Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Business


Banks say Strip resort faces huge liabilities

The $656 million that Fontainebleau Las Vegas wants a group of banks to release won't be anywhere near enough to complete the project, the banks argue in motions filed with the bankruptcy court in Florida.

The banks, which are being sued by Fontainebleau Las Vegas for backing out of a loan agreement, also believe the Strip resort's debt levels would far exceed its market value if it opens next year.


Most Popular Stories
  • REAL ESTATE: Housing analyst predicts increase in sales, median price in the coming year
  • REAL ESTATE: Housing analyst predicts increase in sales, median price in the coming year
  • SOUTHERN NEVADA ECONOMY: Survey says recession's worst has passed for Las Vegas
  • SOUTHERN NEVADA ECONOMY: Holding off on hiring
  • Blue Heron remains aloft with custom features
  • Rental housing prices down 8.2 percent in Las Vegas
  • Rental housing prices down 8.2 percent in Las Vegas
  • UFC investment won't be used to help bail out Station Casinos, owners say
  • UFC investment won't be used to help bail out Station Casinos, owners say
  • Penn National maintains interest in Strip property
  • Penn National maintains interest in Strip property
  • INSIDE GAMING: 'Total nonsense' makes a lot of sense
  • Harrah's gets preliminary approval to acquire Planet Hollywood
  • Harrah's gets preliminary approval to acquire Planet Hollywood
  • MGM to divest from Atlantic City




  • The developer told its lenders in April that it would cost nearly $1.5 billion to complete the project, according to a court declaration filed in bankruptcy court by Henry Yu, senior vice president of Bank of America.

    The project already carries nearly $1.7 billion in debt, which would push the project's debt to $3.2 billion upon opening, Yu said.

    "It is clear that the project at completion will have liabilities far exceeding its assets" unless the $1.7 billion in existing debt is "compromised," Yu said in the filing.

    The banks' arguments will be at issue Monday when Bankruptcy Judge A. Jay Cristol considers Fontainebleau Las Vegas developer's request for a summary judgment against the banks.

    The developer sued a group of banks and is asking the court to order them to release the $656 million so work on the project can be restarted.

    Construction on the Strip resort was stopped after the developers' filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy because of the banks' decision to withhold the money.

    The banks have said the money was withheld because of concerns the project was in default and having cost overruns.

    Fontainebleau Las Vegas' developer has insisted there was no default, and even if there was, that the banks were obligated to provide the committed financing.

    "The banks improperly terminated their contractual obligation to lend the money for this project," Fontainebleau said in a statement Thursday. "Nothing they say -- all of which is distorted and wrong -- relieves them of that obligation."

    Fontainebleau, which is owned by Miami-based developer Jeffrey Soffer, has said a third party is ready to finance the rest of the project if the banks release the money.

    Although that party has not been named, sources say private equity firm Apollo Management could be Fontainebleau's white knight.

    Apollo, which co-owns Harrah's Entertainment, completed raising $14.8 billion for its latest investment fund, Apollo Investment Fund VII, in January.

    An attorney for the fund has attended some of the Miami court hearings, and the firm has been buying up some of the project's debt at a discount, two sources have said.

    The Review-Journal reported June 20 that representatives from Harrah's and Apollo toured the project, which is 70 percent complete.

    People familiar with the situation said that if Apollo were to acquire the project, it would be owned separately from Harrah's, although the casino giant would manage and operate the property.

    The banks are arguing the developers knew they wouldn't be able to meet their financial commitments months before they requested the $656 million.

    Fontainebleau officials told the lenders in April, Yu said, the maximum debt that the project could manage with projected cash flow is $1.4 billion.

    The company tried to persuade the holders of a $675 million mortgage note to "extinguish" it and convert a portion of the credit facilities to equity.

    "This again confirms the project had been insolvent well before Fontainebleau filed for bankruptcy protection on June 9," Yu said.

    Contact reporter Arnold M. Knightly at aknightly@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893.

    Reporter Tony Illia contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Hope wrote on July 12, 2009 02:07 AM: Having funds to invest has absolutely nothing to do with laying off employees. Staffing levels are normally based upon customer count. If business is down, then why keep as many employees. Not brain surgery by any means. Those laid off employees should be happy, as they possibly might be first in line to be hired.


    In The LV wrote on July 11, 2009 02:14 AM: Isn't Harrah's the same casino that had to lay off thousands of employees because of the bad economy?

    This is a slap in the face of those laid off, the utter notion that they could invest and take over this project. Laid off and existing workers of Harrah's should be insulted and outraged.