Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


Housing prices pit builders against banks

Some new homes rival foreclosures in cost, value







Faced with bottom-line competition from foreclosures and short sales, homebuilders in Las Vegas have reduced prices to the point that some are selling for less than $100 a square foot.

The average price of a new KB home at Manchester Park in the master-planned Providence community is $154,200, or about $80 a square foot, housing analyst Larry Murphy of Las Vegas-based SalesTraq said. That compares to the average foreclosure price of $149,746, or $84 a square foot.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle




  • The condition of a typical foreclosed home is probably less than desirable: dead lawn, filthy, trashed, possible structural damage, older neighborhood. The average age of a foreclosed home is 15.7 years, SalesTraq reported.

    It was about 10 years ago that new-home prices in Las Vegas topped $100 a square foot and everybody was squawking about how the market had become more expensive than Phoenix, the most comparable city in the Southwest region.

    The bursting of the housing "bubble" has brought prices back to those levels. Foreclosures, which account for two-thirds of home sales in Las Vegas, continue to put downward pressure on pricing.

    "Foreclosures are definitely a part of the marketplace that we cannot ignore today," said Jeremy Parness, sales agent for Lennar Homes.

    One of the larger homebuilders in Las Vegas with 25 active communities, Lennar reduced prices on 60 homes in its standing inventory.

    "We've got to do what we've got to do. We are very competitively priced with foreclosures," Parness said.

    Perhaps the biggest advantage of buying new is the 10-year warranty, he said. There are also builder incentives such as special financing rates, closing costs and payment protection plans similar to those being offered by automobile manufacturers.

    Payment protection is essentially an insurance policy in which Lennar would pay the monthly mortgage for a period of time in case of job loss, Parness said. Like any insurance policy, there are qualification requirements and the loan must be with the Federal Housing Authority.

    D.R. Horton dropped prices by about 50 percent across the board in January and was the No. 1 homebuilder in Las Vegas for the first quarter with 210 closings, Murphy reported.

    "Apparently, that strategy is working," he said.

    Real estate consultant John Burns said housing affordability is at its best level in 38 years, while the economy is the worst in 50 years.

    A number of factors -- declining prices, low mortgage rates, higher incomes -- have contributed to a 43 percent decline in the monthly cost of homeownership from its peak in this down cycle, he said.

    A household with a median income of $52,800 a year needs to devote 25 percent of income to buy a median-priced single-family home at $164,600. In July 2006, that ratio was 44 percent.

    "Those of us who are in the housing business know that the monthly payment is far more important than the price for entry-level buyers," Burns said. "Entry-level buyers compare the cost of ownership to the cost of renting and have no idea what a Case-Shiller (home price) index means."

    Jim Widner, president of KB Home's local operations, said his company is targeting entry-level buyers and renters with a May 9 seminar about the benefits of homeownership, including an $8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers.

    "People make a big deal that the price of (owning) a home is cheaper than rent," Widner said. "Shouldn't it be? You save to put money down and you make a few sacrifices. Why shouldn't it be cheaper than rent?"

    KB has been able to bring the price of a 2,600-square-foot home at Manchester to $179,900, or about $67 a square foot, Widner said inside one of the model homes. Less demand for materials such as copper and lumber, combined with more available labor, has resulted in substantial savings, he said.

    "You're going to see a return to single-story. You're seeing people get back to what do I need, instead of what can I have," Widner said.

    It's true that a new home comes with a builder warranty, whereas a foreclosure is usually sold "as is" and offers nothing more than a low price, said Tim Kelly Kiernan, foreclosure specialist with Brodkin Group at ReMax Associates.

    Still, value lies in the eyes of the beholder and when it comes down to price -- often the determining factor -- most buyers will go with the bank-owned property, he said.

    "With the REO (real estate-owned) properties being priced so low and dominating the Las Vegas market, it's difficult for a buyer to consider a new home," Kiernan said. "The REOs are winning almost every time."

    Local homebuilders likely benefited from the recent foreclosure moratorium, Steve Hawks of Platinum Real Estate Professionals said.

    "It created an artificial shortage of homes ... and it gave the builders time to retool and price their homes below the banks," he said. "Now there are instances where the banks are competing against the builders, another unintended consequence of an attempt at good intention. The builders are putting more inventory on the market and last I checked, that's not good to soak up vacant homes."

    New-home permit activity has dwindled considerably in Las Vegas. SalesTraq reported 553 permits in the first quarter, down 48 percent from a year ago. Murphy projects fewer than 5,000 new homes will close escrow this year, less than half of the 2008 total.

    A recovery in housing starts must be preceded by a meaningful uptick in sales, followed by a reduction in inventory, said Edward Sullivan, chief economist for Portland Cement Association. Those conditions won't be in place until mid-2010, he said.

    "Increased foreclosures, coupled with deteriorating labor markets and tight credit conditions, will delay significant sales activity until mid-2010," Sullivan said. "Improvements in housing starts are not expected to be significant until 2011."

    Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 22 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Pat wrote on May 05, 2009 09:42 PM: We wanted to buy a REO and Bank owned. Each time we where out bidded. Got sick and tired of it and went to KB HOMES. We bought a brand new house for less then the rent we pay now. We just did not feel like getting into the bidding war.


    carrierpigeon wrote on May 05, 2009 12:24 PM: Pretty lame. I've bought several homes in Dallas, one of the most vibrant economies and one of the most stable real estate markets in the nation and the price per square foot has been between $85 and $100 for years. Of course there is a little fluctuation per neighborhood, but its very very common to purchase very nice homes in the Dallas market 2500 sf for well under $250,000. It will be interestig to see what the square foot costs will end up at when this whole thing has shaken out, say into mid 2012.


    perry wrote on May 02, 2009 08:14 AM: but bush can change the law right but economy was going to good so why change


    LLW wrote on May 01, 2009 04:57 PM: DO YOUR HOMEWORK HOORAY, BUSH DIDNT DO THIS THE LIARS AND CHEATERS OF BUYERS AND BANKS STARTED ALL OF THIS. STOP BLAMMING BUSH AND CHENEY. START BLAMING PEOPLE LIKE BILL CLINTON WHO CHANGED THE LAWS FOR BANK LENDING.


    NativeNevadian wrote on May 01, 2009 04:30 PM: Common Sense:

    Peope were complaining when the builders were building thousands upon thousands of new homes at $200+/Sf. Not so much because of the amount they were charging, but because they WERE OVER BUILDING!!. Just like on the Strip, way too many rooms and not enought people to fill them...just wait till the Ugly Dog(City Yuck Center) on the strip opens to dilute all of the rooms (profits) on the strip.

    There are not enough people with jobs and $$ to live in all these houses. And if you are foolish enough to think the situation is going to change in the next couple of years, I got a bridge to nowhere to sell you.


    Hooray for our current President wrote on May 01, 2009 04:27 PM: Bush and Cheney ruined the housing market just like they ruined this country the past 8 years

    They were not leaders, they were circus clowns


    hermit wrote on May 01, 2009 03:09 PM: Selling new house like this for that price just brought down the value of all your homes.


    Justice wrote on May 01, 2009 02:16 PM: Ever hear of supply & demand. It is a simple concept that explains most price models.


    Common Sense wrote on May 01, 2009 01:55 PM: To the first question: flippers are just the ultimate example of real estate industry middlemen. Like all middlemen, they distort prices.

    To the second: I am neither a builder nor the friend of any builders. If I were a builder, I wouldn't have time top post opinions here in the middle of the day.

    My point is that the housing bubble would have happened whether builders were charging $200/sf or $80/sf. Buyers were in a frenzy in 2003-2004. They would have paid any price for a house.

    The only question is who would have made the profit from those house prices. If builders were somehow required to charge no more than $100/sf for houses, then insiders would have snapped them up and re-sold them for $200/sf.

    The builders would have built the same house. The same buyers would have ended up with them. But someone OTHER than the builders would have made all the profit.

    The people complaining now that builders are "destroying" home prices were conspicuously silent when those same builders were boosting the price of the complainers' homes by charging $200/sf.

    Can't have it both ways.

    If fools weren't willing to pay $200/sf, then builders could not possibly have sold homes for that price. Blame the fools, not the honest, productive people who happened to benefit from other people's idiocy.


    pffft! wrote on May 01, 2009 01:11 PM: Pffft! If nobody took a subprime loan, there would be NO SUBPRIME LOAN MARKET.


    Read All Comments