Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
Business


FORMER SENATOR BATTLES BET BAN

D'Amato lobbying to allow Internet gambling

WASHINGTON -- It wasn't difficult for former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato to decide last month to lobby for the Poker Players Alliance as it seeks to repeal an Internet gambling ban.

"I've known some of the people at PPA and some, I actually played with. They knew of my enthusiasm for the game," D'Amato said in a phone interview from New York City.


Most Popular Stories
  • Expect to pay at Nugget's new tower
  • Fraud with Portent
  • Debt-ridden casino operators told to expect pressure
  • REAL ESTATE: Las Vegas home prices stabilize as threat of foreclosure flood wanes
  • REAL ESTATE: Short sales on the rise
  • GAMING COMPANY EARNINGS: Station drops $455.4 million
  • THE STRIP: License approved for Aria
  • GLOBAL GAMING EXPO: Recession over? Don't bet on it
  • Foreclosure wave continues
  • Union wants insiders to help pull Station from bankruptcy




  • During D'Amato's 18 years in the Senate, the New York Republican was known for having Thursday night poker games in his Capitol Hill office, and he still plays weekly.

    After the House returns from a two-week recess on April 17, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, is expected to introduce legislation to repeal an Internet gambling ban approved by Congress last year.

    Reps. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., and Jon Porter, R-Nev., also plan to unveil a bill calling for an 18-month study of Internet gambling by the National Academy of Sciences.

    D'Amato, 69, said he is working with Frank and the Nevadans, but it still isn't clear how many bills will be introduced or when.

    "We are not going to get into the pride of authorship," D'Amato said. "We're just working to produce legislative remedies."

    Poker players are being discriminated against by the ban, which does not prohibit state lotteries, fantasy sports or horse racing bets, D'Amato said. He describes the ban as an "unreasonable constraint" on the rights of individuals to use the Internet.

    "Are we saying you have a right to own a gun in your own house, but you can't use your computer to play poker on the Internet? It's ridiculous," D'Amato said.

    The ban makes it a crime to use credit cards or online financial devices to pay for casino games and sports betting on the Internet.

    Even though former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., had to attach the ban to a port security bill in the waning days of Congress last year to get it passed. Repealing it will not be easy.

    Roll call votes to ban Internet gambling were 317-93 in the House last July and 90-10 in the Senate eight years earlier.

    The National Football League strongly supports the ban, and NFL Executive Vice President Joe Browne said Internet gambling is contrary to federal and state statutes.

    "The spirit of Congress, going back for decades, has always been against gambling on college and professional sports," Browne said.

    As for D'Amato, Browne said, "he has always been a good spokesman for whatever cause he represents and he has been on the opposite side of professional sports on several occasions."

    D'Amato said Congress may have no choice but to consider a repeal after the World Trade Organization last week declared the ban illegal.

    The WTO ruled in favor of Antigua and Barbuda, a Caribbean nation that defied U.S. efforts to outlaw the $12 billion Internet gambling industry. "I think, in the fullness of time, this (WTO decision) may be one of the linchpins in bringing about a change in the law," D'Amato said.

    After returning from a recent trip to the Isle of Man, which is located near Britain and allows Internet gambling, D'Amato said he is convinced online wagering can be effectively regulated.

    Asked if Internet gambling should be regulated and taxed, D'Amato said, "Absolutely."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Dean Bausman wrote on April 24, 2007 03:04 AM: My response to these shysters in India trying to take more of my money. I wonder how much the former Senator is getting paid to lobby for these crooks. If it is legalized in the U.S. make it U.S. Casinos only.

    Hello,

    You people got some big ones. After 17 attempts I still don't have the measely $50.00 I had on my account when the poker ban went into effect and no one will return my emails. Now you are wanting me to ask my representatives to allow you to be a legitament business in the United States and you want me to pay for a subscription. What do you take me for??? Tell you what, this email and this response is going to the 310 email addresses I have between my 4 email addresses. I let the people in my network know about my $50.00 not being returned I think around the 5th or 6th time I attempted to reclaim my account. Out of those I would say about 40 of them are poker players some of which I originaly refered to your casino. $50.00, I still can't beleive your casino which comes highly recommended in several poker books and magazines would not return my money and then won't return email nor have a good phone number. I am really glad it was only $50.00. I still play online on the free games but will not play a online casino game for money.

    Regards,

    Dean Bausman


    Christine Adams wrote on April 13, 2007 07:34 PM: i don't believe our tax dollars are best spent debateing internet gambling, I do believe homelessniss, medical health coverage, the war, and a lot of other situations in our states warrent more consideration. DON'T YOU? OR ARE YOU SO OUT OF TUNE? tHERE ARE SOME MANY OTHER ISSUES THAT CAN USE YOUR ATTENTION THAN THIS PORK BARREL ISSUE/ MAKE A STAND DO WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT. PAY ATTENTION. DO YIOU THINK WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT INTERNET GAMBLINE WHEN OUR CHILDREN ARE DIYING IN IRAG? OR OUR CHILDREN HAVE PEDIPHILS IN THERE MIDST? DO YOU THINK WE JUSTIFY YOUR PRESENSE? DO YOU REALLY THINK THINK THIS COUNTRY HAS ANY AND I MEAN ANY CONFIDENCE IN THIER, THAT BEING AN OXIX MORON, OFFICALS.


    Tony wrote on April 07, 2007 03:16 AM: We need to see more articles like this, as internet wagering is a multibillion dollar industry. This industry can have a huge effect on our economy if regulated. Thankyou for this article.