Quantcast
MobileRJ | RSS TwitterTwitter FacebookFacebook E-mail Alerts
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
Business
Jun. 12, 2009
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Building halted, resort secured

Fontainebleau on hold while project in court

By ARNOLD M. KNIGHTLY and TONY ILLIA
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL

Fontainebleau developers are securing the site because of vandalism and theft concerns.
Photo by Gary Thompson.

Construction on the Fontainebleau Las Vegas has been halted and the 24-acre site is being secured while the project is in bankruptcy court, a project spokesman confirmed Thursday.

"There is a fairly significant contingent of security at the site now," Fontainebleau spokesman Lance Ignon said. "But the question is how far you want to wrap the physical structure? We want to determine if some very near-term events in court may preclude the need to wrap it entirely and allow us to resume construction."

Most Popular Stories
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy
  • Airport suffers another decline




    • Fontainebleau Las Vegas' attorneys late Wednesday filed a motion seeking an expedited hearing on its lawsuit against a group of lenders. Fontainebleau is asking that the banks release $656 million in funds immediately so construction on the Strip project can resume.

    A bankruptcy court scheduled a hearing Wednesday to set a date to hear the motion.

    Fontainebleau wants the court to order the banks, led by Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, to provide the funding they pulled in early March.

    "Prompt adjudication of this motion will assist in the ultimate disposition of this case by establishing the revolver banks' breach and plaintiff's right to hundreds of millions of dollars in additional cash collateral," Fontainebleau Las Vegas lawyers wrote in their motion. "Indeed, a favorable resolution of this litigation is the only means by which to obtain funding to complete construction of the project."

    The lack of funding led to Tuesday's bankruptcy filing by Fontainebleau Las Vegas and two affiliates seeking Chapter 11 protection in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Southern District of Florida in Miami.

    Fontainebleau Resorts, the project's developer, in April originally filed a $3 billion lawsuit against the banks in Clark County District Court, but moved the lawsuit to the Florida bankruptcy court when it filed Tuesday night.

    "This lawsuit is an important and valuable asset of Fontainebleau Las Vegas' bankruptcy estate and its resolution is essential to a resumption of construction and a successful reorganization," David Friedman, an attorney for Fontainebleau Las Vegas, said in a statement Wednesday.

    The project's developer made a decision early last week to "button the project up" while Fontainebleau executives were preparing for a possible bankruptcy, people familiar with the situation said.

    The 63-story, 3,815-room development was 70 percent complete when work was slowed in late April after the banks pulled their funding.

    Nearly 3,000 construction workers were laid off in late April, but approximately 250 workers stayed on the job through the bankruptcy filing.

    The subcontractors are owed more than $250 million dating back 21/2 months, according to one project official who asked to remain anonymous.

    "People continue to work on a good faith basis," the official said. "If they had some place else to go, they would be gone."

    The developers are securing the project site because of concerns about theft of construction and furnishing materials and vandalism of some of the rooms on the lower floors that have been fully furnished.

    Open areas of the project, such as areas where windows haven't been installed, will need to be covered.

    "I think they are just trying to waterproof it, and make sure all the doors are in," Marc Furman, administrative assistant for the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, said. "It won't be a long-term protection. They just want to protect the asset, but for a much shorter period of time than say, Echelon."

    Boyd Gaming Corp. halted work on the $4.8 billion Echelon project in August, 14 months after breaking ground. The project had $500 million of work completed and three of the five proposed hotel towers were up to the eighth floor of concrete and steel construction.

    Boyd has been paying for round-the-clock security to guard the site, which still has cranes and other heavy equipment on the site, against theft and vandalism.

    "(Fontainebleau) is a much more fragile asset," Furman said. "There is a lot of stuff already in the building, and you need to protect it so it doesn't get damaged, and make sure the security is there."

    The Fontainebleau Las Vegas is 737 feet tall with 3.4 million square feet. Along with the rooms, the site includes a 100,000-square-foot casino, a 60,000-square-foot spa and a 3,200-seat performing arts center, nearly 300,000 square feet of retail space, 390,000 square feet of conference area and meeting rooms, and 27 restaurants, nightclubs and bars.

    Contact reporter Arnold M. Knightly at aknightly@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 12 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Todd wrote on June 13, 2009 07:51 AM: The End, you are an idiot.


    The End wrote on June 12, 2009 04:39 PM: I like Ken's idea, sounds way too fun!

    Brian Fleming, good luck with your believing, the last dozen years were fun, now the town is done. It has gotten to the point that one knows more people who have left Vegas than live in Vegas. The town is not fun anymore, in fact this place is downright depressing now. I gotta take a trip to Detroit, see which town is winning the race to the bottom.


    Jerry wrote on June 12, 2009 02:39 PM: It just go to show you that you can not trust a Bank. They do not have to honer a contracts, like the rest of us have to.


    Brian Fleming wrote on June 12, 2009 12:39 PM: I don't believe, for a minute, that things are so bad in Las Vegas that the Fontainebleau needs more than regular security to secure the site while they go through bankruptcy proceedings. I'm a New Yorker, who's buying in Vegas, and I still believe this is one of the greatest cities in America.


    Banker wrote on June 12, 2009 12:15 PM: The bank is better off to stop funding and force a foreclosure. This allows them to gain ownership of the property and wipe-out the subordinate debt and equity. The debt on the project will only be that of the bank, which can then sell-off the property at a reduced cost to some international buyer. In contrast, if the bank fully funded the project their break-even point just goes higher. The bank is doing the smart thing.


    AmIBlue wrote on June 12, 2009 10:42 AM: Attention Las Vegas! Bank of America is now taking suggestions, to start earning their $2 billion back. Mine: Finish at least a corner of the ground floor of this monstrous hulk and put in a transvestite strip club (you know, the one that Neonopolis rejected) and call it Chaz Bono's.


    BottomFisher wrote on June 12, 2009 09:26 AM: What starts in Vegas........Stops in Vegas


    Ken wrote on June 12, 2009 07:55 AM: Let people run amok in the building a la Die Hard and give them paintball guns.

    That would be so freaking sweet.


    Frank M. Pelteson wrote on June 12, 2009 07:40 AM: These behemoths, like Fontainebleau Las Vegas and Echelon will stand baking in the sun here in the desert for an indeterminate length of time.

    Come on out to Las Vegas to view these still-born buildings, so you can laugh your head off with the humor engendered by these abortive projects. You wouldn't even have to go to a humor show here, being amused for free at these gross sights instead.

    It reminds me of the sudden collapse of the Defense Industry at the termination of World War II. North American Aviation did not even warn the workers of its closure in Dallas, TX. Monday Morning after the weekend closure, the parking lots were locked, creating the world's biggest traffic jam as the unnotified workers milled around the closed parking lots in their cars. When NAA CEO Dutch Kindelberger received the wire for contract cancellation from the War Department, he ran down the hall so fast to stop the plant operation, that he stumbled and fell. The delay of that fall cost him millions of dollars in cash flow, I remember hearing from an NAA employee who went through that disaster in Dallas.


    John wrote on June 12, 2009 07:24 AM: Well that was smart of the bank to not finish funding the project... How do they expect to be repaid anything if the hotel can't open? People wonder why we are in the mess we are in because the banks are stupid.


    Read All Comments