Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Business


Big prices for rights to tap heat

Auction of geothermal leases in Nevada and California raises $20 million

The federal government sold geothermal leases on public land in Nevada and California on Tuesday for $20 million including the highest per-acre bid in history.

At an auction in Reno, the Bureau of Land Management took bids on 49 parcels of land, including 43 in Nevada.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • Residence in Summerlin sold for $11.5 million
  • Blocked club door sparks lawsuit, accusations of racism
  • MORTGAGE PAYMENTS SLASHED: BofA deal will help Nevadans
  • HOUSING: FORECLOSURE WOES RISE
  • INSIDE GAMING: That thud? It's casino stocks crashing
  • HOUSING SECTOR: Economic woes hit home
  • NEVADA ECONOMY: STILL ON A LOSING ROLL
  • Gaming board confident Aliante can survive times
  • Hurricane fallout brings end to bid for Golden Nuggets
  • CRUNCH GOES COMMERCIAL



  • Bidders were seeking the right to tap into hot underground water and steam pockets that can be used to generate electricity. Geothermal power is considered a renewable energy that produces little pollution.

    Nevada has vast resources of geothermal power, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has argued that geothermal energy should be used for power generation instead of coal.

    The leases in Nevada total 123,000 acres in Churchill, Pershing, Mineral, Nye and Lander counties and sold for $11.7 million. Ormat Nevada of Reno submitted the highest bid for lands in Nevada, $510 per acre on 5,120 acres for a total of $2.6 million.

    Other bidders paid $300 or more per acre for Nevada leases.

    Binkley Geo Resources of Santa Monica, Calif., submitted the highest bid in history for a BLM geothermal lease for 2,700 acres in the Geysers geothermal field of California. The company will pay $14,000 per acre for 470 acres or $8 million.

    BLM Deputy Director Henri Bisson in a statement said the agency was "pleased with the unexpectedly high interest" in the geothermal leases.

    "The success of today's sale is a harbinger of continued rising interest in developing the nation's considerable geothermal energy resources, most of which are found on public lands," Bisson said.

    Half of the money from the leases will go to Nevada. The county in which the lease is located will get one-quarter of the money; the rest will go to the BLM.

    The BLM administers 29 geothermal power plants on federal land in Nevada, California and Utah. The power plants can generate 1,250 megawatts of power, enough to supply the needs of 1.2 million homes.

    Nevada has geothermal plants with a total power generation capacity of 270 megawatts, enough for 270,000 households. There are more BLM geothermal leases in Nevada than in all other states combined, the BLM said. Most geothermal plants are in Northern Nevada.



    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Stan wrote on August 15, 2007 08:21 PM: Something wrong with the arithmetic. For example, 470 acres at $14,000/acre is $658,000, not $8,000,000. Perhaps the lease is for$14,000 per acre per year and the lease is for 12 years?

    Does anyone know if those leases that seem to go for $300/acre to $14,000/acre($500/acre) are yearly rents? If that's a 1 time fee and the use is forever, the citizens are again getting screwed.
    If the use is for geothermal energy, wouldn't it be logical to have a 2 tiered lease? The first would be a yearly rental based on acreage, and the second would be based on the amount of heat energy removed.


    Travis wrote on August 15, 2007 11:19 AM: It's about time this state started making better uses of the natural resources.