Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


Local home sales up in March

Median prices decline to $149,000, down 38.7 percent from year earlier, statistics show

Following the trend of recent months, home sales in Las Vegas increased substantially in March from the same month a year ago while median prices continued to fall.

The Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors reported 2,980 single-family home sales during the month, a 30 percent increase from February and more than double the number from March 2008.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License backed for Aria
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle




  • The median price fell to $149,000, down 4.2 percent from the previous month and down 38.7 percent from a year ago.

    Inventory of units available for sale increased to 22,812 in March, compared with 22,142 in February. It's up 0.2 percent from a year ago.

    Realtors association President Sue Naumann said she didn't see any big surprises in the monthly statistics.

    "As prices drop, sales climb. It's pretty much the same we've had the entire quarter," she said. "Of course, we do have all that inventory out there, but it's holding steady. They're being cleaned out."

    It's good to see nearly 3,000 home sales in March, Naumann said. With interest rates at their lowest level since the 1960s and median prices under $150,000, people are encouraged by the return of housing affordability in Las Vegas.

    "I hate to sound like a parrot, but it's a buyer's market," the Realtor said. "What else defines a buyer's market? Unless they're giving them away."

    Rob Jenson of Re/Max Central in Las Vegas finds it interesting that inventory remains so high despite the increase in monthly sales. Inventory of single-family homes peaked in July and has stayed around 21,000 to 21,500 units, he said.

    Distressed sales accounted for 86 percent of closings in March. There were 2,252 foreclosure sales during the month, a 39.6 percent increase from February. Short sales, or homes sold for less than the balance owed, rose 17.7 percent to 193, Jenson reported.

    Las Vegas home prices have returned to the level of April 2002, said John Restrepo of Restrepo Consulting Group. Five to seven years of equity, some of it real and some of it on paper, have essentially been wiped out by the housing crash, he said.

    "In the long term, a return to some level of affordability is vital to the region's quality of life," he said. "However, in the short to intermediate term, it is very traumatic to consumer and business confidence."

    Realtors sold 604 condos and townhomes in March, more than triple the 198 units sold in the same month a year ago. The median sales price was $70,500, down 56.7 percent from a year ago.

    Realtor statistics are based on data collected through the Multiple Listing Service and do not necessarily account for homes sold by builders or owners or other transactions not involving a Realtor.

    Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Doom and Gloom wrote on April 09, 2009 10:55 AM: The numbers for single family home inventory is very misleading.

    What is missing from this, and the part that is misleading - is that GLVAR counts Pending and Contingent Sales as "Available."

    For Example, as of right now, there are 22,890 SFR homes listed as Contingent, Pending, and EA and ER (EA and ER is Exclusive Agency and Exclusive Rights - as the listing, but they do not have accepted contracts). If you take out the P and C sales, there are only 14,600 single family homes available.

    Now, I am a REALTOR, and if I am working with buyers, I would not show anything listed as pending or contingent....these houses have contracts on them....they are in the escrow process. And just because it is Contingent, does not mean it is a short sale waiting for bank approval. It can be contingent on inspections, financing, etc.

    I do not understand why GLVAR continues to count P and C sales in the available inventory. The only reason I can think of, is because that's just how it's always been done...and to change now (even though it's wrong) would not allow them to give year over year stats.

    How about the fact that right now, there are 8396 homes P or C....at this time last year, there was around 4000.


    whuhuh wrote on April 09, 2009 07:39 AM: Sue Naumann might be prez of the Realtors Assoc, but her statement doesn't jive with the facts. "They're being cleaned out" says she...while the stats show that the inventory actually went up by 670 units. Why did the reporter not challenge the statement by Naumann? Bad reporting...or typical smoke-screen by koolaid drinking parrots...I mean RE salefolks? I'm left feeling confused and suspicious, not informed. Nice job, Hubble...