Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


Online betting gains backer

Harrah's, others support new bill

Casino giant Harrah's Entertainment has thrown its support behind legislation introduced Wednesday that would allow Internet gambling by individuals in the United States, something that could open a whole new market for the owner of the World Series of Poker brand.

The proposed Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act of 2009, which was introduced Wednesday by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., would establish a framework to permit licensed gambling operators to accept wagers from inside the United States.


Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • INSIDE GAMING: Missouri outburst hurts Lee, Pinnacle




  • The legislation provides safeguards against compulsive and underage gambling, money laundering, fraud and identity theft.

    "We really believe this industry already exists," said Jan Jones, Harrah's Entertainment's senior vice president of communications and government relations. "It just exists in a Wild West setting. If you say you care about protecting children and fraud and money laundering, then the only way you can put those protections in place is to put in a strong regulatory frame."

    The casino company spent $405,087 in the first quarter and registered as a lobbyist to try to build support for the new proposal.

    Harrah's Entertainment has also hired Tony Podesta, a longtime Democratic fundraiser who has lobbied for Wal-Mart and Sallie Mae, and his brother John Podesta, an adviser to President Barack Obama.

    Jones said Americans are already spending $6 billion annually gambling in an unregulated online environment.

    The bill would establish regulations that would be enforced by the U.S. Treasury Department. The federal department would also issue licenses to Internet gambling operators.

    Frank's bill was co-sponsored by Rep. Shelley Berkley, D.-Nev., whose district includes Clark County.

    It would repeal the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, which made it a crime for banks or other institutions to process financial transactions used to place illegal bets online.

    The Bush administration implemented regulations, which are set to take effect Dec. 1, to enforce the banking ban.

    Separate legislation introduced by Frank on Wednesday would delay those regulations from taking effect.

    "What we have now is an unworkable law passed by those opposed to all gaming, whether it's done by adults in Las Vegas or on the Internet," Berkley said in a statement. "So there is no question we must act to correct the problems caused by this failed crusade to ban Internet gaming."

    Similar legislation failed in the last Congress.

    MGM Mirage expressed support for the idea of legalizing, regulating and taxing Internet gambling, but cautioned that company executives have not read Frank's new bill to know whether it is the right one to support.

    Alan Feldman, MGM Mirage's senior vice president of public affairs, called the 2006 law bad legislation that was passed without any hearings.

    "The original ban was absolutely ridiculous, just absurd," Feldman said.

    Youbet.com and the Poker Players Alliance, which is headed by former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato, R-N.Y., are also lobbying for the legalization of online gambling.

    Not every supporter of online gaming expressed blanket support for the new bill.

    David G. Schwartz, director of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas' Gaming Research Center, expressed concern about having the federal government oversee the industry. He said the new proposal would basically set up what he described as a federal Gaming Control Board.

    "It would have the federal government regulating gambling, which goes against 220 years of how we've interpreted the Constitution, which is that states have the right to regulate gaming," Schwartz said. "This seems to foist an overly complicated bureaucracy on the gaming industry."

    Jones said Harrah's supports a federal oversight role because regulating online gambling at the state level would be nearly impossible.

    "The whole nature of Internet gaming is that people can be on all over the world," Jones said. "It makes much more sense to have a federal regulatory oversight, with an opt-out by the states, which this bill provides."

    Contact reporter Arnold M. Knightly at aknightly@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893. Bloomberg News contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Ken wrote on May 07, 2009 01:02 PM: Harrah's is merely paying their 'admission' price into the process.

    Since Barney Frank became involved with this issue, it has been about banking and control; not about the rights of online poker players.

    After all is said and done, the government is going to license online operations (read: Harrah's) and the money will have to funnel through American banks (read: Obama's BofA).

    Say goodbye to FullTilt. Harrah's is not lobbying this hard to allow Americans to play poker online at PokerStars. They want the concession and will get it. The government will get their taxes right off the top and the American online player will have to abide by Harrah's rules.

    And we all know how friendly Harrah's is to poker players in their casinos. What could go wrong? LOL


    Free Nevada wrote on May 07, 2009 05:39 AM: > The proposed Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act of 2009, which was introduced Wednesday by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., would establish a framework to permit licensed gambling operators to accept wagers from inside the United States.

    Barney Frank reportedly was romantically involved with a male executive at Fannie Mae for about seven years while presiding over the committee that oversaw Fannie Mae. The two broke up just months after the executive, who was also responsible for helping Fannie Mae design many of their mortgage programs, left the company. During the Clinton years, Frank pushed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into taking on more risk and reportedly opposed giving the Bush administration the right to approve or disapprove business activities that “could pose risk to the taxpayers.” Even as Fannie and Freddie faltered, Frank was in denial which many believe directly led to the collapse of the world economy. 17 trillion (!) US dollars of spending and pledges later, we're not half-way recovered, we're staring down an "Alt A" foreclosure crisis that is projected to be much more severe than the subprime debacle of the prior two years, Las Vegas has serious "fundamental" (viability) problems and just last week, the CFO of Fannie Mae killed himself.

    Now Frank wants to legalize online gambling which, like tribal gaming, vacuums the cash out of the economy (no job/infrastructure creation), creates junkies all across America and marginalizes Las Vegas! That the "good" people at Harrahs who seem to specialize in making junkies out of lonely seniors and desperate poor people is not surprising. But without Harrahs' lobbying efforts, do you think Frank would still be able to get something like this to pass even among his fellow Democrats?

    > The casino company spent $405,087