Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
Business


Frank says Net bet ban resistance growing

WASHINGTON -- Although there may not be much support in Congress for Internet gambling, Rep. Barney Frank says resistance is growing against a ban passed late last year.

"I think a lot of members of Congress voted for that (ban) without having given it a lot of attention," Frank said Wednesday. "And I think that there is growing opposition to it," he said. "I think that this may be a case where, after the fact of having voted for it, people don't like it and they reconsider."


Most Popular Stories
  • Buyout to take casino parent private
  • Chase makes takeover official
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • CityCenter licensing gets own hearing
  • INSIDE GAMING: Echelon could use some tarp assistance
  • Vote paves way for LV-style casinos in Ohio
  • World Series of Poker Main Event - The Final Table
  • Agency closes alterers of loans




  • Frank, the new chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said he plans to introduce a bill "probably next week, maybe the week after" against the Internet gambling ban.

    Democrat Shelley Berkley and Republican Jon Porter, both of Nevada, also are planning to unveil legislation within the next two weeks that would call for a study of Internet gambling by the National Academy of Sciences.

    After considering an 18-month study, the Nevadans are expected to propose a one-year study instead.

    The Poker Players Alliance, represented by former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato, R-N.Y., also may seek legislation that would exempt online poker from the ban.

    Frank said he may support the Nevadans' bill, but "I want to go beyond the study."

    Although he said it would be "premature" to discuss details of his bill, Frank explained why he has described the Internet gambling ban as one of the "stupidest" ever passed.

    "Because I like to tell the truth," he said. "It has no valid public purpose in my judgment. It intrudes in people's private lives.

    "One argument for it ... was this activity adds nothing to the GDP (gross domestic product). That's a chilling principle; that if something doesn't add to the gross domestic product we can ban it. That's a kind of ... corporatism that is very troubling to me."

    The ban prohibits the use of credit cards or other bank instruments to pay for sports bets and gambling online. Before the ban, Internet gambling had become a $12 billion industry with more than 2,300 Web sites.

    Congress passed the ban after it was attached to a port security bill by then-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn. The vote was 409-2, and previous roll call votes in the House and Senate have shown overwhelming support for an Internet gambling ban.

    Frank acknowledged Congress may not be ready to change the ban dramatically.

    "But I know (lawmakers) are hearing from people who don't like it now. So I'd say the situation is very fluid," Frank said.

    Throughout his career, Frank has been a persistent and often lonely voice against efforts to regulate gambling.

    "In a number of areas, I am a libertarian," Frank said. "I think that John Stuart Mill's 'On Liberty' is a great statement, and I was just rereading it. I believe that people should be allowed to read and gamble and ride motorcycles and do a lot of things that other people might not want to let them do."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    John Q wrote on August 12, 2008 03:32 PM: Gambling is not without it's problems, some people cannot exercise enough self control to know when to stop. However, it is not up to the government to exercise self control for it's people.

    I especially appreciate that Rep. Frank views people's personal lives as personal and their own. It is refreshing to see our representatives actually represent what we care about. Maybe we are finally past the post 9/11 brain drain when any bill that mentioned "terrorism" got passed without a cursory review or understanding of how it impacted our civil liberties and constitutional rights.

    Let's keep the pressue on our representatives to actually represent our interests!


    Report abuse

    Brooke wrote on April 20, 2007 10:40 PM: There is strength in numbers and "We can win this" if we all stick together .

    Brooke in "Las Vegas"


    Report abuse

    stuart from cincinnati wrote on April 20, 2007 10:39 AM: right on barney !!!!!! get the government out of our lives not resticting what we do in the privacy of our home or office.
    playing poker online never killed anyone, did it?
    barney, shuffle up and deal.


    Report abuse

    Juu wrote on April 20, 2007 01:17 AM: BTW banning poker is ridiculous as poker is a game of skill.