of credit requirements, said Chris Biaggi, president of All Western Mortgage in Las Vegas. Although he's still financing people, dealing with the challenges has gotten tougher, he said.

    "What we're seeing is first-time home buyers are back," Biaggi said. "Prices have dropped to a level that's affordable for just about anybody. And investors are back. Those are the two. There's not a lot of move-ups."

    Federal Housing Administration is still the financing of choice, he said.

    The goal of home ownership -- the "cornerstone of America" -- got us into this mess and it will lead us out, Jack Haynes of Countrywide Home Loans said. Demand will come from all demographic segments, including baby boomers, echo boomers, Generation X and Hispanics.

    In "Wealth of Nations," published in 1776, Scottish economist Adam Smith talks about the "invisible hand," Haynes said.

    "That's the government," he said. "So we've got to be mindful that the process is long and protracted. This is a deliberate process and a process that's going to take time. We're going to have to be patient, but the alternative is what?"

    Canarelli said he hopes the bailout is used to help potential buyers gain access to housing through interest rate buy-downs and down-payment assistance in the form of a true tax rebate.

    "The bailout is going to work for someone," he said. "If the money is used to help banks and note holders become whole on bad loans, the most benefit will go to the banks and those buyers who overextended themselves."

    Buyers still prefer new homes and the advantages that come with buying new homes over existing homes, Canarelli said. They want neighborhoods with nice schools and parks and streets that are well maintained. It's just a matter of affording the home they want, he said.

    Housing starts could take any number of paths over the next several years, the Congressional Budget Office reported in November.

    The optimistic scenario is based on the possibility that much of the rise in vacant units for rent from 2000 to 2004 -- some 700,000 units -- stemmed from a permanent upward shift in the underlying vacancy rate to above 1990 levels.

    Under this scenario, housing starts are already at their trough. Activity begins to rebound late this year to about 980,000 housing starts. It grows to 1.27 million starts in 2009 and 1.72 million in 2010.

    The cyclical downturn scenario starts from the estimate that 1.3 million excess vacant units at the end of the second quarter would not be eliminated by the current low levels of new construction or by fewer mobile-home shipments.

    Housing starts would remain below recent levels at 940,000 in 2008 and 810,000 in 2009, finally recovering to 1.23 million in 2010.

    In the pessimistic scenario, the 1.1 million vacant units resulting from above-normal growth since 1996 are excess vacancies, bringing the number of vacant units to 2.4 million. Adverse cyclical and financial conditions reduce household formation by 700,000 more units.

    Housing starts would continue to decline, from 930,000 in 2008 to 600,000 in 2009 and 620,000 in 2010.

    "The rebound in construction would be slow, held back by the huge overhang of vacant units and weak household formation," the Congressional Budget Office report said.

    Despite the biggest declines in housing prices since the Great Depression, long-term homeowners who mortgaged rationally should retain significant value gains from many years of steady appreciation, Jonathan Miller wrote in a report for the Washington, D.C.-based Urban Land Institute.

    "In previous generations, people bought homes to live in and didn't look at them as wealth generators," he said. "That changed recently and people overreached. Home buying was oversold as a path to financial freedom."

    Despite government bailouts and stock market volatility, homeowners remain somewhat optimistic about the housing market, a survey by Zillow.com, an online real estate agency, found.

    Nearly half (49 percent) of U.S. homeowners believe their home is insulated from the nation's price declines. They think their home values have increased or stayed the same over the past year.

    Zillow reported that 74 percent of homes have lost value during that time.

    "After one of the most turbulent quarters in history for the U.S. economy and housing market, you'd expect the reality of dropping home values to start sinking in," Zillow Vice President Stan Humphries said.

    "We're seeing a fascinating distinction in consumer psychology," he said. "On the one hand, homeowners appear to understand the reality of today's economy and are curbing their household spending, but on the other hand, they still aren't ready to admit that these woes might extend to their own homes. There's clearly still some denial."

    Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 26 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    idiot wrote on December 24, 2008 04:31 PM: Good luck renting a $100,000 home for $1000/month long term. That statement shows how little you know about investing.


    jimbojones wrote on December 24, 2008 06:53 AM: Bye Bye Vegas! Bye Bye!


    Doom and Gloom wrote on December 23, 2008 12:52 PM: mlimberg - if I buy an "investment property" for $100,000 and rent it out to you for $1000/month - are you saying that is not an investment? If I put 25% down and only carry a note of $75,000, my monthly payment would only be around $500/month. So I "invest" $25,000 for a return of around $500/mo or $6000/year! If you ask me, that's a heck of a return on my investment!

    Keep renting mlimberg! You'll pay off my mortgage in no time! But I'm sorry, once you've paid it off for me, I'm not going to renew your lease. There will be other investors who will love you for paying off their mortgage too...so you shouldn't have much trouble finding a new place.


    mlimberg wrote on December 22, 2008 02:38 PM: Realtors say that the bottom happened yesterday and that home prices should again reach 2006 prices...

    Idiots.

    Do America a favor, never buy a house using a Realtor, they own most of the housing issues... remember 6% of 500k is better than 6% of 200k. Houses are expenses, not investments, never have been, never will be.


    Free Nevada wrote on December 22, 2008 02:09 AM: Here is up to $2 billion dollars that could potentially be shared with Vegas to run a 310mph maglev into the heart of Orange County by way of the Inland Empire.

    http://www.sr91-sr71project.info/

    Get this: It's only 6.1 minutes from Downtown San Bernardino to Anaheim Stadium at 310mph, though it would take 5 minutes to accelerate and 5 minutes to decelerate without discomfort to the passengers.

    All we need to do is have the maglev stop at a couple of football-field sized park-n-rides in the Inland Empire where it can pickup workers and carry them down to Anaheim Stadium where there are existing connections to the Metrolink that runs between Fullerton and Oceanside (including a stop in the Irvine Spectrum), the Amtrak that runs between Ventura and San Diego, Disneyland, The Pond, local employer shuttle buses that run all over Anaheim and Santa Ana and car rental agencies.
    The rider ship feeds will also help subsidize the cost of operating it for its longer (30-45 minute) trips to Vegas --and pulling a hundred thousand cars off the road during the weekdays postpones the environmentally painful expansion of the 91 for decades more so yeah I believe that California will share some of the $2 billion dollars with us to make that happen.


    lowball buyer wrote on December 21, 2008 07:43 PM: ssvt6 must have just bought in on a foreclosure.

    Congradulation


    ssvt6 wrote on December 21, 2008 05:28 PM: The fact is that it doesn't cost $100 a square foot to build the type of homes that are flooding the Vegas market - and people who come from elsewhere know that. That is why homes can be built brand new in North Vegas and sold for $75/sq ft - and a nice house in Texas can be bought for $100/sq.ft. (with sturdy walls, upgraded fixtures, composite counters and real carpet, bigger yard, etc.). The Vegas market is a product of greed and people hoping to cash in on real estate and now it has come back to bite them - that's what happens when you invest without knowledge of true cost and value. You all bought gold jewelery for retail mall prices and want to sell it for the value of the gold - only to find you paid 5 times what it is really worth.


    The market floor is set by the bankers wrote on December 21, 2008 03:51 PM: "these people are incapable of making sound financial decisions."

    It defies logic that many of these homeowner knew three or four years ago that their house would have up to 50% negative equity and therefore they would being “excluded from eligibility” by the banks.

    A market floor set by the bankers.

    Bankers are in a race to the bottom (selling at below $100/sq ft) to clear a foreclosured housing inventory.

    Banker are selling foreclosures below replacement cost.


    Free Nevada wrote on December 21, 2008 02:56 PM: 'JOBS', I have to agree with you about local construction halting because, for example, one of City Center's largest backers, Dubai World, is on its knees due to failing global investments (including City Center) and the price of oil dropping below what Saudi Arabia needs to break even. The media proclaim Encore and City Center's new employment but forget to mention what that increased competition means for the other, already struggling, properties (even those owned by the same companies that built Encore and City Center).

    But it's not doom-n-gloom --just like in 1931 and 1934 (Hoover and Parker Dam), I think the way out is a bond measure and capitulation on Yucca to gain federal support for a maglev providing 25,000 construction jobs and a quick 30-45 minute transit to the exponentially increasing gaming-friendly Asian communities that have grown from South Pasadena East to Claremont and as far South as Westminster and Irvine after the Asian Exclusion Act was repealed and we built Little Saigon after the fall of Hanoi (not to mention the hundreds of thousands of affluent OC retirees who would rather face certain loss at the hands of the Indians than trek the Mojave). Even without that economic bonus for the tourist industry, a maglev effectively puts many of the 2 million folks here in town 'in the game' for relatively high-paying commute-to jobs in Southern California. Here's what the technology looks like:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weWmTldrOyo


    DMCVegas wrote on December 21, 2008 02:54 PM: Bottom Line: We all knew that these mortgage deals were way too good to be true. For both the consumers, as well as the loan officers who approved them all. Many, many news stories in the past were done about people obtaining mortgages for homes using ARMs and "Creative Financing", and they all pointed towards a very bleak future with mass foreclosures.

    Both the borrowers as well as the banks are equally at fault for this crisis. I believe that for the borrowers, there should be some serious damage done to their credit. Not just to show that they defaulted on their loans, but footnotes to show how "Creative Financing" was used for them to obtain property. That should be data that future creditors should be able to mine out and obtain in order to determine that these people are incapable of making sound financial decisions. Let that remain on their credit for AT LEAST 10 YEARS.

    As for the Loan Officers who made all of this possible, I believe that some serious jail time should be handed down to a wide number of lenders who knew what kind of risky borrowers they were dealing with, and knew just how badly they were placing investors at risk. All the way from the initial lenders, to the sales of blocks of mortgages to Wall Street investors. If we can't regulate these people with laws, then let's at least try to create a "Chilling Effect" to keep them on their toes. If they lie about an applicant's qualifications in order to get them approved for a loan, then let them know they risk jail time. Call it a "Blue Sky" law to protect investors and borrowers alike from shady lenders.


    Read All Comments