Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Business

Saturday
Jul 31, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 101° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


DEVELOPMENT: Panel upholds plan for downtown arena

Special committee decides gambling may be part of proposed project

Backers of a proposed sports arena in downtown Las Vegas overcame a potential deal-killer Wednesday when a little-known state review panel upheld a plan to allow casinos as part of the project.

The unanimous decision by an appointed panel that convened for just its third time in 10 years endorsed a recent decision by the Las Vegas City Council to allow gaming near the proposed arena site south of Charleston Boulevard and east of Interstate 15.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Boyd won't bid on Station Casinos' properties
  2. Silverton to restore part of employees' slashed pay
  3. Bank of NLV ordered to increase its capital
  4. Shares of gaming companies wilt in July
  5. IN BRIEF
  6. FTC: No more upfront fees for companies to help consumers



Without the authority to include casinos, the proposed $9.5 billion, 85-acre project would have been in jeopardy, said an attorney arguing on behalf of REI Neon, the Michigan-based group trying to develop the now blighted site.

Opponents of the decision to authorize gambling as part of the arena development turned to the state panel, called the Review Panel of the Gaming Policy Committee, to overrule the City Council.

"This is very unusual for a body of appointed people to look over the shoulders of elected officials," said Peter Bernhard, one of four members on the state panel. "This is a position of considerable power, but it is also a position of considerable responsibility."

But in the case of the proposed arena plan opponents argued an intervention was justified because the City Council authorized the creation of a Gaming Enterprise District without any evidence that casino builders would make necessary road and infrastructure improvements to prevent already crowded streets like Charleston Boulevard from devolving into gridlock.

Attorney Charles Gardner called the proposed location, "the absolute worst place to put a casino ... in this valley.

"Charleston Boulevard is a traffic nightmare," he said.

Las Vegas resident Charles Weiner hired Gardner to make a case to the panel that the city should have waited until a builder or operator agreed to take responsibility for offsetting the community impact of casinos on the site before approving it as a suitable location for gambling.

The proposal calls for an arena, 1,500 residential units, 1.2 million square feet of commercial space, 6,000 hotel rooms and up to 300,000 square feet of gambling space.

The project site also overlaps an existing downtown arts district, which has prompted criticism from the art community. Weiner, described by Gardner as a camera-shy patron of the arts, didn't speak during the hearing and only briefly before.

"The project is the wrong project at the wrong location at the wrong time," Weiner said.

Arena backers appeared at the hearing with several lawyers on their side, including Las Vegas City Attorney Brad Jerbic and former U.S. Sen. Richard Bryan, now with the law firm Lionel Sawyer & Collins.

Near the beginning of the hearing Bryan argued that upholding the will of the City Council would help reverse decades of urban decay in Las Vegas, a phenomenon that has plagued cities across America since postwar families began fleeing central cities for outlying areas.

"The economic centrifugal forces that have driven millions of people to the suburbs ... is an effect we have witnessed in Las Vegas as well," Bryan told the panel, recalling childhood visits with his family to Mason Furniture. "The intervening six decades have not been kind to that area."

Bryan and other REI supporters said the 1997 law that created the review panel and process for challenging gambling districts was meant to protect established suburban areas from encroaching neighborhood casinos, not put the brakes on redevelopment projects in blighted urban areas.

They pointed to comments of support from residents in neighborhoods closest to the proposed arena development and suggested opposition was led by people who lived further away, implying the opponents had less at stake in the dispute.

"(Weiner) lives in an enclosed community," said Bryan, displaying a map that showed Weiner's home near Rancho Drive and Oakey Bouelvard on the other side of Interstate 15 from the site. "It would be impossible for him to see at that elevation any aspect of this project, I'm sure."

Opponents, however, said there is no guarantee the decision to allow casinos on the site would help reverse the blight in an area that has few houses, poor traffic flow and is plagued by social problems like homelessness and illegal drug use.

Gardner said the authorization could hinder efforts to revive the neighborhood if the arena developers don't complete the project. That's because the gambling designation would raise property values and make it more expensive for the city to undertake infrastructure improvements and eminent domain proceedings to upgrade the area as an alternative to the arena plan.

Once the gambling district is in place REI would have economic incentive to sell the newly rezoned land without doing the project, Gardner said.

"All they want to do is increase the property values then flip and that is an insult to this panel," he said.

Gardner also criticized the City Council for accepting a traffic study that said traffic engineers were "cautiously optimistic" that future street upgrades could accommodate new traffic from the arena, casinos and other projects proposed in the plan.

"You put your life savings on black 20 and you can be as optimistic as you want to be and it is not going to help," Gardner said. "It is just a gamble."

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (6)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

Donald Hickey wrote on July 30, 2007 09:22 PM: I think that this project will encounter yet another political hurdle. As more of the public who live in the surrounding, affluent neighborhoods, along Oakey Blvd. realize the mammoth size of this structure, it will become quite unpopular. The 6000 room hotel with casino would alone be bigger than the MGM Grand. Add stadium and other facilities and You have something on the scale of City Center. This project will be a massive eyesore and traffic jammer for residents of both East and West Oakey.

This isn't as simple as sports vs the arts as the media has made it out to be. The behemoth project just isn't in line with it's neighbors. And could go beyond inuring the arts district. It could seriously hurt the GOOD neighborhoods which hold the only stalwart residents of the downtown area.

Ironically if The City would call for something which is a bit more demure and eye appealing (possibly including a stadium) which would integrate with the arts district and downtown in general, this would not even be an issue.


Report abuse

hdstmf wrote on July 26, 2007 12:37 PM: The fix is still in. It will put another nail in the coffin of downtown casinos if it materializes. I predict the whole project will fade away.

Attention FBI! Here is another target-rich environment for you. Dust off your wiretap equipment and go for your career-advancement opportunities.


Report abuse

JOEL wrote on July 26, 2007 11:09 AM: I am so glad someone has the guts to stand up to developers. This will hurt the arts, and the surrounding neighborhoods.


Report abuse

Slipperton Fangbutton wrote on July 26, 2007 11:05 AM: If you want a great example of how gaming has helped combat surrounding urban blight, just look at the neighborhood around Boulder Station -- it's been transformed into paradise! And the neighborhood around Arizona Charlie's ... and the neighborhood around Palace Station ...positively magical, I tell you!


Report abuse

J wrote on July 26, 2007 09:16 AM: I HOPE REI flips the land to a local resort developer with more experience and concern for the area.


Report abuse

Aaron wrote on July 26, 2007 06:04 AM: Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks there's a chance that REI, once they get the written approval for gambling on the site of their proposed arena, would just blow the project off and flip the land to make a profit because of the new gambling designation for the area. If they DID do that, there isn't one frickin' thing the city could do about it, except possibly remove the gambling designation, if that's allowed per the 1997 law noted in the article.