Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Business

Tuesday
Mar 16, 2010
Mostly Clear
Mostly Clear 63° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Business


Bankruptcy judge shifts Liberty Realty to Chapter 7

Agents seek thousands in commissions

Bankruptcy Court Judge Bruce Markell denied a motion Tuesday to dismiss Liberty Realty's Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization filing, pleasing several real estate agents who told the judge about unpaid commission amounts of up to $114,000.

Markell said he would convert the bankruptcy case to Chapter 7 liquidation and appoint a U.S. Trustee to distribute any assets.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Hard Rock cuts loss by 34 percent
  2. 7-Eleven seeks sites for LV expansion
  3. Pinnacle Entertainment names Anthony Sanfilippo as CEO
  4. Nevada part of appliance rebate plan
  5. Macau may take back land promised to casino operators
  6. New Yorker to take reins of Las Vegas chamber
  7. Theater-going growing, movie executive says



Attorney Edward McDonald with the Office of U.S. Trustee opposed the motion of dismissal and requested the Chapter 7 conversion. He said Liberty appears to have cash on hand from accounts receivable. Also, no monthly operating report was filed for March, even though it was due two weeks ago.

Liberty Realty was acquired last week by Century 21 Aadvantage Gold, a surprise to the judge and to some attorneys in the courtroom, leaving agents with unsigned commission checks that couldn't be cashed. Some agents estimate the figure at $250,000.

Former Liberty agent Juan Gutierrez said he's owed $7,500 and thanked the judge for not dismissing the case.

"I'm behind on my house payment," he said. "I want my money paid. A lot of agents are in my position. We just barely started (selling) again."

Berit Bogdanoff told the judge she's owed $92,000. She has personally sued Liberty Realty owner and broker, Richard Bell. Another agent said Liberty owes him $114,000 in commissions.

If Liberty was sold to Century 21, it was certainly not done with court approval, Markell said.

The Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee, when appointed, would pursue any assets that may be recovered and available for distribution, he said. The judge encouraged agents to fill out paperwork with the court to be notified of any further proceedings.

Christopher Burke, attorney for Liberty Realty, said a plan of reorganization had not been filed because it is not believed the debtors can perform under such a plan at this time or get the plan confirmed. Liberty lost more than one-fourth of the 1,116 agents it had before filing bankruptcy in September and continued to lose about 25 agents a week until closing.

The brokerage downsized to two offices in Reno and Las Vegas. Liberty's Las Vegas office on Durango Drive is in a building once owned by Silver State Bank, which is now under receivership by the FDIC. One foreclosure sale of the building has already been postponed.

Conversion to Chapter 7 will not benefit creditors as any assets are negligible, Burke said. Liberty's offices and most of its equipment are leased and any remaining desks and chairs have little value.

Markell couldn't say whose rights have been lost and whose rights have been preserved.

"I wouldn't treat the money as a Rembrandt painting that once it's stolen it can never be recovered," the judge said. "Money is money. It's always there. I recommend contacting the trustee and telling him what to be looking for."

Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 16 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Smart Agent wrote on June 26, 2009 01:00 PM: Great debate, but I can only share this quote with you folks that says it all!

“There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper and the people who consider price only are this man’s lawful prey. It’s unwise to pay too much, but it’s worse to pay too little. When you pay too much, you lose a little money – that is all. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do. The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot – it can’t be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run. And if you do that, you will have enough to pay for something better.”

-John Ruskin 1819-1900 Art Critic & Social Thinker

Not much has changed in this arena since way back then!


Report abuse

Fair Broker wrote on June 26, 2009 12:54 PM: Oh, and I never said they were "Lazy" at all. Just "greedy" and/or "naive" and bought into what the snake oil salesman was selling. Many of them are great people and agents and I hate to see them hurt like this. But in life and real estate we all must learn our lessons and realize that just as a seller generally loses with discount companies in the short and long run, agents lose when they do the same. Believing that you are only worth 100% is like a seller believing that you should only charge them 1% because they think you only put a sign up and mls. C'mon.


Report abuse

Fair Broker wrote on June 26, 2009 12:44 PM: "Do the Math"..That's an interesting statement considering that it is clear you have never owned or ran a mid sized or large company before.No doubt, if he had 2000 agents that he was profitable, but not by the amount you think.How many agents didn't close anything?How many agents didn't pay?What were his expenses?I imagine they had to run over $100k per month easily.Now deduct taxes. And frankly he never had that many agents for any extended period. So that model barely works in the hottest of markets, but the second the market turns it fails. That is the crux that many agents don't understand. Those big years need to be really big to pay for those bad years, and the skinny deals just don't work in the really bad years. That's why the traditional brokers dominate in down times and good times consistently.Next,who told you that you got 100% anyway?What do you call those fees and expenses?How much did you really keep anyway?How about lost business because you lacked reputation or brand?Unless you're a giant producer you're fooling yourself.Next you are underestimating the value of a good broker.You clearly would benefit from good leadership if you are showing 90 homes and the buyers leave you.I'd leave you too.And if they are cutting your commission what do you expect?You see no value in your broker,so your clients see little or no value in you.It trickles down.And I'm no friend of the family..Just an old guy who's seen these companies come and go.The future is NOT 100% shops,it's actually lower splits and fewer agents with bigger companies who can outspend,market,and perform for the customer.Brokers with no money can't compete,and Realtors with newspaper ads can't either.It's capitalism, and the customer wins with big strong capitalized firms w/great agents.


Report abuse

Do the Math wrote on June 25, 2009 03:55 PM: I don't believe for one second that Liberty Agents were lazy. I for one worked hard for my 100%.

I have gone to another 100% agency and believe it is the way that all agencies will go in the future.

Why should I have to pay a 6% fee and a 2% fee and some other fee per transaction. I do my own advertising and find my own buyers and sellers. I chose to pay myself the BS fees.

Richard did not plan too well for the future and it was he who did wrong by his agents and screwed things up, NOT his agents. We put money in his pocket not the other way around. With out his agents he would not have lasted as long as he did.

At the height of 2004 I was told he had 2000+ agents. That's $200,000 per month in revenue coming in to his business. I was also told that Liberty agents closed at least 100+ deals per month. That's another $50,000 for Richard. So a cool 3 million bucks per year as a minimum coming in. Yes he had over heads and had to pay his brokers etc.

Come on, if you can not live off 1 million + bucks per year your doing something wrong.

To the person below who thinks we suckled on Liberty's teat.....I bet you are not a realtor who gets to put buyers in your car for free and drive them to 40-90 homes only to find out that they went with a new home builder. Or your not a realtor who went that extra mile to help a buyer or seller close on a home by gaving them some of your commission to make the deal fly (thru escrow)....

You must be a friend of the family....


Report abuse

Smart Agent wrote on June 24, 2009 04:54 PM: Well said! I've been an agent with a large National firm for 15 years and have seen agents leave for the pie in the sky deals with these fly by nights. They act like these brokers are Santa Claus for giving them such high splits and low fees and almost look smug at us who stay behind and just focus on selling homes and doing a great service to our customers like we're stupid for not taking those dream deals. Now what? My commission checks have never been late, always cash and my broker pays his bills. He also donates money to charities and helps people. Why do you all fall for this stuff? Just do the math people and stop whining about your checks bouncing. You signed up for this when you chose the cheapest instead of the best! Now you are in court battles to get your money. I just cashed my $8700 commission check today on my lower split and I am relieved I never fell for their pitches! I can't even imagine getting a bad check or an unsigned check from my broker. Ouch!


Report abuse

Fair Broker wrote on June 24, 2009 11:29 AM: Realtors, I've been preaching this story for years, even to some of you who have been left without checks. You joined that company out of your belief that the broker doesn't deserve to make money. You ground fair brokers down to nothing and then went to Liberty or other companies like them to "get more money". It's called "greed". It was never about what was best for the customer, just what you could put in your pocket and keep from the broker. Richard Bell was selling you nothing but a high split and you fell for it. Yet you drive a BMW because you don't want a VW, you pay for quality with your car but not with your career.Now you're upset that you drove him out of business with your greed? You're surprised that he couldn't get by on the pittens that you paid him when the market tanked? Richard offered you all the opportunity to grind the traditional brokers down and lured you away from them with $$. He gets what he asked for and frankly so do all of you who let greed overtake your common sense. The bottom line is this, if you let your broker make a little money, they will be there for you for years to come and support you. Take this as a lesson learned and don't fall for "caps,low fees,cheap e&o,huge splits,big promises,etc". If it's too good to be true, then it is! Hopefully you all learned from this expensive experience and do what's right for the customer! Get with a good solid firm and create a fair relationship that will last for years! You never cared about RB so why should he care about you? Now everyone loses! Good luck.


Report abuse

bigtime wrote on June 01, 2009 08:01 PM: The owner of liberty realty has been stealing commission checks from his agents for years now!! by him closing the doors and stealing a handful of checks is his last stand! Liberty agents have worked by the lowest ethical standards in the industry for years!
They are the number 1 complained about brokerage in the valley! The majority of there agents are dirty!! its not a new story that the owner has burned Realtors out of paychecks,, old news.


Report abuse

Shut Up Whiners wrote on May 28, 2009 10:30 AM: You suckled at Liberty's teat. Richard Bell took less of your commission money than the other brokers in town. You were happy to ride the train, and now that there is a wreck you are righteously indignant? Hypocrites I tell you. 3% for what? Paper checking? Robbers all.


Report abuse

Bill wrote on May 11, 2009 06:26 PM: Your $100 my friend is long gone and probably spent on fine wine and rich men's toys.

So the only way to get your $100 back is to relish in the joy of knowing that Richard Bell is going to have to sell all of his toys and trinkets and his name in this town is S#^@t.

Hey as a bonus Bell might end up in Prison for writing bad checks......

Don't drop the soap Richard


Report abuse

X Liberty Agent wrote on May 09, 2009 12:49 PM: According to the memo that was distributed to the agents, this was a conversion not an acquisition. Which is it? The owner of Century 21 said he would NOT be honoring those uncashed/uncashable checks and acted as though he didn't know anything about them, in fact saying this is unethical if in fact this is what Richard Bell had done. They never told the agents they were filing for bankruptcy either; we found out by a memo about checks written on the wrong account. That would have been the time to go and find another broker. I started having my checks go to another broker out of state where I am also licensed. Oh, well, it was good when it was good and we had offices all over town to use and got all of our money for $100/month and $500/transaction. Another "brothel" closed...just kidding. ;)


Read All Comments