Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
Business


AIRPORT CAPACITY REPORT: Study: McCarran must grow fast

LV airport among those pressured by jump in air travel

Las Vegas is among a number of major U.S. cities that must expand existing airports in the next two decades, build new ones or find other solutions to meet an increasing demand for air travel, according to a federal report released Tuesday.

The Federal Aviation Administration released the latest version of its study, titled "Capacity Needs in the National Airspace System." The report examined expected changes to airport capacity through 2025, and said city airports, including those in Atlanta, Las Vegas, Chicago and San Diego, need to expand soon.


Most Popular Stories
  • Buyout to take casino parent private
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • CityCenter licensing gets own hearing
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Chase makes takeover official
  • Vote paves way for LV-style casinos in Ohio
  • Holiday office parties take hit




  • Randall Walker, director of the Clark County Department of Aviation, said McCarran International Airport is adding traffic even faster than FAA projections.

    But he said the report is useful for highlighting on a national level the importance of building capacity in places such as Las Vegas, where McCarran hosted 46.2 million passengers last year.

    "Obviously, if the national airspace system is not functioning, that is going to affect our airport as well," Walker said.

    A third terminal is already in the works for McCarran and it is expected to open in 2011. It will include 14 gates and is estimated to cost $1.8 billion. By 2017, Clark County Aviation officials hope to be operating a new airport near Primm that could support an additional 16 million passengers annually.

    Against the backdrop of the world's busiest airfield, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters on Tuesday praised Atlanta and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport for building another runway and new air traffic control towers. Peters also announced a $1 million grant to study further capacity expansion in Atlanta.

    "By 2025, cities like Atlanta, Las Vegas, Chicago and San Diego are going to risk the lost revenue, lost business and lost appeal that comes with chronic delay," Peters said. "Atlanta's leaders will have to embrace new airports and new ways of thinking."

    Federal Aviation Administration Administrator Marion Blakey said that the current number of air passengers is "sounding a siren that must be responded to" with a regional approach.

    Airports in Boston, Cleveland, Los Angeles, St. Louis and Minneapolis-St. Paul have also recently opened new runways.

    The FAA study began in 2003, reviewing 291 commercial service airports, and whittled that down to the 56 most at risk of overcapacity.

    After the completion of the first version of this study in 2004, it was recommended that Atlanta expand immediately. The city made substantial improvements since, but aviation officials warned it will need to address growing passenger demand before 2025.

    Four airports were identified as needing to expand capacity immediately -- New York's LaGuardia Airport, Newark (N.J.) Liberty International, O'Hare International Airport in Chicago and Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood (Fla.) International.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    CAS127 wrote on May 18, 2007 05:36 AM: Bravo, Mr. Wells - for taking on McCarran fat cats (seen and unseen) who stand to profit from the most expensive (vs. most efficient) solutions to McC's growth.

    Las Vegans, we know this game - to wit, the faux threats to the burn center at UMC...


    Report abuse

    Bill Wells wrote on May 16, 2007 12:18 PM: Mr Spillman,

    There have been several articles about the airport reaching maximum capacity within the next three to four years. Ivanpah is several years away before it will be able to relieve McCarran.

    I am a City Councilman in Mesquite. We are in the process of moving our GA airport from downtown Mesquite to a location 12 miles to the southwest towards Las Vages.

    I have been trying to promote interest in our new airport as an interim solution for McCarran until Ivanpah is built. There is interest in several camps, but for some reason Randy Walker is against us.

    We could have a commercial runway built in four years if we could get the support to get it done.

    I would be more than happy to talk to you about our airport.

    You have my email address. My cell phone is 702-287-1213.

    Thank you,

    Bill Wells