Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
Business


Could the median price for existing homes in Las Vegas fall to $100,000?

Analyst proposes possibility at Crystal Ball seminar as valley values plummet







The $100,000 median-priced home -- written off as extinct in Las Vegas just a couple of years ago -- could return by the end of this year, a local housing analyst said Thursday.

If the 16 percent first-quarter depreciation rate continues for the next three quarters, that's where the median price will be for existing homes, Larry Murphy of Las Vegas-based SalesTraq said at his Crystal Ball housing seminar.


Most Popular Stories
  • Buyout to take casino parent private
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • Chase makes takeover official
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • CityCenter licensing gets own hearing
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Vote paves way for LV-style casinos in Ohio
  • Holiday office parties take hit




  • "I'm not going to say it's going to happen. That's not my prediction. I'm just saying it's conceivable," he said. "In 2007, I would have thought what happened in 2008 was inconceivable, but there it was in black and white. Home values went down 33 percent. I've learned to never say never and I know that anything is conceivable."

    It wasn't long ago that Murphy thought the $200,000 home might become extinct.

    SalesTraq showed the first-quarter resale median price at $140,000, down 16 percent from a year ago. The "worst-case scenario" for new-home median prices by the end of the year would be $150,000, down from the first-quarter median price of $220,000.

    "Before builders drop their price that much, they'll stop building," Murphy said. "I talked to some builders and they told me they don't need any more practice building houses. They already know how to do that."

    Murphy said the recession looks like it will be "wider and deeper" than expected, so he's revising his projection of new-home sales this year to under 5,000, less than half of 2008 new-home sales. The number of subdivisions actively selling new homes has dropped from a high of 585 to about 300, he said.

    Foreclosures will continue to affect home values in Las Vegas, although Murphy noted some inconsistency in the reporting of foreclosure numbers from various sources and confusion over the definition of a foreclosure.

    SalesTraq reported ZIP code 89031 in North Las Vegas as the area with the highest number of foreclosures, 333, in the first quarter, followed by 89110 (239), 89032 (226), 89108 (216) and 89148 (214).

    Murphy found a speck of positive news when he counted a higher number of bank-owned dispositions, or foreclosure sales, than acquisitions in March, an indication that the foreclosure inventory could begin to decline.While median home prices continue to decline, along with price per square foot, overall sales have increased and a greater percentage of real estate-owned, or bank-owned, and short sales under contract seem to be positive indicators for the market, Frank Nason of Residential Resources said.

    "Especially considering the hammering the local economy appears to be taking on jobs," he said.

    Bank-owned properties accounted for about 40 percent of homes on the Multiple Listing Service and 78 percent of closings in March, Nason said. Short-sale properties accounted for 34 percent of listings and 6.9 percent of closings.

    Average sales price for REO homes was $155,206, or $76.63 a square foot, and the median sales price was $139,900, or $77.16 a square foot.

    Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 37 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    johnjasonchun.com wrote on April 28, 2009 11:32 PM: The hot Vegas Market messed up many of my FEMALE friends. They Refied, borrowed, and bought in VEGAS at the top of the market vs. sold everything like I said in 2004 to 2006. They bought with emotion, not math and financial brains. So, now these HOT women are in foreclosure on their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd properties. Me? I sold 198 properties from 2000 to 2007 and my profits are in the 7 figures. These Smart women, hot too, are in ruins. Thier only asset is their looks now... Sad... we no longer talk since I don't like dealing with stress and drama...


    Report abuse

    Mike wrote on April 27, 2009 07:52 PM: Thought you might find this interesting having lived there.

    Mike


    Report abuse

    SoCal wrote on April 27, 2009 12:30 PM: Why would anyone attend this guy's 'Crystal Ball' seminar? He got it totally wrong last year, and the year before that. He said 200k would never be seen again, wrong. Any stock tips for us while you're at it?


    Report abuse

    ixtapa7 wrote on April 27, 2009 08:49 AM: Oh the day's of our lives!


    Report abuse

    3rd worlder wrote on April 27, 2009 04:37 AM: Where was the SEC when realtors without a securities license claimed homeownership was an investment?


    Report abuse

    johnmayer wrote on April 27, 2009 03:00 AM:
    It is estimated that Obama's plan could benefit 8 to 9 million homeowners from the new modification procedures. So how do you know you qualify for the Mortgage Modification? Check the website http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/
    to see if you qualify. I was also in trouble and I am glad I did check it before I talk to my mortgage company and it helped - John Mayer, California


    Report abuse

    Mark wrote on April 26, 2009 03:00 PM: Too much government and unions in Las Vegas. I hope it all burns.


    Report abuse

    Too_many_houses wrote on April 24, 2009 08:10 PM: I just bought a 3 bd / 3.5 ba in Centennial Hills for just over $100k. It originally sold in 2006 for $265k.

    Sounds like you got a fair deal. Pity the poor slob who paid $265K! My crystal ball is no better than yours, but I think within a year similar homes will be selling for $75K.


    Report abuse

    perry wrote on April 24, 2009 05:18 PM: had meeting with my boss he said if thing don't get better in 6 month he will close up the glass shop. and my lender will have another house on there hand because that month payment will go to down payment in a apartment this city is not getting better. i told my co worker we will see a 90,000 dollar house and i believe it. trhis was once a great city/state thank u governor P.O.S


    Report abuse

    Guru wrote on April 24, 2009 05:01 PM: Hermit- you are wrong. What drove housing prices up was the unothodox (non-traditional) financing, or what I call "DRUNK Lending". This caused Demand to far exceed Supply (price boom) and then reality hit (price bust). Without Drunk Lending, there would have been stable growth.

    I have little or no sympathy for those who received piggy-back loans (80/20), 100% financing etc. I only have sympathy for those who received 70-80% LTV mortgage, YET still lost their equity (money). Now, you know why. These responsible, TRADTIONAL Americans have been harmed by Drunk Lending. Essentially, their money was stolen. Oh, and most of them CAN afford their mortgage, and did not pay more than they should have.


    Read All Comments