Web Site Analytics
Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
Business


Folks really come here to gamble?

Number of people saying that is primary reason for LV trip is rising

Bet you can't guess what's on the rise in Las Vegas.

It's the number of people who say gambling is the primary reason they visit Southern Nevada.


Most Popular Stories
  • World Series of Poker: 'The Mouth' roars no more
  • Mayor calls Lady Luck casino 'carcass'
  • Small-town flier finds big-time trouble
  • With economy sagging, Las Vegas hotel-casinos offer bargains
  • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE: Vacancies climb as rents fall
  • FOURTH OF JULY TOURISM: Las Vegas is the place for bargain seekers
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Local gaming veteran sees opportunity in small Henderson casino
  • Job hunt is brutal for older workers
  • New Trop owner vows return to glory
  • Gaming index reveals industry still suffering




  • So is the amount of money they budgeted for betting and spent eating and shopping.

    But it's too early to lay odds on whether the wagering uptick is an anomaly or a new trend for a destination that lately has seen more growth in shopping and dining than gambling.

    The tidbit on visitors' gambling habits was just one among hundreds of informative nuggets in the latest edition of the Las Vegas Visitor Profile Study. The survey is the result of 3,600 personal interviews conducted in 2006. The results were compared to surveys from 2003, 2004 and 2005

    The study, released Tuesday, reported that 11 percent of respondents said gambling was their primary reason for visiting Las Vegas, up from 5 percent in 2005.

    The Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority has sponsored the study for 32 years, making it one of the most consistent sources of publicly accessible information about why people visit Las Vegas and what they do during their trips.

    "Certain things change; certain things we don't want to change," said Kevin Bagger, director of Internet marketing and research for the authority.

    The gambling nugget, for example, defies a recent trend in which 5 percent or fewer of the respondents said betting was the main reason they came to Las Vegas.

    "If there is one year that changes, we have to see if it evolves into a trend over time," Bagger said.

    The mean amount of money people budgeted for gambling in 2006 was $652, an increase of slightly more than $25, or about the cost of one hand of blackjack at many tables on the Strip.

    Average spending per trip on food and drink increased more than $12 to nearly $261.

    On a scale of one to five, leisure visitors ranked dining, gambling and gawking at resorts in a statistical dead heat in importance in their decision to visit Las Vegas. Shows, shopping, clubs, spas and golf followed.

    Responses from convention and trade show attendees indicated the mere fact their event was in Las Vegas prompted them to actually attend.

    Among respondents who came for a trade show or convention, 48 percent said that show was in Las Vegas influenced their decision to attend.

    "The brand of Las Vegas is a selling point," Bagger said. "People want to come to the destination, that will support their attendance."

    The number of people from households with six-figure incomes who visit Las Vegas is also on the increase. It was 24 percent in the latest survey and 10 percent in 2003.

    That trend is driving the development of new multibillion-dollar resorts on the Strip, such as the $7.4 billion CityCenter by MGM Mirage and the $4.4 billion Echelon by Boyd Gaming, a company that previously focused on more value-oriented Las Vegas customers.

    "It is our entrance into the luxury tier," said Boyd Gaming spokesman Rob Stillwell. "Until Borgata (Boyd's Atlantic City luxury resort that opened in 2003), that hadn't been part of our customer demographic."

    The amount of money people spent during their Las Vegas trips also increased in 2006, although not by much in some categories.

    The amount spent shopping increased just $4 per person to about $141, much less than the 2004 increase of more than $27 or the 2005 increase of more than $12.

    And when the shopping results are narrowed to include only people who shopped during their trip, the per person spending decreased $14 to $206.

    "I would imagine people have less disposable income to spend in Vegas," said Michael Kammerling, senior vice president of retail at Grubb & Ellis in Las Vegas.

    Kammerling said perhaps rising energy costs and economic uncertainty are making people less willing to open their wallets.

    "I would probably want to wait another year before coming to any conclusions," Kammerling said.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    daniel russell wrote on April 29, 2007 05:01 PM: as much as i like theatre and las vegas shows, i come from new jersey. to go to a show and a good restaurant runs you $350, im not surprised people are gambling that money. 350 lasts alot longer than a show and dinner. if you are a gambler all those thimgs are cheaper because of comps, room etc. im not cheap but it cost me $726 for me and wife from newark. this will kill vegas before anything else


    alan berk wrote on April 26, 2007 01:50 AM: i wonder if the workers for these mega projects are going to be smart enough to live close to where they work or are they going to commute from the northwest or summerlin or Mountains edge!?

    If these workers lived in the neighborhoods east of the strip -las vegas proably wouldn`t need to build any new roads!

    The traffic burden on 1-15 and u.s 95 would be substantially eased!

    Are the people of las vegas smart enough to see that!?

    You could be in your home and relaxing in less then 20 minutes.